Who would likely agree that amateurs, although not formally taught, can significantly impact a field of study?
Understand the Problem
The question asks to compare the details mentioned in two texts about Anning, highlighting what both texts include. It also inquires who would likely agree that amateurs can significantly impact a field of study, pointing towards an evaluative judgment that relates to the authors' perspectives.
Answer
Both authors
The final answer is both authors.
Answer for screen readers
The final answer is both authors.
More Information
Both texts recognize that amateurs, like Mary Anning, can significantly contribute to scientific fields despite not having formal education.
Tips
Ensure all the listed details match in both texts to confirm a shared viewpoint.
Sources
AI-generated content may contain errors. Please verify critical information
Thank you for voting!
