What was the ruling and significance of Marbury v. Madison and McCulloch v. Maryland?
Understand the Problem
The question is asking about the rulings and significance of two important Supreme Court cases in U.S. history: Marbury v. Madison and McCulloch v. Maryland. It requires an explanation of the legal principles established by these cases and their impact on the federal government and its relationship with state governments.
Answer
Marbury v. Madison established judicial review; McCulloch v. Maryland expanded federal power.
Marbury v. Madison established judicial review, allowing courts to declare laws unconstitutional, solidifying the Supreme Court's role as a co-equal branch. McCulloch v. Maryland affirmed federal authority to create a national bank and prohibited states from taxing it, thus expanding federal government power over states.
Answer for screen readers
Marbury v. Madison established judicial review, allowing courts to declare laws unconstitutional, solidifying the Supreme Court's role as a co-equal branch. McCulloch v. Maryland affirmed federal authority to create a national bank and prohibited states from taxing it, thus expanding federal government power over states.
More Information
Marbury v. Madison (1803) was pivotal in assigning the judiciary the power to strike down unconstitutional acts, ensuring a balance among governmental branches. McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) reinforced federal supremacy and interpreted the 'Necessary and Proper' Clause to give Congress implied powers.
Tips
A common mistake is confusing the cases' outcomes: Marbury is about judicial review, while McCulloch addresses federalism.
Sources
- Marbury v. Madison | Background, Summary, & Significance - britannica.com
- McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) - National Archives - archives.gov
- The Supreme Court . The First Hundred Years . Landmark Cases - thirteen.org
AI-generated content may contain errors. Please verify critical information
