What are the critiques of the conventional model of development and the different views on sustainable development as outlined in the Brundtland report?

Understand the Problem

The question is asking for an analysis of critiques on the conventional model of development as well as different views on sustainable development, including the Brundtland report and its definitions. It covers the impacts of economic growth, social inequality, and environmental considerations in development.

Answer

Critiques focus on economic growth and resource depletion. The Brundtland Report advocates for development that meets present needs sustainably, with varying interpretations.

The critique of the conventional model highlights its focus on economic growth, resource depletion, and inequality. The Brundtland Report emphasizes sustainable development as meeting current needs without harming future generations. Views on sustainability vary from a weaker approach allowing for substitution of capital to stronger and ideal approaches emphasizing ecological limits and intrinsic value.

More Information

The Brundtland Report helped popularize the concept of sustainable development. It balances economic, social, and environmental considerations, and critiques often center around its broad and sometimes vague definitions allowing multiple interpretations.

Tips

Avoid assuming that economic and human-made capital can fully substitute natural capital without ecological consequences.

Sources

A critique of the Brundtland Report: A sustainable development perspective - buzzonearth.com
Brundtland Report - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics - sciencedirect.com
The comparison of the conventional development and sustainable development model - researchgate.net

AI-generated content may contain errors. Please verify critical information

Thank you for voting!