war is not hell but a social practice subject to moral evaluation. Even extraterritorial jurisdiction to protect aliens appealed to the morally attractive notion of international s... war is not hell but a social practice subject to moral evaluation. Even extraterritorial jurisdiction to protect aliens appealed to the morally attractive notion of international safeguards of basic rights. These potentially progressive elements of the classic standard of civilization came into play primarily in the twentieth century. But even in the late nineteenth century they could have surprising results. The end of extraterritoriality in Japan. Although largely imposed by force, extraterritoriality was not seen by Europeans as inconsistent with the legal equality of states. The treaty rights of Westerners in China and Japan allegedly rested on the obligation of every member of international society to abide by minimum rules of civilized behavior as a condition of membership. For example, Article 1 of the Treaty of Nanking (1842), the cornerstone of the system of unequal treaties, guaranteed Chinese and British subjects 'full security and protection for their persons and property within the dominions of the other' state...
Understand the Problem
The text discusses the evolution of international norms and standards of civilization, emphasizing the transition from extraterritoriality and colonialism to the recognition of human rights as a new standard. It explores how different nations, especially Japan and China, navigated their interactions with Western powers while maintaining sovereignty and making judicial reforms. The text also outlines the changing attitudes towards human rights and self-determination in the context of global politics, particularly after significant historical events like the Second World War and the Cold War, culminating in an emphasis on universal human rights norms.
Answer
War is a social practice that can be morally evaluated.
The quote "war is not hell but a social practice subject to moral evaluation" suggests that war, unlike hell, is not outside the realm of human judgment and ethical assessment. Rather, it can be evaluated morally and ethically in terms of conduct and consequences.
Answer for screen readers
The quote "war is not hell but a social practice subject to moral evaluation" suggests that war, unlike hell, is not outside the realm of human judgment and ethical assessment. Rather, it can be evaluated morally and ethically in terms of conduct and consequences.
More Information
The discussion around war as a social practice reflects a modern perspective where actions in war are subjected to international norms and human rights evaluations. This contrasts with historical views that considered war as an unavoidable and amoral aspect of human interaction.
Tips
Do not confuse the MAS*H quote "war is war, and hell is hell" which emphasizes the severity of war without the aspect of moral evaluation, whereas the discussed quote contextualizes war within a moral framework.
Sources
- Human Rights: A New Standard of Civilization? - jstor - jstor.org
- Human rights: a new standard of civilization? - library.fes.de
- Human Rights: A New Standard of Civilization | Jack Donnelly - academia.edu
