The separation of powers among the three branches of government was designed to eliminate the possibility of one branch dominating the others. True or false?
Understand the Problem
The question is asking whether the separation of powers among the three branches of government was intended to prevent one branch from becoming more powerful than the others, and whether this statement is true or false.
Answer
True.
The final answer is True.
Answer for screen readers
The final answer is True.
More Information
The separation of powers among the three branches of government—legislative, executive, and judicial—was designed with the intention of preventing any single branch from gaining dominance over the others. This system is also known as 'checks and balances,' where each branch has distinct powers and responsibilities, ensuring a balance of power.
Tips
A common mistake is to think that separation of powers eliminates all conflict between branches. In truth, it creates a structured competition to ensure no single branch overreaches its authority.
Sources
- Separation of Powers: An Overview - CRS Reports - Congress.gov - crsreports.congress.gov
- Separation of Powers | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute - law.cornell.edu
- Federalist 51 (1788) - The National Constitution Center - constitutioncenter.org
AI-generated content may contain errors. Please verify critical information
