In the Nichols v. Universal case, what aspect of the stories was identified as common between the two works?
Understand the Problem
The question asks us to identify a common aspect between two works in the Nichols v. Universal case, focusing on themes, characters, settings, or conflicts.
Answer
Both stories feature a Jewish family and an Irish Catholic family with fathers trying to prevent their children's marriage.
The common aspects between the two works were the depiction of a Jewish family and an Irish Catholic family, where the fathers try to prevent their children's marriage to each other. The stories end in reconciliation, but there was no literal copying of specific elements such as names, dialogues, or scenes.
Answer for screen readers
The common aspects between the two works were the depiction of a Jewish family and an Irish Catholic family, where the fathers try to prevent their children's marriage to each other. The stories end in reconciliation, but there was no literal copying of specific elements such as names, dialogues, or scenes.
More Information
The case highlights the idea that copyright law protects against copying specific expressions, but not against the use of similar themes or ideas.
Tips
A common mistake is confusing similar themes with copyright infringement; the law protects expressions of ideas, not the ideas themselves.
Sources
- Nichols v. Universal Pictures Corp., 45 F.2d 119 (2d Cir. 1930) - law.justia.com
AI-generated content may contain errors. Please verify critical information
