In the case of Eastwood v Kenyon (18040) 11 Ad & el 438, Eastwood did not provide consideration for Kenyon's promises to reimburse him. Is this true or false?
Understand the Problem
The question is asking whether the statement regarding the court's decision in the case of Eastwood v Kenyon is true or false, specifically relating to the issue of consideration for the promises made.
Answer
True, Eastwood did not provide consideration.
True, Eastwood did not provide consideration for Kenyon's promises to reimburse him.
Answer for screen readers
True, Eastwood did not provide consideration for Kenyon's promises to reimburse him.
More Information
The case established that past consideration is not sufficient for a promise to be enforceable in contract law.
Tips
A common mistake is misunderstanding the concept of consideration in contract law. Ensure that you understand that consideration must be a present or future exchange of value, not something done in the past.
Sources
AI-generated content may contain errors. Please verify critical information
