Explain any two amongst the three logical fallacies given below. Provide an example for each to illustrate your explanation further. a) Post Hoc Fallacy b) Ad Populum Fallacy c) St... Explain any two amongst the three logical fallacies given below. Provide an example for each to illustrate your explanation further. a) Post Hoc Fallacy b) Ad Populum Fallacy c) Strawman Fallacy
Understand the Problem
The question is asking for explanations of two logical fallacies from the provided list (Post Hoc Fallacy, Ad Populum Fallacy, and Strawman Fallacy), along with examples for each of those fallacies to illustrate the explanations.
Answer
Post Hoc Fallacy: Assuming sequence implies causation (e.g., lucky shoes caused a win). Strawman Fallacy: Misrepresenting an argument to refute it (e.g., "Eat healthier" becomes "Eat leaves like rabbits").
The Post Hoc Fallacy refers to the mistaken belief that if one event follows another, the first event must have caused the second. Example: "I wore my lucky shoes and won the game, so the shoes made me win." The Strawman Fallacy involves misrepresenting someone's argument to make it easier to attack. Example: "Person A: We should eat healthier. Person B: So you want us to only eat leaves like rabbits?"
Answer for screen readers
The Post Hoc Fallacy refers to the mistaken belief that if one event follows another, the first event must have caused the second. Example: "I wore my lucky shoes and won the game, so the shoes made me win." The Strawman Fallacy involves misrepresenting someone's argument to make it easier to attack. Example: "Person A: We should eat healthier. Person B: So you want us to only eat leaves like rabbits?"
More Information
The Post Hoc fallacy often arises due to confusion between correlation and causation. The Strawman fallacy is a common tactic in debates, allowing one to sidestep addressing the actual argument.
Tips
A common mistake with the Post Hoc Fallacy is assuming that because events are sequential, there must be a causal relationship. For the Strawman Fallacy, misunderstanding the original argument can lead to faulty refutations.
Sources
AI-generated content may contain errors. Please verify critical information
