Consider the training dataset shown in Table 2. Apply Naïve Bayes classifier to predict whether the student gets job offer or not in his final year of the course when the test data... Consider the training dataset shown in Table 2. Apply Naïve Bayes classifier to predict whether the student gets job offer or not in his final year of the course when the test data is (CGPA = 8.5, Interactiveness = Yes).
Understand the Problem
The question involves applying a Naïve Bayes classifier to a dataset in order to predict whether a student will receive a job offer based on CGPA and interactiveness. Specifically, it asks for a prediction related to a CGPA of 8.5 and an interactiveness of 'Yes.'
Answer
The prediction for the test data (CGPA = 8.5, Interactiveness = Yes) is **Yes**.
Answer for screen readers
The prediction for the student with CGPA = 8.5 and Interactiveness = 'Yes' is Yes.
Steps to Solve
- Calculating Prior Probabilities
First, we need to calculate the prior probabilities for the classes (Job Offer: Yes or No):
- Number of instances with Job Offer = Yes: 5
- Number of instances with Job Offer = No: 5
The total number of instances is 10.
Thus, the prior probabilities are:
$$ P(\text{Yes}) = \frac{5}{10} = 0.5 $$
$$ P(\text{No}) = \frac{5}{10} = 0.5 $$
- Calculating Conditional Probabilities
Next, calculate the conditional probabilities for CGPA and Interactiveness:
For CGPA:
- We assume a Gaussian distribution for CGPA. Calculate the mean and standard deviation of CGPA for both classes.
For Class "Yes":
- CGPAs: 9.5, 8.4, 9.1, 9.6, 8.6
Mean:
$$ \mu_{\text{Yes}} = \frac{9.5 + 8.4 + 9.1 + 9.6 + 8.6}{5} = \frac{45.2}{5} = 9.04 $$
Standard Deviation:
$$ \sigma_{\text{Yes}} = \sqrt{\frac{(9.5 - 9.04)^2 + (8.4 - 9.04)^2 + (9.1 - 9.04)^2 + (9.6 - 9.04)^2 + (8.6 - 9.04)^2}{5}} $$
Calculating this will yield approximately:
$$ \sigma_{\text{Yes}} \approx 0.435 $$
For Class "No":
- CGPAs: 8.2, 9.3, 7.6, 7.5, 8.3
Mean:
$$ \mu_{\text{No}} = \frac{8.2 + 9.3 + 7.6 + 7.5 + 8.3}{5} = \frac{40.9}{5} = 8.18 $$
Standard Deviation:
$$ \sigma_{\text{No}} = \sqrt{\frac{(8.2 - 8.18)^2 + (9.3 - 8.18)^2 + (7.6 - 8.18)^2 + (7.5 - 8.18)^2 + (8.3 - 8.18)^2}{5}} $$
Calculating this will yield approximately:
$$ \sigma_{\text{No}} \approx 0.456 $$
For Interactiveness:
- Yes (Job Offer = Yes): Count = 5
- No (Job Offer = Yes): Count = 0
Thus:
$$ P(\text{Yes | Interactiveness=Yes}) = \frac{5}{5} = 1 $$
$$ P(\text{No | Interactiveness=Yes}) = \frac{0}{5} = 0 $$
- Applying Gaussian Probability Density Function (PDF)
Calculate the Gaussian PDF for CGPA = 8.5 under each class:
For Yes:
$$ P(\text{CGPA=8.5 | Yes}) = \frac{1}{\sigma_{\text{Yes}} \sqrt{2\pi}} e^{-\frac{(8.5 - \mu_{\text{Yes}})^2}{2\sigma_{\text{Yes}}^2}} $$
Substituting our values:
$$ P(\text{CGPA=8.5 | Yes}) \approx \frac{1}{0.435 \sqrt{2\pi}} e^{-\frac{(8.5 - 9.04)^2}{2 \cdot (0.435)^2}} $$
For No:
$$ P(\text{CGPA=8.5 | No}) = \frac{1}{\sigma_{\text{No}} \sqrt{2\pi}} e^{-\frac{(8.5 - \mu_{\text{No}})^2}{2\sigma_{\text{No}}^2}} $$
Substituting our values:
$$ P(\text{CGPA=8.5 | No}) \approx \frac{1}{0.456 \sqrt{2\pi}} e^{-\frac{(8.5 - 8.18)^2}{2 \cdot (0.456)^2}} $$
- Calculation of Posterior Probabilities
Now, calculate:
$$ P(\text{Yes | Data}) = P(\text{CGPA=8.5 | Yes}) \cdot P(\text{Yes | Interactiveness=Yes}) $$
$$ P(\text{No | Data}) = P(\text{CGPA=8.5 | No}) \cdot P(\text{No | Interactiveness=Yes}) $$
Since ( P(\text{No | Interactiveness=Yes}) = 0 ), we only need ( P(\text{Yes | Data}) ).
- Final Prediction
Determine which posterior probability is higher:
If ( P(\text{Yes | Data}) > P(\text{No | Data}) ): Predict "Yes" Else: Predict "No"
The prediction for the student with CGPA = 8.5 and Interactiveness = 'Yes' is Yes.
More Information
This prediction is made using the Naïve Bayes classifier, which provides a probabilistic approach for classification. In this case, the high probability associated with being interactive plays a significant role in the student's positive prediction for a job offer.
Tips
- Ignoring Continuous Variables: Sometimes, users may forget the Gaussian assumption for continuous variables. Remember to apply the Gaussian PDF for such cases.
- Calculation Errors: Net calculation errors can lead to incorrect predictions. Careful arithmetic is crucial.
- Assuming Equal Prior: Current dataset led to equal priors, but this may not be the case in different datasets. Always verify.
AI-generated content may contain errors. Please verify critical information