Compare the details that were included in both texts. Which statement would the author of Text 1 likely agree with?
Understand the Problem
The question is asking to compare specific details included in two texts regarding Lacks's cells and to determine which statement the author of Text 1 would likely agree with. This involves analyzing the provided information about the texts.
Answer
The medical breakthroughs made with HeLa cells do not excuse researchers’ failure to inform Lacks’s family about them.
The author of Text 1 would likely agree with the statement: 'The medical breakthroughs made with HeLa cells do not excuse researchers’ failure to inform Lacks’s family about them.'
Answer for screen readers
The author of Text 1 would likely agree with the statement: 'The medical breakthroughs made with HeLa cells do not excuse researchers’ failure to inform Lacks’s family about them.'
More Information
Text 1 likely highlights ethical concerns regarding the use of Lacks's cells without her family's knowledge, reflecting an emphasis on informed consent.
Tips
A common mistake is assuming the perspectives are entirely about the scientific advances without considering ethical implications.
AI-generated content may contain errors. Please verify critical information
