Charge capture relates to charges for missed appointments. True or False? How would you properly index the name 'Jill Freeman, M.D.' for filing if you had another patient with the... Charge capture relates to charges for missed appointments. True or False? How would you properly index the name 'Jill Freeman, M.D.' for filing if you had another patient with the same name but without the title? For a record to be admissible as evidence in court, the person dictating or writing the entries must be able to attest that they were true and correct at the time they were written. True or False?
Understand the Problem
The questions are related to medical record keeping and indexing, focusing on charge capture, proper indexing of names including titles, and the admissibility of records as evidence. They ask for specific responses to statements about these topics.
Answer
35: False, 36: C. Freeman, Jill, 37: C. True; False.
The final answer to question 35 is False, question 36 is C. Freeman, Jill, and question 37 is C. The first statement is true; the second is false.
Answer for screen readers
The final answer to question 35 is False, question 36 is C. Freeman, Jill, and question 37 is C. The first statement is true; the second is false.
More Information
Charge capture typically relates to capturing revenue for services provided, not for missed appointments. Proper indexing of names involves listing the last name first, followed by the first name and middle initial or title. For a record to be admissible, accuracy at the time it was written is crucial, but attestations of truth and correctness aren't always required.
Tips
A common mistake is assuming charge capture includes all charges, even non-service-related like missed appointments.
AI-generated content may contain errors. Please verify critical information
