A hospital is considering replacing its regular doorknobs with copper-coated ones to reduce hospital-acquired infections. Using a suitable technique, determine the effectiveness of... A hospital is considering replacing its regular doorknobs with copper-coated ones to reduce hospital-acquired infections. Using a suitable technique, determine the effectiveness of copper and stainless steel against Klebsiella pneumoniae.
Understand the Problem
The question is asking for a determination of the effectiveness of copper and stainless steel materials against the bacterium Klebsiella pneumoniae, particularly in the context of reducing hospital-acquired infections. It suggests the need for a suitable technique to assess this effectiveness.
Answer
Copper is more effective than stainless steel against Klebsiella pneumoniae.
Copper surfaces have demonstrated a marked reduction in Klebsiella pneumoniae compared to stainless steel, effectively reducing bacterial viability within 30 minutes of exposure.
Answer for screen readers
Copper surfaces have demonstrated a marked reduction in Klebsiella pneumoniae compared to stainless steel, effectively reducing bacterial viability within 30 minutes of exposure.
More Information
Copper's antimicrobial properties rapidly reduce bacterial load, while stainless steel lacks similar effectiveness. This can significantly decrease the spread of hospital-acquired infections.
Tips
Ensure proper coating and surface area coverage when applying copper for maximum antimicrobial effect.
Sources
- Antimicrobial efficacy of copper touch surfaces - researchgate.net
- Antimicrobial Properties of Selected Copper Alloys - mdpi.com
AI-generated content may contain errors. Please verify critical information
