Podcast
Questions and Answers
Is a dyad defined as the individualized relationship between a leader and each follower in a work unit?
Is a dyad defined as the individualized relationship between a leader and each follower in a work unit?
True (A)
Does dyadic theory approach leadership as an exchange relationship that develops over time during role-making activities?
Does dyadic theory approach leadership as an exchange relationship that develops over time during role-making activities?
True (A)
Are in-group followers characterized by high mutual trust, respect, loyalty, and influence in their relationship with the leader?
Are in-group followers characterized by high mutual trust, respect, loyalty, and influence in their relationship with the leader?
True (A)
Are out-group followers characterized by few or no social ties to their leader and a strictly task-centered relationship?
Are out-group followers characterized by few or no social ties to their leader and a strictly task-centered relationship?
Effective followers combine two roles: to execute decisions made by a leader, or to raise issues about those decisions when they are deemed misguided or unethical.
Effective followers combine two roles: to execute decisions made by a leader, or to raise issues about those decisions when they are deemed misguided or unethical.
Alienated followers feel cheated for exemplary work.
Alienated followers feel cheated for exemplary work.
Delegation should only occur when time is short for priority tasks.
Delegation should only occur when time is short for priority tasks.
Passive followers are always actively engaged in decision-making.
Passive followers are always actively engaged in decision-making.
The (in-group) includes followers with strong social ties to their leader in a supportive relationship characterized by high mutual trust, respect, lovalty, and influence
The (in-group) includes followers with strong social ties to their leader in a supportive relationship characterized by high mutual trust, respect, lovalty, and influence
Ingratiation is the effort to appear supportive, appreciative, and respectful.
Ingratiation is the effort to appear supportive, appreciative, and respectful.
Followership behavior results from the leader-follower mutual influencing relationship.
Followership behavior results from the leader-follower mutual influencing relationship.
There are different follower types, including alienated, conformist, passive, effective, and pragmatic followers.
There are different follower types, including alienated, conformist, passive, effective, and pragmatic followers.
The (out-group) includes followers with few or no social ties to their leader, in a strictly task centered relationship characterized by low exchange and top-down influence.
The (out-group) includes followers with few or no social ties to their leader, in a strictly task centered relationship characterized by low exchange and top-down influence.
Locus of control is a belief over who has control of a person’s destiny.
Locus of control is a belief over who has control of a person’s destiny.
Several power types, education, and experience can boost upward influence and help in delegation.
Several power types, education, and experience can boost upward influence and help in delegation.
In-groups and out-groups: in-group leaders use expert, referent, and reward power, while out-group leaders use position power.
In-groups and out-groups: in-group leaders use expert, referent, and reward power, while out-group leaders use position power.
The (out-group )includes followers with few or no social ties to their leader, in a strictly task centered relationship characterized by low exchange and top-down influence.
The (out-group )includes followers with few or no social ties to their leader, in a strictly task centered relationship characterized by low exchange and top-down influence.
Proactive followers seek feedback, show initiative, possess commitment, responsibility, and the right attitude.
Proactive followers seek feedback, show initiative, possess commitment, responsibility, and the right attitude.
Impressions-driven and performance-driven motives influence follower behavior in LMX relationships.
Impressions-driven and performance-driven motives influence follower behavior in LMX relationships.
LMX relationships involve reciprocal exchanges, and leaders can support follower careers.
LMX relationships involve reciprocal exchanges, and leaders can support follower careers.
Study Notes
Vertical Dyadic Linkage (VDL) and Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Theory
- VDL theory was renamed the leader-member exchange theory (LMX) in the 1980s.
- In-groups and out-groups: in-group leaders use expert, referent, and reward power, while out-group leaders use position power.
- LMX relationships are based on social exchanges, emphasizing reciprocity.
- According to LMX theory, a leader's behavior varies based on the quality of the interpersonal relationship with each individual.
- Both the leader and the follower influence the exchange relationship in LMX theory.
- LMX relationships develop when leaders transition from economic-based exchange to socially based exchange.
- A positive work climate fosters positive LMX relationships between leaders and followers and among followers.
- Proactive followers seek feedback, show initiative, possess commitment, responsibility, and the right attitude.
- Impressions-driven and performance-driven motives influence follower behavior in LMX relationships.
- High-quality LMX relationships result in more organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) and higher performance ratings for employees.
- LMX relationships involve reciprocal exchanges, and leaders can support follower careers.
- Criticisms of LMX theory include the LMX-7 questionnaire's single perspective, attribution bias, and questions about its predictive power.
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.
Related Documents
Description
Test your knowledge about the Vertical Dyadic Linkage (VDL) theory, which focuses on how the relationship between a leader and follower can affect leadership. Learn about the evolution of VDL into the leader-member exchange theory (LMX) in the 1980s.