Podcast
Questions and Answers
According to realism, how does it view the role of international law?
According to realism, how does it view the role of international law?
- Realism focuses on how international law can promote cooperation among states.
- International law is a powerful tool for regulating states' behavior.
- States have little regard for international law as it is weak. (correct)
- Realism believes that international law should be enforced by non-governmental organizations (NGOs).
How does constructivism differ from realism regarding the role of international law?
How does constructivism differ from realism regarding the role of international law?
- Constructivism advocates for international law enforcement by military alliances.
- Constructivism sees international law as a social construct that can be altered by actors. (correct)
- Constructivism emphasizes strict adherence to traditional international law principles.
- Constructivism believes that international law is unchangeable due to state sovereignty.
In liberalism, how is the concept of sovereignty viewed in relation to international law?
In liberalism, how is the concept of sovereignty viewed in relation to international law?
- Liberalism sees international law as a constraint on state actions.
- Liberalism views international law as a tool to define roles for different actors while promoting cooperation. (correct)
- Liberalism believes in complete sovereignty with no regard for international law.
- Liberalism advocates for the abolition of sovereign states in favor of global governance.
How does Marxism differ from liberalism in its approach to international law?
How does Marxism differ from liberalism in its approach to international law?
Which perspective emphasizes the role of economy and exploitation in international law?
Which perspective emphasizes the role of economy and exploitation in international law?
What distinguishes constructivism from realism and liberalism in terms of the perception of international law?
What distinguishes constructivism from realism and liberalism in terms of the perception of international law?