Rawls's Hypothetical Contract Argument
16 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What is one of the main weaknesses in Rawls's hypothetical contract argument?

  • It assumes all contracts lead to just outcomes. (correct)
  • It disregards moral beliefs shared among people.
  • It is based on real contracts rather than hypothetical ones.
  • It incorporates elements that are too fair to be realistic.
  • What does Rawls mean by 'the original position'?

  • A hypothetical scenario where parties agree on justice. (correct)
  • A contractual agreement established by social norms.
  • A historical context of property distribution.
  • A philosophical debate on moral beliefs.
  • Which element in the original position reflects Rawls's view on sexual discrimination?

  • Awareness of societal biases.
  • Ignorance of one's sex. (correct)
  • Understanding of economic status.
  • Knowledge of personal wealth.
  • What is necessary for the agreement from the original position to be deemed valid?

    <p>All parties must have equal knowledge and opportunity.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Why does Rawls impose ignorance in the original position?

    <p>To ensure impartiality and fairness among parties.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What could be argued against Rawls's method if unfair elements are shown in the original position?

    <p>The fairness of the contract would be undermined.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which hypothetical contract is used to illustrate a poor justification of Rawls's argument?

    <p>A contract where possessions are exchanged for a book.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does Rawls suggest is necessary for the elements of the original position?

    <p>They must be universally accepted as fair.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What are primary goods according to Rawls?

    <p>Liberties, opportunities, and social bases of self-respect</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Why did Rawls introduce the concept of primary goods?

    <p>To enable choices without knowledge of personal desires</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What criticism is directed at the neutrality of primary goods?

    <p>They promote individualistic society structures</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What moral belief does Rawls attempt to reflect through ignorance of members' assets?

    <p>No one deserves the benefits of natural and social advantages</p> Signup and view all the answers

    How does Rawls regard natural talents in the context of moral fairness?

    <p>They are irrelevant to a fair judgment of individuals</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is a potential flaw identified regarding Rawls's idea of communal goods?

    <p>They are often overlooked in individualist societies</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Why might some resist the claim that talents should not determine societal benefits?

    <p>They believe hard work should not go unrewarded</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is one implication of making natural assets 'common assets' according to Rawls?

    <p>It diminishes the value of individual talents</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    Rawls's Hypothetical Contract Argument

    • Rawls presents a hypothetical contract argument asserting that outcomes from such a contract are just.
    • This idea is flawed; a hypothetical contract where one person gives all possessions for a book is not just.
    • Rawls's contract needs justification beyond other hypothetical contracts.

    The Original Position: A Device of Representation

    • Rawls argues his hypothetical contract is privileged because the "original position" is fair.
    • The original position is a "device of representation" where each element represents a universally accepted or potentially acceptable moral belief.
    • Examples include ignoring sex (reflecting anti-discrimination) and impartiality through ignorance.

    Constraints on the Original Position

    • Two constraints govern the original position:
      • Its elements (knowledge, ignorance) must reflect generally accepted moral beliefs.
      • The position must lead to agreement among participants.

    Criticism of Rawls's Primary Goods

    • Rawls requires contracting parties to value primary goods (liberty, opportunity, wealth, income, self-respect).
    • These are presented as rational, all-purpose means regardless of personal desires.
    • Criticism argues these goods are not neutral, favoring commercial, capitalist societies.
    • Alternative, non-commercial, communal forms of existence might prioritize different, non-capitalistic values.

    Criticism of Ignorance of Natural/Social Assets

    • Rawls makes parties ignorant of their natural/social assets (talent, wealth) to achieve agreement.
    • He argues these assets are morally arbitrary: no one deserves their traits/background.
    • This idea is then modelled by making these assets "common assets".
    • A counter-argument is that individuals deserve some reward for using and developing their talents.

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Description

    Explore the complexities of Rawls's hypothetical contract argument and its implications for justice. This quiz examines the original position as a device of representation and the constraints it faces. Dive into critical perspectives that question the validity of Rawls's claims and the foundation of his moral philosophy.

    More Like This

    Rawls' Theory of Justice Quiz
    18 questions
    John Rawls' Theory of Justice
    8 questions
    Teoría de la Justicia de John Rawls
    8 questions
    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser