Public Employees' Right to Immunity and the Exclusionary Rule

ReceptiveAstrophysics avatar
ReceptiveAstrophysics
·
·
Download

Start Quiz

Study Flashcards

18 Questions

In the context of mental health emergencies, when can police officers enter a private home to place an EDP into protective custody?

When a clinician issues a commitment order

What is the primary criterion for involuntary commitment in mental health emergencies?

Likelihood of serious harm due to mental illness

Under what circumstances can officers seek consent to enter a home during a mental health emergency?

If exigent circumstances make it necessary

What role do clinicians play in the process of involuntary commitment orders?

Issuing commitment orders in emergencies

What differentiates the decision-making process for taking an EDP into custody in category 3 compared to categories 1, 2, and 4?

Probable cause that the EDP poses a 'likelihood of serious harm'

What is the main responsibility of police officers when transporting an EDP during mental health emergencies?

Transporting the EDP to an appropriate local facility

What is the 'exclusionary rule' mentioned in the text?

A rule that makes obtaining tainted evidence inadmissible at trial.

What is one main reason opponents of the exclusionary rule are concerned about?

It can allow guilty individuals to avoid punishment.

In which scenario would 'attenuation doctrine' apply?

When evidence is obtained after an initial improper police action is separated by time or events.

Why would statements made by an individual inside their home after an improper arrest not be admissible in court according to the text?

Because an improper arrest taints everything related to the arrest, including statements made inside the home.

What would be a situation where 'intervening event' could make evidence admissible?

When there is an initial bad stop but then a new event occurs, leading to the discovery of evidence.

Why might the exclusionary rule be considered controversial according to the text?

Proponents believe it holds police accountable while opponents think it allows guilt to escape punishment.

What is the primary purpose of proper booking procedures after an arrest?

To identify the arrestee

In what situations can officers and caseworkers enter an elder's residence without consent, according to the text?

In an emergency or with a court order only

Under what conditions may animals be placed in protective custody for animal cruelty as per the text?

When they are confined in a vehicle under extreme heat or cold conditions

When does an arrestee have the right to make a telephone call as per the text?

Within one hour of arrival at the police station

What is the consequence if evidence is gained from intentionally withholding an arrestee's phone call?

The evidence is suppressed

What is the role of officers during a child transfer to DCF custody as stated in the text?

To accompany DCF employees, keep peace, and ensure safe removal of the child

This quiz covers topics such as the use of derivatives of immunity for federal employees, the right to counsel during arraignment or indictment in Massachusetts, and the landmark case of Mapp v. Ohio which introduced the exclusionary rule. Learn about the arguments for and against the exclusionary rule in holding police accountable.

Make Your Own Quizzes and Flashcards

Convert your notes into interactive study material.

Get started for free

More Quizzes Like This

Immunity Explained
50 questions

Immunity Explained

BoundlessObsidian4130 avatar
BoundlessObsidian4130
Immunity Quiz
48 questions
Immunity and Infections in Medicine
71 questions
Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser