Principle of Self-Determination in International Law
16 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

Which historic event is NOT associated with the principle of self-determination?

  • Independence of South Sudan
  • Independence of colonial territories post-World War II
  • Establishment of the European Union (correct)
  • Dissolution of the Austro-Hungarian Empire
  • The international law recognizes the right to secession in all circumstances.

    False

    What legal document acknowledges the right of 'peoples' to self-determination?

    UN Charter

    The International Court of Justice's advisory opinion on Kosovo emphasized a right to independence for non-self-governing peoples under _______ domination.

    <p>alien</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Match the following documents with their relevant focus:

    <p>UNDRIP = Rights of Indigenous Peoples ILO Convention No. 169 = Indigenous Rights in State Frameworks 1993 Vienna Declaration = Self-determination under colonial domination UN Declaration on Principles of International Law = Territorial integrity and self-determination</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What primary issue does the principle of self-determination often create?

    <p>Tension between independence aspirations and state territorial integrity</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Self-determination always implies the right to secession.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Name one instrument that recognizes the rights of indigenous peoples to self-determination.

    <p>ILO Convention No. 169</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does Article 20 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights address?

    <p>Self-determination in the context of oppression</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The African Commission has explicitly defined 'peoples' within the African Charter.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the outcome of the Katangese Peoples’ Congress v Zaire case?

    <p>The African Commission rejected the Katangese claim for independence.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The _______ Declaration reaffirmed the inviolability of borders inherited at independence.

    <p>1999 Algiers</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Match the following cases with their primary focus:

    <p>Katangese Peoples’ Congress v Zaire = Secession and independence claims Kevin Mgwanga Gunme v Cameroon = Marginalization and discrimination Awas Tingni v Nicaragua = Land and resource rights Saramaka People v Suriname = Communal property and development</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is one reason the African Commission upheld Cameroon’s territorial integrity in the Kevin Mgwanga Gunme case?

    <p>Insufficient grounds for secession</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Indigenous groups in the Americas largely focus on secession rather than land rights.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What principle constrains the right to self-determination in many African contexts?

    <p>Territorial integrity</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    The Principle of Self-Determination

    • A cornerstone of international law, enshrined in the UN Charter and International Covenants, granting independence and self-governance to oppressed groups.
    • Controversial due to its potential tension with the territorial integrity of existing states.
    • Central to historical events like the dissolution of empires (Austro-Hungarian, Ottoman) and post-WWII decolonization, including South Sudan's independence.

    Universal Recognition and Limits

    • The UN Declaration on Principles of International Law (DPIL) acknowledges the right of peoples to self-determination, but limits secession to cases not violating state equality and non-discrimination.
    • The 1993 Vienna Declaration similarly upholds self-determination for peoples under colonial or foreign domination while preserving state integrity.
    • The ICJ's advisory opinion on Kosovo's independence acknowledges a right to independence for non-self-governing peoples under alien domination.
    • However, the ICJ avoided ruling on the permissibility of secession outside this context, leaving this interpretation open to debate.
    • Especially relevant in regions with colonial-era borders, like Africa.

    Self-Determination Beyond Secession

    • Self-determination doesn't necessitate secession.
    • Indigenous and tribal peoples seek internal self-determination, focusing on autonomy, ancestral land rights, and resources control.
    • Instruments like ILO Convention No. 169 and the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) recognize these rights within state frameworks.

    African Approaches to Self-Determination

    • The African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights differentiates between peoples under oppression (external self-determination) and others (internal self-determination within existing states).
    • Focuses on decolonization and apartheid, avoiding a precise definition of "peoples" while extending rights to indigenous and tribal groups.

    Key Cases in African Jurisprudence

    • Katangese Peoples’ Congress v Zaire (1995): Secession justified only by severe human rights violations and lack of governance participation.
    • Kevin Mgwanga Gunme v Cameroon: Southern Cameroonians sought self-determination, but the African Commission upheld Cameroon's territorial integrity.

    Indigenous Peoples in The Americas

    • Focus on land and resource rights rather than secession.
    • Cases like Awas Tingni v Nicaragua and Saramaka People v Suriname emphasize indigenous rights to communal property and development.
    • The Inter-American Court of Human Rights links self-determination to land use, participation, and environmental safeguards.

    Balancing Emancipation and Sovereignty

    • Self-determination remains constrained by commitments to territorial integrity, particularly in Africa.
    • The 1999 Algiers Declaration reaffirmed inviolability of borders inherited at independence.
    • Secession generally permitted only as a remedy for severe oppression or human rights violations, despite recognized collective rights rooted in identity, history, and tradition.

    Conclusion

    • Self-determination continues to evolve as a principle, balancing the aspirations of peoples with the realities of state sovereignty.
    • Its interpretation remains context-dependent, reflecting the complexities of reconciling historical grievances with international stability.

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Description

    Explore the foundation of the principle of self-determination in international law, focusing on its implications for independence and governance of oppressed groups. This quiz will cover historical contexts, legal developments, and the balance between self-determination and state integrity.

    More Like This

    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser