Self-Determination in International Law
16 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What is a key aspect of the principle of self-determination in international law?

  • It only applies to movements seeking complete independence.
  • It prohibits all forms of secession.
  • It recognizes the right to self-governance for oppressed groups. (correct)
  • It is irrelevant in the context of historical state formation.
  • What does the UN Declaration on Principles of International Law state regarding secession?

  • It can be invoked against states fulfilling equality principles.
  • It fully endorses the right to secession for all peoples.
  • It limits the right of secession for compliant states. (correct)
  • Secession is always valid if a group claims it.
  • How did the Kosovo case influence the perception of self-determination?

  • It recognized independence for all non-self-governing peoples unequivocally.
  • It dismissed the notion of self-determination entirely.
  • It clarified that all forms of secession are legal under international law.
  • It highlighted the right to independence under specific contexts of alien domination. (correct)
  • What is meant by 'internal self-determination'?

    <p>Autonomy and control over ancestral lands and resources.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which international instrument acknowledges the right to self-determination for indigenous peoples?

    <p>ILO Convention No. 169.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What dilemma does the principle of self-determination often present?

    <p>Between collective independence and state territorial integrity.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the major outcome of the dissolution of the Austro-Hungarian and Ottoman Empires?

    <p>Creation of new states through the principle of self-determination.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Why is the principle of self-determination considered controversial?

    <p>It often conflicts with established sovereignty of states.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is a key condition for a people to claim external self-determination according to Article 20 of the African Charter?

    <p>Massive human rights violations</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which group did the African Commission recognize in the context of self-determination based on shared characteristics?

    <p>Indigenous and tribal groups</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the case of Katangese Peoples' Congress v Zaire, what was the African Commission's stance on the claim for independence?

    <p>It was rejected, citing lack of massive human rights violations.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was a central focus of the Inter-American human rights system regarding indigenous peoples?

    <p>Land and resource rights</p> Signup and view all the answers

    According to the jurisprudence discussed, self-determination through secession is generally permitted under which circumstances?

    <p>Severe oppression or rights violations</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does the 1999 Algiers Declaration emphasize regarding territorial integrity?

    <p>Borders inherited at independence are inviolable.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following concepts complicates the right to self-determination?

    <p>International commitments to territorial integrity</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the general legal and political stance on self-determination as reflected in the content?

    <p>It evolves while balancing aspirations against state sovereignty.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    The Principle of Self-Determination in International Law

    • Self-determination, a cornerstone of international law, is enshrined in the UN Charter and International Covenants. It grants independence and self-governance to oppressed groups but remains contentious
    • The principle is crucial in historical events like the dissolution of empires after WWI, post-colonial independence movements, and South Sudan's secession.
    • It often clashes with the territorial integrity of existing states.

    Universal Recognition and Territorial Integrity

    • The UN Declaration on Principles of International Law (DPIL) recognizes the right to self-determination but limits secession.
    • It can't be used against states upholding equality and non-discrimination. The 1993 Vienna Declaration also supports this, preserving territorial integrity for compliant states and regarding self-determination of people under colonial rule.
    • The ICJ's advisory opinion on the Kosovo Declaration of Independence highlighted independence rights for non-self-governing peoples under alien control.
    • It avoided ruling on secession outside colonial contexts and "remedial secession". This creates uncertainty and potential for disputes.

    Self-Determination Beyond Secession

    • Self-determination isn't solely about secession.
    • Indigenous and tribal peoples typically seek internal self-determination (autonomy, ancestral land control).
    • Instruments like ILO Convention No. 169 and UNDRIP recognize their rights within existing states. These documents emphasize self-identification and don't automatically grant broader international legal rights.

    African Approaches to Self-Determination

    • The African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights differentiates self-determination types: external (oppressed peoples) and internal (within existing states).
    • The charter emphasizes rights of indigenous and tribal peoples based on shared ancestry, ethnicity, and culture. The African Commission extended these rights.

    Key Cases in African Jurisprudence

    • Katangese Peoples’ Congress v Zaire (1995): Secession is only valid for mass human rights violations or denied representation in government.
    • Kevin Mgwanga Gunme v Cameroon: Southern Cameroonians argued for self-determination but were rejected due to insufficient evidence for secession.

    Indigenous Peoples in the Americas

    • Indigenous groups in the Americas primarily focus on land and resource rights.
    • Cases like Awas Tingni v Nicaragua and Saramaka People v Suriname highlight their rights to communal property.
    • The I-A Court ties self-determination to land use, survival and requires effective participation, equity, and environmental safeguards for their territories.

    Balancing Emancipation and Sovereignty

    • Self-determination faces limitations from territorial integrity commitments, especially in Africa.
    • The 1999 Algiers Declaration reaffirmed the inviolability of inherited borders.
    • Secession is generally only permitted for severe oppression or human rights violations, recognizing collective rights tied to identity.

    Conclusion

    • Self-determination continues to evolve legally and politically, balancing aspirations with state sovereignty. Its interpretation varies widely.

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Description

    Explore the principle of self-determination as a key aspect of international law, detailing its implications in UN Charter and historical contexts. Understand its controversial role in global independence movements and the balance with territorial integrity. Analyze its legal developments, particularly the Kosovo case, and the conditions under which it can be invoked.

    More Like This

    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser