Podcast
Questions and Answers
Which of the following best describes the role of 'mens rea' in criminal law?
Which of the following best describes the role of 'mens rea' in criminal law?
- It outlines the procedures for arresting and detaining individuals suspected of committing a crime.
- It refers to the specific actions that constitute the physical component of a crime, regardless of intent.
- It defines the monetary penalties associated with different classes of felonies.
- It is a required mental state needed to commit a crime. (correct)
In the context of criminal law, what distinguishes recklessness from purely accidental actions?
In the context of criminal law, what distinguishes recklessness from purely accidental actions?
- Recklessness is determined by the severity of the outcome, while accidental actions are not.
- Accidental actions are prosecuted more severely due to their unforeseen consequences.
- Accidental actions are subject to criminal prosecution if they result in significant damages, regardless of intent.
- Recklessness involves a conscious disregard for potential harm, whereas accidental actions do not. (correct)
How does the Wisconsin first-degree reckless homicide statute define the required 'mens rea'?
How does the Wisconsin first-degree reckless homicide statute define the required 'mens rea'?
- Causing death through actions that demonstrate a minor lapse in judgment.
- Planning to cause death without explicitly stating the intention.
- Committing actions that accidentally lead to the death of another person.
- Recklessly causing death with utter disregard for human life. (correct)
Which scenario exemplifies a situation where the 'mens rea' of recklessness would most likely be applied?
Which scenario exemplifies a situation where the 'mens rea' of recklessness would most likely be applied?
What legal conclusion can be made about acts considered purely accidental regarding criminal behavior?
What legal conclusion can be made about acts considered purely accidental regarding criminal behavior?
In what way does the legal treatment of driving under the influence (DUI) differ from crimes requiring a specific 'mens rea'?
In what way does the legal treatment of driving under the influence (DUI) differ from crimes requiring a specific 'mens rea'?
Considering the Wisconsin statutes mentioned, which element is crucial in distinguishing between first-degree murder and first-degree reckless homicide?
Considering the Wisconsin statutes mentioned, which element is crucial in distinguishing between first-degree murder and first-degree reckless homicide?
If a person is aware that their actions could cause harm but consciously chooses to ignore the risk, what level of 'mens rea' is most likely demonstrated?
If a person is aware that their actions could cause harm but consciously chooses to ignore the risk, what level of 'mens rea' is most likely demonstrated?
In the context of cybercrime, what is the primary challenge that jurisdictional issues pose for law enforcement?
In the context of cybercrime, what is the primary challenge that jurisdictional issues pose for law enforcement?
How does the 'detrimental effects' test, as established in Strassheim v. Daily, primarily determine whether a state can exercise jurisdiction over a person who committed crimes outside of that state?
How does the 'detrimental effects' test, as established in Strassheim v. Daily, primarily determine whether a state can exercise jurisdiction over a person who committed crimes outside of that state?
Concerning cybercrime cases, what makes jurisdiction a particularly challenging issue?
Concerning cybercrime cases, what makes jurisdiction a particularly challenging issue?
Which aspect of the 'detrimental effects' test considers the direct link between an action and its harmful outcome within a state?
Which aspect of the 'detrimental effects' test considers the direct link between an action and its harmful outcome within a state?
Given the principles of personal jurisdiction, under what circumstances can a state court typically exercise authority over individuals?
Given the principles of personal jurisdiction, under what circumstances can a state court typically exercise authority over individuals?
In cases of criminal law, when does personal jurisdiction become relevant, particularly concerning acts committed across state lines?
In cases of criminal law, when does personal jurisdiction become relevant, particularly concerning acts committed across state lines?
What three key elements constitute the 'detrimental effects' test used by the U.S. Supreme Court to determine if a state can assert jurisdiction over crimes committed outside its borders?
What three key elements constitute the 'detrimental effects' test used by the U.S. Supreme Court to determine if a state can assert jurisdiction over crimes committed outside its borders?
Considering computer networks transcend geographical boundaries, what specific challenge does this pose for law enforcement in cybercrime investigations regarding the identification and apprehension of criminals?
Considering computer networks transcend geographical boundaries, what specific challenge does this pose for law enforcement in cybercrime investigations regarding the identification and apprehension of criminals?
Why are Nigerian scams particularly challenging for courts to address?
Why are Nigerian scams particularly challenging for courts to address?
What is the key characteristic that defines '419 scams' or 'advance fee fraud' schemes?
What is the key characteristic that defines '419 scams' or 'advance fee fraud' schemes?
How has the evolution of technology changed the landscape of '419' or imposter scams?
How has the evolution of technology changed the landscape of '419' or imposter scams?
What is the primary deceptive tactic used in modern imposter scams to convince victims to send money?
What is the primary deceptive tactic used in modern imposter scams to convince victims to send money?
According to the content, what is the most likely outcome for a victim who advances funds in a Nigerian or imposter scam?
According to the content, what is the most likely outcome for a victim who advances funds in a Nigerian or imposter scam?
Considering the evolution of '419' scams, what makes them particularly insidious in the digital age?
Considering the evolution of '419' scams, what makes them particularly insidious in the digital age?
What is the significance of the reference to the '4-1-9' section of the Nigerian criminal code in the context of these scams?
What is the significance of the reference to the '4-1-9' section of the Nigerian criminal code in the context of these scams?
Why are imposter scams difficult to prosecute when the perpetrators are operating outside the United States?
Why are imposter scams difficult to prosecute when the perpetrators are operating outside the United States?
Which scenario exemplifies a cybercrime where a computer is the target, rather than merely the tool?
Which scenario exemplifies a cybercrime where a computer is the target, rather than merely the tool?
In the context of cybercrime legislation, why are federal laws likely to have a more significant impact than state laws?
In the context of cybercrime legislation, why are federal laws likely to have a more significant impact than state laws?
Which of the following scenarios represents a situation where a computer serves primarily as a witness to a crime?
Which of the following scenarios represents a situation where a computer serves primarily as a witness to a crime?
What is the key distinction between a traditional crime committed using a computer and cybercrime?
What is the key distinction between a traditional crime committed using a computer and cybercrime?
Which action is the least likely to be classified as a cybercrime?
Which action is the least likely to be classified as a cybercrime?
Which of the following best describes the role of a computer in a Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack?
Which of the following best describes the role of a computer in a Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack?
How does the concept of 'cyberstalking' fit into the broader framework of cybercrime?
How does the concept of 'cyberstalking' fit into the broader framework of cybercrime?
Which of the following is the least relevant consideration when determining whether an act constitutes a cybercrime versus a traditional crime involving a computer?
Which of the following is the least relevant consideration when determining whether an act constitutes a cybercrime versus a traditional crime involving a computer?
Which scenario would most likely be a violation of the federal Wiretap Act?
Which scenario would most likely be a violation of the federal Wiretap Act?
An IT administrator discovers a sophisticated intrusion into the company's network. To identify the source, they deploy a tool that captures network packet headers in real-time. Which law governs the access to this transmission information?
An IT administrator discovers a sophisticated intrusion into the company's network. To identify the source, they deploy a tool that captures network packet headers in real-time. Which law governs the access to this transmission information?
A system administrator needs access to an employee's archived emails to investigate a potential data breach. Under what circumstances is accessing these emails permissible without violating the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA)?
A system administrator needs access to an employee's archived emails to investigate a potential data breach. Under what circumstances is accessing these emails permissible without violating the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA)?
A journalist is investigating a story and pays a hacker to intercept the real-time communications of a CEO without a court order. Which parties could potentially face legal consequences under the relevant federal laws?
A journalist is investigating a story and pays a hacker to intercept the real-time communications of a CEO without a court order. Which parties could potentially face legal consequences under the relevant federal laws?
A local police department wants to track the websites visited by a suspect in a kidnapping case in real-time. According to federal law, what steps must they take to legally obtain this information?
A local police department wants to track the websites visited by a suspect in a kidnapping case in real-time. According to federal law, what steps must they take to legally obtain this information?
An intelligence agency is monitoring international communications. They inadvertently intercept purely domestic communications. What legal restrictions apply to the use of those communications?
An intelligence agency is monitoring international communications. They inadvertently intercept purely domestic communications. What legal restrictions apply to the use of those communications?
A disgruntled employee installs a keylogger on their supervisor's computer to gain access to performance reviews before they are officially released. Which law is the employee most likely violating?
A disgruntled employee installs a keylogger on their supervisor's computer to gain access to performance reviews before they are officially released. Which law is the employee most likely violating?
What is the primary distinction between the Wiretap Act and the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA)?
What is the primary distinction between the Wiretap Act and the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA)?
Given the interplay between federal and state jurisdictions in criminal procedure, which of the following scenarios BEST illustrates a permissible divergence in procedural rules?
Given the interplay between federal and state jurisdictions in criminal procedure, which of the following scenarios BEST illustrates a permissible divergence in procedural rules?
A law enforcement agency concludes a complex fraud investigation implicating multiple individuals across different states. Which of the following actions represents the MOST appropriate next step in initiating the criminal process?
A law enforcement agency concludes a complex fraud investigation implicating multiple individuals across different states. Which of the following actions represents the MOST appropriate next step in initiating the criminal process?
A prosecutor possesses substantial evidence suggesting an individual's involvement in a crime, but also recognizes weaknesses in the case that could lead to acquittal. Considering prosecutorial discretion, what would be the MOST ethically sound approach for the prosecutor?
A prosecutor possesses substantial evidence suggesting an individual's involvement in a crime, but also recognizes weaknesses in the case that could lead to acquittal. Considering prosecutorial discretion, what would be the MOST ethically sound approach for the prosecutor?
In a state that utilizes both grand jury indictments and prosecutorial informations, under what circumstance is a grand jury indictment MOST likely to be required rather than an information?
In a state that utilizes both grand jury indictments and prosecutorial informations, under what circumstance is a grand jury indictment MOST likely to be required rather than an information?
A prosecutor decides to pursue charges against an individual based on evidence collected during a law enforcement investigation. Which factor would MOST significantly influence the prosecutor's decision to file a formal information or seek a grand jury indictment?
A prosecutor decides to pursue charges against an individual based on evidence collected during a law enforcement investigation. Which factor would MOST significantly influence the prosecutor's decision to file a formal information or seek a grand jury indictment?
A state's criminal procedure law requires a grand jury indictment for all felony offenses punishable by more than ten years of imprisonment. If a prosecutor believes they have sufficient evidence to charge an individual with such a crime, what is the MOST appropriate course of action?
A state's criminal procedure law requires a grand jury indictment for all felony offenses punishable by more than ten years of imprisonment. If a prosecutor believes they have sufficient evidence to charge an individual with such a crime, what is the MOST appropriate course of action?
A law enforcement officer, during a lawful arrest for drunk driving, discovers a bag of cocaine in the suspect's pocket. This discovery leads to additional charges related to drug possession. How does the principle regarding the commencement of a criminal case apply in this scenario?
A law enforcement officer, during a lawful arrest for drunk driving, discovers a bag of cocaine in the suspect's pocket. This discovery leads to additional charges related to drug possession. How does the principle regarding the commencement of a criminal case apply in this scenario?
In a scenario where a prosecutor is considering charges against an individual, what BEST exemplifies an exercise of prosecutorial discretion that balances the interests of justice with resource constraints?
In a scenario where a prosecutor is considering charges against an individual, what BEST exemplifies an exercise of prosecutorial discretion that balances the interests of justice with resource constraints?
Flashcards
Mens Rea
Mens Rea
The mental state required to commit a crime.
First-degree murder (WI)
First-degree murder (WI)
Causing death with intent; a Class A felony in Wisconsin.
DUI (most states)
DUI (most states)
Operating a vehicle while impaired, regardless of mental state.
Purely Accidental Acts
Purely Accidental Acts
Signup and view all the flashcards
Reckless Actions
Reckless Actions
Signup and view all the flashcards
First-degree reckless homicide (WI)
First-degree reckless homicide (WI)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Government Prosecution
Government Prosecution
Signup and view all the flashcards
Showing of Recklessness
Showing of Recklessness
Signup and view all the flashcards
Imposter Scams
Imposter Scams
Signup and view all the flashcards
Advance Fee Fraud
Advance Fee Fraud
Signup and view all the flashcards
Nigerian Scams
Nigerian Scams
Signup and view all the flashcards
"419" Reference
"419" Reference
Signup and view all the flashcards
Spanish Prisoner Con
Spanish Prisoner Con
Signup and view all the flashcards
Solicitation Method
Solicitation Method
Signup and view all the flashcards
Victim's Loss
Victim's Loss
Signup and view all the flashcards
Jurisdiction Issues
Jurisdiction Issues
Signup and view all the flashcards
Personal Jurisdiction
Personal Jurisdiction
Signup and view all the flashcards
Interstate Criminal Jurisdiction
Interstate Criminal Jurisdiction
Signup and view all the flashcards
Detrimental Effects Test
Detrimental Effects Test
Signup and view all the flashcards
Three Parts of the Detrimental Effects Test
Three Parts of the Detrimental Effects Test
Signup and view all the flashcards
Focus of Detrimental Effects Test
Focus of Detrimental Effects Test
Signup and view all the flashcards
Jurisdiction via Detrimental Effects
Jurisdiction via Detrimental Effects
Signup and view all the flashcards
Jurisdiction & Cybercrime
Jurisdiction & Cybercrime
Signup and view all the flashcards
Challenges of Cybercrime Jurisdiction
Challenges of Cybercrime Jurisdiction
Signup and view all the flashcards
Criminal Procedure Principles
Criminal Procedure Principles
Signup and view all the flashcards
Criminal Investigation
Criminal Investigation
Signup and view all the flashcards
Prosecutor
Prosecutor
Signup and view all the flashcards
Prosecutorial Discretion
Prosecutorial Discretion
Signup and view all the flashcards
Information (legal)
Information (legal)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Grand Jury
Grand Jury
Signup and view all the flashcards
Grand Jury Indictment
Grand Jury Indictment
Signup and view all the flashcards
Felony vs. Misdemeanor
Felony vs. Misdemeanor
Signup and view all the flashcards
Computer as Target
Computer as Target
Signup and view all the flashcards
Computer as Witness
Computer as Witness
Signup and view all the flashcards
Cybercrimes
Cybercrimes
Signup and view all the flashcards
Forgery Example
Forgery Example
Signup and view all the flashcards
Cybercrime Examples
Cybercrime Examples
Signup and view all the flashcards
Denial of Service (DoS)
Denial of Service (DoS)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS)
Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Federal Cyber Laws
Federal Cyber Laws
Signup and view all the flashcards
Interception of Communications Laws Definition
Interception of Communications Laws Definition
Signup and view all the flashcards
Federal Wiretap Act (1968)
Federal Wiretap Act (1968)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Communications Covered by Wiretap Act
Communications Covered by Wiretap Act
Signup and view all the flashcards
Pen Register and Trap and Trace Statute
Pen Register and Trap and Trace Statute
Signup and view all the flashcards
Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA)
Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA)
Signup and view all the flashcards
ECPA Governs Access To:
ECPA Governs Access To:
Signup and view all the flashcards
Wiretap Act Focus
Wiretap Act Focus
Signup and view all the flashcards
Pen Register Focus
Pen Register Focus
Signup and view all the flashcards
Study Notes
- Criminal law defines unacceptable behavior, created by federal and state governments.
- Tort law addresses wrongful acts causing harm, enabling individuals to sue.
- The chapter focuses on how computers are involved in cybercrime and tort activities.
- Criminal and tort law actions can sometimes be carried out against the same individual for the same actions.
General Criminal Law Concepts
- Cybercrimes are instances that involve the internet or computers as mediums for criminal activity.
- Crimes like computer trespass are prosecuted using existing laws extended to new tech.
- Federal judges sentence computer hackers and those posting illicit videos to prison.
- Hacking groups may be charged with website hijacking.
- Cyberextortion involves attempting to extort companies through threats like spam messages.
- A crime violates society's code of conduct.
- The American legal system is based largely on English common law, with the U.S. Constitution as the main source of law.
- Congress and state have laws for criminal offenses.
- Federal government prosecutes federal law violations, while state governments handle state law.
Main Principles of Criminal Law
- Criminal law seeks deterrence through punishment and rehabilitation, differing from civil law's compensation for injuries.
- Substantive criminal law defines conduct constituting a crime and establishes penalties.
- Governments can specify criminal penalties in the same statute that defines a crime or in a separate penalty statute.
- Wrongful conduct is in two basic types: acts universally wrong and acts wrong because they are prohibited.
- "Mala in se" refers to conduct inherently wrong like murder and rape.
- "Mala prohibita" defines conduct society prohibits, such intellectual property and traffic law violations.
- Cybercrimes often fall under mala prohibita.
- Crimes are grouped into misdemeanors (less severe, punishable by up to 1 year in prision) and felonies (more serious, punishable by over a year in prision).
- Jurisdictions can prosecute crimes as either a misdemeanor or a felony based on circumstances.
Elements of a Crime
- Criminal law requires a guilty mind ("mens rea") alongside the criminal act ("actus reus"), and conduct harms society.
- A government must prove "mens rea", "actus reus", and causation to show a crime.
- "Mens rea" refers to a person's intent to commit a crime, requiring knowing, intentional, or reckless engagement.
- "Actus reus" is the wrongful act, and must be voluntary.
- A wrongful act also covers the failure to act when there's a responsibility to do so.
Jurisdiction
- Courts can only hear cases within their jurisdiction which is the authority to hear, which include:
- Subject matter: the power of a court to decide certain cases.
- Personal: the ability to exercise power over a defendant.
- Federal courts have jurisdiction over federal laws and disputes between citizens of different states.
- State courts decide cases about state laws or actions within their boundaries.
- State courts exercise personal jurisdiction over those committing acts within the state.
- The "detrimental effects" test determines if a state can have jurisdiction over a person who committed crimes outside of the state provided that their acts caused harm within the state
- Cybercrimes and jurisdiction is challenging, as the internet crosses many geographic boundaries.
- International cooperation, such as the Council of Europe Convention on Cybercrime, is essential for cybercrime investigations.
Criminal procedure
- Governs how governments prosecute individuals, ensuring due process.
- Due process guarantees a fair and consistent process in the courts.
- Criminal procedure safeguards defendants' constitutional rights.
- Prosecutors play a critical role in deciding whether to press charges and file informations or get grand jury indictments.
- The initial hearing (arraignment) begins the formal court process, informing the defendant of the charges and rights.
- After arraignment, the defendant can enter a plea of guilty, not guilty, or nolo contendere.
- After the arraignment, the prosecution and the defendant attorneys will begin the discovery process where each side releases evidence.
- The government bears the highest burden of proof where its expected to prove someone's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt
- Punishments can include jail time, probation, financial penalties, or even death sentences.
Common Criminal Laws Used in Cyberspace
Electronic devices have four roles in crime, these are:
- Used to Commit a crime
- Facilitate a crime
- are the Target of the crime
- are a witness Cybercrimes use computers as a medium or target. Federal laws have the most significant impact due to the internet's global reach. Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) passed in 1984, identifies computer crimes as distinct offenses, providing both criminal and civil penalties. Congress addressed computer-related offenses in a single act and limited the scope of protected computers to interstate and foreign commerce. Under the CFAA essentially any computer connected to the internet is a protected computer because the internet facilitates commerce between different states. CFAA treats protected computers as crime victim.
Computer trespass or intrusion
- The CFAA is the main federal law addressing cybercrime
- Some laws such as the CFAA expand definition to include computers used in interstate commerce
- State laws many also have computer trespass statutes that prohibit unauthorized access to computer systems or networks
- Many states consider intentionally entering a computer network without permission a crime
- Most trespass statutes don't address computer tampering or injection of viruses
Theft of information
- Theft of information via computer networks is on the rise in financial of personal data
- Financial gain is the motive for the crimes
- The 1998 Identity Theft and Assumption Deterrence Act makes identity theft a federal crime
- Investigations are lead by the U.S. Secret Service, FBI, U.S. Postal Inspection Service, and Social Security Administration's Office of the Inspector General
Interception of Communications Laws
- Laws forbid eavesdropping technologies without a court order.
- Communications include email, radio, electronic communications, data transmission, and telephone calls.
- The Wiretap Act governs real-time interception of communications. -Communications covered include email, radio communications, data transmissions, and telephone calls.
- The Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA; 1986) the right to govern access to communications.
- The ECPA governs data transmissions and access to communications content.
Spam and Phishing Laws
- The CAN-SPAM Act covers unsolicited commercial email messages
- Spam is unsolicited electronic junk mail
- The CAN-SPAM Act has both civil and criminal provisions where the US department of Justice can prosecute hackers who use illegal email.
- The FTC enforces the civil pro visions of the CAN-SPAM Act and the same way they enforce unfair trade.
- The Act also details criminal provisions and penalties such as for accessing another's computer without permission to send spam
Cybersquatting
- Cybersquatting involves bad-faith registration of domain names that are trademarks.
- The Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA) protects trademarks names.
- To prove cybersquatting, the plaintiff must show that it was done in bad faith, that their conduct was done in bad faith, and with the intention to profit from the registration.
Malicious Acts
Common acts consist of malware, worms, viruses, and Trojan horses that can be prosecured under the CFAA Cyberstalking: the use of the internet to stalk another in threatening way
- State laws also tackle traditional stalking and cyberstalking in addition to:
- The Telephone Harrassment Act
- The Interstate Stalking and Prevention Act -The Interstate Communications Act
Well-Known Cybercrimes
- The CFAA is the main act use for federal prosecution of cybercrime
- The Morris worm and the Melissa virus are examples of some of the first illegal pieces of software on the web.
General Tort Law Concepts
- A tort is a wrongful act harming a person, leading to lawsuits for damages where injuries are reasonably recoved.
- Tort law has evolved mainly form English common law
- Tort law follows reasonable person standards
- There are three types of torts: strict liability, negligance and intentional
Strict Liability and Negligence Torts
- Strict liability means being responsible for actions regardless of intent or negligance (in unreasonably dangerous situations)
- Negligence torts means a person is reliable for anyone that their consequences could forseeably hart, and a plaintiff has to show the defendent owed a duty of due care. -Duty of due is a person's obligation to avoid acts can harm others
- Plainfiff must also show that the defendant breached the duty of due care, caused injures, and that those injures are compensable
Intentional Torts
- Intentional torts are when the defendant intended to perform a harmful act
- Intentional torts have many shared elements with crime
- A common defense to an intentional tort is that the plaintiff consented to the harmful action.
Civil Procedure
- Used when a plaintiff has to sue in a civil lawsuit to recover for tort injuries
- Law in procedure vary from one jurisdiction to the other
- Civil action begins when defendant files a complaint with the court containing a short statement of the incident and showing that the person who committed the incident is entitled to relief
- This is initiated by filing the case to begin collecting the correct information which happens in stages
- Plaintitt must make sure that the information is being asked for in a related topic
Electronic Discovery
- Electronic data can be important evidence, especially with information being stored digitally
- It used to be that the party trying to find the data had to make sure that it was presented correctly
- E-Discovery allows you to recover the data in its native state
- If a law suit arises, parties are obligated to preserve certain types of evidence, which in the modern day includes Electronically Stored Information or ESI
- If someone destroys the evidence to avoid penalty and a court finds out then a party can sanction a party if its determined they where maliciously avoiding paying the penalties through not following these rules
Common Tort Law Actions in Cyberspace
- "Cybertorts" are torts arising from online interactions.
- Traditional tort law principles apply on online interactions.
- Defamation is an intentional tort, occurs when someone speaks or publishes a false statement about another person that injures that person's reputation.
- Libel covers written defamation
- Slander includes oral defamation
- A protection for these is truth because you can call people out on the internet, making it more easy to file a lawsuit
- Defamation doesn't cover statements of opinion, and you do have responsibility as a content provider under section 230
- One of the biggest cases of defamation is when someone posts photos online creating another issue
Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
- IIED is known as the tort of outrage from actions being offensive to a reasonable person. To prove this a plaintiff must show:
- The defendant acted intentionally or recklessly.
- The defendant’s conduct was extreme and outrageous.
- The defendant’s conduct caused the plaintiff severe emotional distress.
Trespass Torts
Trespass torts involve trespass on land and trespass to chattels which consists of personal property damages. Court have also extended these to online situations like spam.
Privacy Torts
- Four are :
- Intrusion into seclusion
- Portrayal in a false light.
- Appropriation of likeness or identity.
- Public disclosure of private facts.
- Courts recognize privacy rights in electronic communication and equipment.
- Some questions that stay consistant with all privacy torts are:
- a people having a true right of privacy in their use of the internet
- people staying being responsible and not going to far
- the court cases or laws that could apply in specific situations
Case Studies and Examples
- A CAN-SPAM act case the US government tried in 2004 involved an LLC sending spam about phony diet products which resulted in over a million messages getting sent out and years of prison time
- There were tons of websites that have defamed a-lot of people with "gossip websites"
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.
Related Documents
Description
Explore the role of 'mens rea' in criminal law, focusing on recklessness and its implications. Distinguish recklessness from accidental actions, examining relevant statutes like Wisconsin's first-degree reckless homicide law. Analyze scenarios and legal conclusions regarding intent and criminal behavior.