Mens Rea in Criminal Law
10 Questions
2 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to Lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What is required by the prosecution to establish in specific intent crimes like murder?

  • Intention (correct)
  • Negligence
  • Causation
  • Recklessness

    • In the case of Hyam v DPP, what did the court rule regarding the defendant's actions?

  • The defendant intended to cause harm
  • The defendant lacked intent (correct)
  • The defendant was not aware of the consequences
  • The defendant only acted recklessly

    • According to R v Moloney, what did the trial judge incorrectly tell the jury about intention?

  • Intention is irrelevant in criminal cases
  • Intent can be inferred from actions alone
  • Intention can be based on desire alone
  • Intention requires foreseeing the consequences (correct)

    • What did the House of Lords (HOL) disapprove in the direction given to the jury in R v Moloney?

    <p>The instruction that foreseeing consequences equals intention (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What did Lord Bridge suggest as a general rule regarding jury directions on the meaning of intention?

    <p>Jury should not be directed about the meaning of intention (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In Hyam v DPP, why was the defendant convicted despite not intending for the tragic outcome?

    <p>The defendant acted with full knowledge of the likely outcome (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What did R v Moloney clarify about foreseeing consequences and intention?

    <p>'Foreseeing' does not automatically mean 'intending' (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    'Foreseeing a consequence as being a natural consequence' is relevant to which type of intention according to L. Bridge's questions?

    <p>'Oblique' or 'indirect' intention (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    'Was death or serious injury a natural consequence of the defendant's voluntary act?' - This question helps determine...

    <p>'Direct' or 'specific' intention (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    'Did the defendant foresee that consequence as being a natural consequence of his act?' - This question relates to understanding...

    <p>'Direct' or 'specific' intention (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Flashcards

    Specific Intent in Murder

    The prosecution must prove the defendant intended to kill or cause serious harm.

    Hyam v DPP Ruling

    Defendant was convicted even without intending the tragic outcome, highlighting the knowledge of likely consequences.

    Moloney's Incorrect Jury Direction

    The trial judge wrongly equated foreseeing consequences with intending them.

    House of Lords Disapproval (Moloney)

    The House of Lords criticized the judge's instruction on intention in the Moloney case.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Lord Bridge's General Rule

    Avoid directly defining intention for juries; use specific questions instead.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Oblique/Indirect Intention

    Intention where the consequence was a natural outcome, even if not the primary aim.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Direct/Specific Intention

    Intention where the consequence was the desired outcome of the defendant's actions.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Natural Consequence Question

    Was the serious harm a natural outcome of the defendant's voluntary act?

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Foreseen Natural Consequence Question

    Did the defendant foresee the serious harm as a natural consequence of their act?

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Foresight and Intention (Relation)

    'Foresight' of a consequence doesn't automatically mean intent.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    More Like This

    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Open
    Browser
    Browser