Judicial Terms from 12 Angry Men

Judicial Terms in "12 Angry Men"

• Acquittal: Legal term for a declaration of not guilty, resulting in the release of the defendant.
• Appall: To evoke feelings of horror or dismay, often related to shocking evidence or situations in court.
• Bigot: Refers to individuals who display intolerance and prejudice, potentially influencing jury perspectives.
• Defendant: The individual accused in a court trial, central to the case being deliberated.
• Defense: The legal response provided by the defendant against the charges brought by the prosecution.
• Dogged: Describes a persistent attitude, often seen in the deliberation process of the jury, indicating determination.
• Evidence: Essential facts presented in court to establish the truth, considered by judges or juries before ruling.
• Homicide: Refers to the act of killing another person, with intentional homicide classified as murder.
• Jury: A selected group responsible for evaluating evidence in court and making a verdict based on their findings.
• Premeditate: The act of planning a crime or action beforehand, significant in determining the nature of a homicide.
• Proof: The means of establishing truth in a legal context, crucial for achieving a conviction or acquittal.
• Prosecution: The legal entity that brings charges against the defendant, aiming to prove guilt in court.
• Sadism: A psychological disorder characterized by deriving pleasure from inflicting pain on others, potentially relevant to motives in violent crimes.
• Subservient: Reflects a mindset of submissiveness, which can impact jury dynamics and witness testimonies.
• Superficial: Relates to a lack of depth in understanding or analysis, which can lead to hasty judgments in legal proceedings.
• Testimony: A formal statement made to provide evidence, playing a vital role in shaping the case outcome.
• Verdict: The conclusive decision made by the jury after deliberation, determining the defendant's fate.