Infectious Disease Surveillance and Laboratory Testing
24 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

Infection diagnosis in primary care settings often relies on laboratory testing.

True

In Colombia, most CHIKV-infected patients were clinically confirmed in a laboratory.

False

CHIKV infection can be accurately diagnosed using clinical symptoms alone.

False

Primary care physicians in middle- or low-income tropical countries often have access to laboratory testing.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

Clinical criteria are sufficient for diagnosing CHIKV infection.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

Serological analysis is always required for diagnosing acute CHIKV infection.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

The lack of laboratory confirmation of CHIKV infection increases the need for reliable clinical diagnostic tools.

<p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

Expert consensus is not necessary for creating a diagnostic screening tool based on clinical symptoms.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

Serological confirmation is always available in a primary care setting.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

Chikungunya virus diagnosis is only challenging in areas where Zika virus is present.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

Clinical criteria are not necessary for diagnosing Chikungunya infection in a primary care setting.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

Clinicians can easily diagnose acute Chikungunya infection based on symptoms alone.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

Primary care physicians can rely solely on laboratory tests to diagnose Chikungunya infection.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

The clinical diagnosis of Chikungunya infection is only possible in tertiary care settings.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

The presence of Zika virus does not affect the diagnosis of Chikungunya infection.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

Acute Chikungunya infection can be diagnosed with certainty using only laboratory tests.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

The study included patients with unconfirmed CHIKV infection.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

The screening tool created used serological analysis as a diagnostic criterion.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.95.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

The screening tool had a sensitivity of 90%.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

The study developed a screening tool for CHIKV diagnosis using laboratory tests.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

The primary care physician is not the target audience for the screening tool.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

The screening tool requires a score ≥ 10 to be considered positive for CHIKV infection.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

The study only included patients from a tertiary care setting.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

Study Notes

Laboratory Testing for Chikungunya Virus (CHIKV)

  • CHIKV diagnosis is a challenge in areas where Zika virus and/or Dengue virus are present due to lack of access to laboratory testing in many middle- or low-income tropical or subtropical countries.
  • In Colombia, only 1.08% of CHIKV-infected patients (5231 out of 482,326) were clinically confirmed in a laboratory between 2014 and 2019.

Clinical Diagnosis of CHIKV

  • The need for a reliable clinical diagnostic tool is essential for primary care physicians where common arboviral diseases caused by CHIKV, ZIKV, and DENV are endemic or epidemic.
  • A diagnostic screening tool was created using clinical symptoms such as symmetric arthritis, fatigue, rash, and ankle joint pain.

Tool Performance

  • The screening tool identified a cut-off value, and a score ≥ 5.5 was considered positive for identifying CHIKV patients.
  • The tool showed a sensitivity of 64.4%, specificity of 87.4%, positive predictive value of 85.5%, negative predictive value of 67.7%, and an accuracy of 75%.
  • The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.72.

Conclusion

  • A clinical diagnostic tool was developed to aid primary care physicians in diagnosing CHIKV using only clinical symptoms.
  • The tool provides a reliable aid for primary care physicians in areas where serological confirmation is not available.

Studying That Suits You

Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

Quiz Team

Description

This quiz covers the importance of laboratory testing in directing public health care policies, confirming clinical diagnoses, and conducting accurate infectious disease surveillance, especially in low-income tropical or subtropical countries.

Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser