Podcast
Questions and Answers
In the context of the Beauty Contest Game, what does the 'Key Insight' refer to?
In the context of the Beauty Contest Game, what does the 'Key Insight' refer to?
- The game's outcome is unpredictable, as players' choices are influenced by random factors and incomplete information.
- The iterative process of reducing guesses by players ultimately leads to a Nash Equilibrium where everyone chooses the number 0. (correct)
- Rational players will continue to increase their guesses, leading to an arbitrarily high Nash Equilibrium.
- Players will initially focus on selecting numbers close to the average, without considering the strategic actions of others.
Which of the following represents a key assumption of the Beauty Contest Game?
Which of the following represents a key assumption of the Beauty Contest Game?
- Players engage in cooperative behavior, coordinating their actions to achieve a mutually beneficial outcome.
- Players are driven solely by self-interest and seek to maximize their own individual gains. (correct)
- Players have access to all information related to market conditions and competitor strategies.
- The game's outcome is determined by luck and chance rather than strategic decision-making.
Which of the following concepts is directly related to the 'Common knowledge of rationality' assumption?
Which of the following concepts is directly related to the 'Common knowledge of rationality' assumption?
- Nash equilibrium (correct)
- Bounded rationality
- Heuristics
- Decoy options
In the context of decision-making, what is a 'Decoy Option'?
In the context of decision-making, what is a 'Decoy Option'?
Which of the following is an example of a heuristic?
Which of the following is an example of a heuristic?
Which of the following is NOT a potential application of game theory concepts?
Which of the following is NOT a potential application of game theory concepts?
How might the assumption of 'Common Priors' affect the outcome of a game?
How might the assumption of 'Common Priors' affect the outcome of a game?
What is the key concept behind the 'Bounded Rationality' assumption?
What is the key concept behind the 'Bounded Rationality' assumption?
In the context of the Prisoner's Dilemma, what is the Nash Equilibrium?
In the context of the Prisoner's Dilemma, what is the Nash Equilibrium?
Which of the following describes weak dominance?
Which of the following describes weak dominance?
In which scenario does the likelihood of defecting increase among players?
In which scenario does the likelihood of defecting increase among players?
What is a characteristic of the Battle of the Sexes game?
What is a characteristic of the Battle of the Sexes game?
When players utilize mixed strategies, what is the process for finding equilibrium?
When players utilize mixed strategies, what is the process for finding equilibrium?
In the environmental agreement example, what condition must be satisfied for no player to deviate from the implementation strategy?
In the environmental agreement example, what condition must be satisfied for no player to deviate from the implementation strategy?
What is the consequence of pre-play discussion on defection likelihood?
What is the consequence of pre-play discussion on defection likelihood?
Which player strategy is strictly better for the row player in the Prisoner's Dilemma?
Which player strategy is strictly better for the row player in the Prisoner's Dilemma?
Flashcards
Prisoner's Dilemma
Prisoner's Dilemma
A situation where two players each have two choices, and both players are better off choosing the same option, but they must decide independently.
Strictly Dominant Strategy
Strictly Dominant Strategy
A strategy that is always better than another strategy, regardless of what the other player does.
Nash Equilibrium
Nash Equilibrium
A situation where no player can improve their outcome by changing their strategy, assuming the other players' strategies remain unchanged.
Weakly Dominant Strategy
Weakly Dominant Strategy
Signup and view all the flashcards
Battle of the Sexes
Battle of the Sexes
Signup and view all the flashcards
Mixed Strategy
Mixed Strategy
Signup and view all the flashcards
Mixed Strategy Equilibrium
Mixed Strategy Equilibrium
Signup and view all the flashcards
Environmental Agreement
Environmental Agreement
Signup and view all the flashcards
Common Knowledge of Rationality (CKR)
Common Knowledge of Rationality (CKR)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Common Priors
Common Priors
Signup and view all the flashcards
Simultaneous Game
Simultaneous Game
Signup and view all the flashcards
Sequential Game
Sequential Game
Signup and view all the flashcards
Study Notes
Prisoner's Dilemma
- Two players independently choose to cooperate (R1/C1) or defect (R2/C2).
- Payoff matrix example (C1, C2 on columns, R1, R2 on rows):
- R1: [10,10, 25,5]; R2: [5,25, 20,20]
- R1 strictly dominates R2 for the row player.
- C1 strictly dominates C2 for the column player.
- Nash Equilibrium is when both players defect (R2, C2).
Nash Equilibrium
- Definition: No player can improve their payoff by unilaterally changing their strategy, assuming other players' strategies remain the same.
- Empirical Observations:
- Men are 24% more likely to defect than women.
- Defection drops 33% with pre-play discussion.
- 3rd-year students are less likely to defect than 1st-year students.
- Economics students show increased tendency to defect.
Weak Dominance
- A strategy weakly dominates another if it yields a payoff at least as good as the other in all scenarios and strictly better in at least one.
- Example matrix (C1, C2 on columns, R1, R2 on rows):
- R1: [10,10, 5,10]; R2: [10,5, 0,0]
Battle of the Sexes
- Two players choose between two outcomes (e.g., Opera vs. Football).
- Preferences are asymmetrical.
- Payoff matrix example (C1, C2 on columns, R1, R2 on rows):
- R1: [0,0, 3,1]; R2: [1,3, 0,0]
Mixed Strategies
- Players assign probabilities to their strategies.
- Example:
- Row player chooses R1 with probability p.
- Column player chooses C1 with probability q.
- Equilibrium is found by equating expected payoffs.
Environmental Agreements
- Scenario: N countries decide on implementing a costly environmental policy.
- Cost of implementation is £5.
- Benefit for all participants is B/N if exactly m countries implement.
- Analysis: If B/N > cost, no player deviates from implementing the policy.
Market Entry
- Scenario: Total fossil fuel market is £F, total renewable market is £R, total energy companies are E.
- Players decide if they enter the fossil fuel or renewable markets.
- Key Question: How many firms will enter the fossil fuel market?
Beauty Contest Game
- Rules: Participants select a number between 0 and 100.
- Winner is closest to 2/3 of the average.
- Key Insight: Rational players reduce guesses iteratively to reach a Nash equilibrium of 0.
Repeated and Sequential Play
- Repeated Games can show cooperation in prisoner's dilemma versions.
- Sequential Play is where later players observe earlier player actions before deciding.
Risk Homeostasis (Risk Thermostat)
- Definition: People adjust their behavior based on their perceived risk.
- Examples:
- Safer equipment leads to riskier behavior
- Drivers with ABS brakes drive faster.
Prospect Theory
- People's decision factors:
- Low probabilities are over weighted.
- Middle probabilities are under weighted.
- Certain outcomes are given more weight (certainty effect).
- Losses are perceived as more strongly than gains (loss aversion).
- Gain risk aversion, loss risk-seeking.
- Examples:
- Avoiding risk when a disease probability doubles (from 1% to 2%)
- Sacrificing leisure when the chances of exam success increase (from 99% to 100%).
Incrementalism (Muddling Through)
- Definition: Small, incremental changes instead of radical shifts.
- Advantages: Mistakes are easier to correct.
Key Concepts and Definitions: Bounded Rationality
- Decision makers simplify choices due to limitations in time and cognitive capacity
- Examples: Instead of evaluating all laptop brands, focus on a few options and prioritise key attributes, e.g., battery life, weight.
Decoy Options
- Adding a less attractive choice can make another option more compelling.
- Example: A less expensive 7-day Amsterdam holiday being more attractive than a 10-day Paris trip if an expensive 7-day Amsterdam option is also available.
Heuristics (Fast & Frugal)
- Simple rules for quick decision-making in low-stakes decisions
- Recognition Heuristic: Choose the recognisable option
- Minimalist Heuristic: Use a single attribute to decide
Lexicographic Ordering
- Ranking attributes by importance, selecting the best option based on the most important attribute.
- Example: Cost is the most important factor when selecting a holiday, followed by flight time.
Elimination by Aspects (EBA)
- Setting a threshold for the most important attribute and eliminating options that don't meet it.
- Repeating for the next most important attribute
- Example: Choosing a computer with a price cap (£45m), delivery time (<40 months), and required training
Satisficing
- Stopping the search for options once a good enough option is found.
- Example: Choosing a house with a set price range, distance from work, and garden size, stopping once a suitable option is found
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.
Related Documents
Description
Explore the intricacies of game theory with this quiz on the Prisoner's Dilemma and Nash Equilibrium. Understand concepts such as weak dominance and the effects of gender and student status on defecting behavior. Test your knowledge of strategic decision-making in competitive scenarios.