18 Questions
What type of studies provide a snapshot of the population's health status at a specific point in time?
Cross-sectional studies
Which type of studies are useful for understanding the natural history of diseases and establishing causality?
Cohort studies
What type of studies investigate the relationship between an outcome and one or more exposure factors?
Case-control studies
Which type of studies observe events as they happen without interfering with routine clinical practice?
Observational studies
In which type of study are people that are exposed and not exposed to a risk factor followed up over time to compare the risk of disease between the two groups?
Cohort studies
Which type of study uses averaged measures of population health outcomes?
Ecological studies
Which one of these is a disadvantage of ecological studies?
They cannot establish a causal relationship between a disease and an exposure at the individual level.
What is the ecological fallacy?
Drawing inappropriate conclusions at the individual level based on population data.
What is a common use of ecological studies?
Measuring rates of disease for different geographic areas and relating these rates to area social or physical characteristics.
What level of observation is considered in ecological studies?
Group level
What is examined in ecological studies regarding variability?
Intergroup variability
What is an advantage of ecological studies?
Information is usually available
What type of studies are ecological studies?
Descriptive and non-experimental
Why are ecological studies useful for generating hypotheses?
As they focus on intergroup variability
What does ecological fallacy refer to?
Drawing inappropriate conclusions at the individual level based on population data
What kind of data is examined in ecological studies?
Group data
How are rates of disease typically measured in ecological studies?
For different geographic areas, relating these rates to area social or physical characteristics.
What does the term 'ecological fallacy' mean?
Lie, bias associations that appear true at a population level but are not necessarily true at an individual level.
Study Notes
- Cross-sectional studies are descriptive studies that provide a snapshot of the population's health status at a specific point in time.
- Cross-sectional studies are single examination studies that measure various parameters such as attitudes, behaviors, health conditions, and risk factors in a target population.
- Cross-sectional studies have a sampling frame and may use simple random sampling to select participants.
- Cross-sectional studies can be used to evaluate subgroups or strata within the population.
- Examples of cross-sectional studies include studies about the use of glasses among school-aged children.
- Cohort studies are longitudinal studies where the outcome has not occurred at the start of the investigation.
- In cohort studies, people that are exposed and not exposed to a risk factor are followed up over time to compare the risk of disease between the two groups.
- Cohort studies can be used to calculate relative risk, and they provide valuable information about the incidence of disease in exposed and unexposed groups.
- Cohort studies require a long-term follow-up and are often more expensive and time-consuming than other study designs.
- Case-control studies are retrospective studies that investigate the relationship between an outcome and one or more exposure factors.
- In case-control studies, subjects with the disease of interest are selected as cases, and their previous exposures to the risk factors are investigated.
- The primary statistical measure used in case-control studies is the odds ratio.
- Case-control studies are useful for generating hypotheses about the relationship between an outcome and a risk factor but may be subject to selection, information, and reverse causality biases.
- Ecological studies use averaged measures of population health outcomes.
- Observational studies observe events as they happen without interfering with routine clinical practice and can be descriptive or analytical in design.
- Cross-sectional studies are useful for providing a snapshot of the population's health status, but they cannot establish causality.
- Cohort studies are valuable for understanding the natural history of diseases and establishing causality but are more time-consuming and expensive than other study designs.
- Case-control studies are useful for generating hypotheses about the relationship between an outcome and a risk factor but may be subject to selection, information, and reverse causality biases.
Test your knowledge of ecological studies in research, which involve observing group-level data to generate hypotheses and examine intergroup variability. Learn about the characteristics, uses, and limitations of ecological studies.
Make Your Own Quizzes and Flashcards
Convert your notes into interactive study material.
Get started for free