Criminal Law Duty and Causation Quiz

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

Under which circumstance does an owner of a property have a duty to prevent a crime?

If they are related to the person committing the crime

If they have prior knowledge of potential criminal activity

Only when they are present during the crime

If someone uses their property to commit a crime (correct)

In which case was a defendant found guilty due to not removing a dangerous situation they created?

Fagan

Dyson

White

Miller (correct)

What does the term 'but for' causation imply in the context of factual causation?

The victim would not have suffered harm had the defendant not acted (correct)

The harm was incidental to the defendant's actions

The outcome would have been the same regardless of the defendant's actions

The defendant's actions were entirely irrelevant to the outcome

Which of the following is true regarding assumed duty?

It involves voluntarily assuming responsibility for another's welfare. Signup and view all the answers

What must be established first for causation in a legal context?

Factual causation Signup and view all the answers

Which case exemplifies that a defendant may not be held responsible if a victim would have died regardless?

White Signup and view all the answers

What defines legal causation in the context of criminal law?

An operating and substantial cause of the harm Signup and view all the answers

In R v Stone and Dobinson, what was the controversial duty established?

Duty of care in situational contexts Signup and view all the answers

What is required for a person to be guilty of an offence while intoxicated?

They must have the required mens rea. Signup and view all the answers

What happens if a defendant is involuntarily intoxicated and lacks mens rea?

They must be acquitted. Signup and view all the answers

In the context of transferred mens rea, what does it mean if A shoots at B and kills C instead?

A can be charged with murder due to intent. Signup and view all the answers

Which case illustrated the principle where mens rea and actus reus do not need to coincide perfectly?

Meli v R Signup and view all the answers

How is a defendant treated if they are voluntarily intoxicated but lack mens rea for a crime requiring intention?

They may be convicted of a lesser offence. Signup and view all the answers

What principle is established in the case of Le Brun regarding sequences of events?

A person can be guilty if their actions are part of one sequence, despite lack of intent at all stages. Signup and view all the answers

What is the legal outcome if a defendant possesses mens rea during a chain of events but lacks it during the actus reus?

They can still be convicted of a crime. Signup and view all the answers

What is the primary focus when considering the concept of specific intent?

The defendant’s mental state at the time of the offence. Signup and view all the answers

What is generally regarded as the worst kind of mens rea?

Intent Signup and view all the answers

Which view argues that intention should mean purpose?

Pure intention view Signup and view all the answers

Under the Criminal Justice Act 1967, how should a court determine if a person intended or foresaw a result?

By drawing inferences from all evidence Signup and view all the answers

What is the primary burden of proof on the prosecution regarding intention?

To establish that the defendant had intention beyond a reasonable doubt Signup and view all the answers

What type of crime is arson classified as?

A result-crime Signup and view all the answers

What was the defendant's duty once he became aware of the fire?

To take action to extinguish the fire Signup and view all the answers

What does the Hyam view suggest about foreseeing a result?

It implies the result is intended if foreseen as likely Signup and view all the answers

What does the 'moral elbow room' view suggest regarding jury discretion?

Juries should have discretion when the result is virtually certain Signup and view all the answers

Under which circumstance would the jury apply the Woollin direction?

If death or GBH was a virtually certain result of D's actions Signup and view all the answers

In the case of Steane, what was the conclusion about his intent?

He lacked intent to assist the enemy Signup and view all the answers

What is a characteristic of strict liability offences?

They do not require proof of the mental state of the defendant Signup and view all the answers

Which view states that if a result is foreseen, it is simply intended?

Oblique intention view Signup and view all the answers

What does Lord Diplock emphasize about the defendant's responsibility in the case discussed?

The defendant created the dangerous situation and thus had a duty to resolve it Signup and view all the answers

Which of these statements is true regarding causation in criminal law according to Andrew Simester?

Causation is not relevant in strict liability offences Signup and view all the answers

What aspect does Antony Duff's test of failure emphasize in relation to intent?

The likelihood of achieving the desired outcome Signup and view all the answers

What must a jury determine when considering whether a defendant intended death or GBH?

If the result was extremely likely and the defendant realized this Signup and view all the answers

What does the Criminal Justice Act 1967 state regarding a defendant's intention?

Foresight of a consequence is not the same as intention. Signup and view all the answers

In the example where A shoots B, what is true about A's actions?

A may still be found to have intended to kill B despite the low likelihood of success. Signup and view all the answers

What is the distinction made by the courts regarding intention?

Intention is fundamentally different from motive or desire. Signup and view all the answers

What does the 'virtual certainty' test from the Woollin case aim to assess?

Whether death or serious injury was a foreseeable outcome. Signup and view all the answers

What does the term 'virtually certain' refer to in the context of the virtual certainty test?

The result will occur unless an exceptionally rare incident intervenes. Signup and view all the answers

In relation to intention, which statement is accurate?

Belief that one's action is impossible to produce a result negates intention. Signup and view all the answers

What aspect of intention related to the defendant's act is considered irrelevant?

The likelihood of producing the consequence. Signup and view all the answers

How should juries interpret the notion of intent in murder cases according to legal guidelines?

They should give the term 'intent' its ordinary meaning. Signup and view all the answers

What is mens rea in the context of criminal law?

An intention to cause death or grievous bodily harm Signup and view all the answers

What was the primary issue with the Year and a Day rule?

It did not consider victims on life-support machines Signup and view all the answers

Which test is applied at the borderline between murder and manslaughter?

Woollin test Signup and view all the answers

What significant change did the Law Reform Act 1996 introduce regarding murder liability?

It abolished the requirement for victims to die within a year and a day Signup and view all the answers

What does s.1 of the Homicide Act 1957 state about malice?

Intention to kill or cause grievous bodily harm is required for murder Signup and view all the answers

In Cunningham recklessness, what must be established regarding the defendant's awareness?

The defendant must be aware of the risk that their conduct could cause a particular result Signup and view all the answers

What is one criticism of the Woollin test from critics like William Wilson?

It undermines the objective nature of criminal intent Signup and view all the answers

If A gives B a gentle shove that accidentally leads to B's death, what might be the likely legal outcome for A?

A will only be liable for minor assault Signup and view all the answers

Study Notes

Contractual Duty

Failure to fulfill a contractual obligation can lead to a crime.

Assumed Duty

People voluntarily responsible for another's welfare have a duty to care for them.
Parents have a duty to their child until they turn 18 (e.g., Sheppard).

Ownership or Control of Property

Property owners might have a duty to prevent crimes committed on their property.

Continuing Acts

Fagan: Driving onto a victim's foot and failing to move from it constitutes a continuing act.

Creation of Danger

Creating a dangerous situation creates a duty to prevent resulting harm (Miller).
Outside parent-child relationships, the nature of the relationship isn't relevant. The key is whether one party has taken responsibility for another.
Stone and Dobinson: Duty of care was controversially found to exist.

Situational Offences

Situational offences involve guilt for being in a particular situation or state.
Example: Larsonneur.

Causation

Factual Causation

"But for" test: Harm would not have occurred in the same way at the same time "but for" the defendant's actions.
Dyson: Defendant's actions were the direct cause of death, not the underlying illness.
White: Defendant's actions were not connected to the victim's death, which was caused by another factor.

Legal Causation

"Operating and substantial cause" was a former legal test.
Current test is "but for" the defendant's actions, the harm would not have occurred in the same way at the same time.

Miller [1983] 2 AC 161

Facts: D, a squatter, fell asleep with a lit cigarette, causing a fire. He did nothing to put it out and was convicted of arson.
Issue: Whether D's omission constituted the actus reus of arson.
Reasoning: Creating a dangerous situation and failing to mitigate the risk when aware of it is criminal.

Mens Rea

Some crimes don't require proof of a mental state (strict liability).

Intention

Purpose is needed in most cases, judge normally doesn't need to give specific guidance to the jury; however, Woollin direction applies in cases where the jury would consider intention in the absence of the defendant attempting to, or purposing, killing or causing GBH but where a virtually certain outcome of death or serious injury resulted from the voluntary act of the defendant, and the defendant was aware of this virtual certainty.
The Woollin direction can be difficult to interpret ("virtually certain").
Foresight of a consequence doesn't automatically equate to intention. (Note: S8 of the Criminal Justice Act 1967)
"Pure intention" vs. "moral elbow room" vs. "oblique intention" arguments exist.
Intention is different from motive or desire.
Hyam: Foresight of a likely result can be considered intent.
Intoxication is not a defence for the required mental state. Voluntary vs. involuntary intoxication.

Transferred Mens Rea (Malice)

If aiming for one person/thing but harming another, mens rea can be transferred.

Coincidence of Actus Reus and Mens Rea

Mens rea and actus reus generally need to happen at the same time. However, there is flexibility
Meli v R: A series of events is sufficient to establish liability if part of a preconceived plan.
Le Brun: A series of events is also sufficient without a preconceived plan.

Recklessness

Steane (1947) & *Cunningham' (1982) & Woollin (1999)
S.8 Criminal Justice Act 1967
Law Reform (Year and a Day Rule) Act 1996
Ag's Reference(No.3 of 1994)

Homicide Act 1957

Eliminates liability from other crimes in cases of murder (intent required).

Other Important Notes:

Actus reus is the physical act and mens rea is the mental state.
Some further reading from additional references is suggested. There are additional, potentially relevant cases referenced that were not summarised above.

Studying That Suits You

Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

Description

Test your knowledge on the duties and responsibilities in criminal law regarding property and causation. This quiz will cover key concepts such as 'but for' causation, assumed duty, and legal causation through notable cases like R v Stone and Dobinson. Challenge yourself with important legal principles and landmark decisions.