Podcast
Questions and Answers
What was Peru's argument for refusing to accept Columbia's unilateral qualification?
What was Peru's argument for refusing to accept Columbia's unilateral qualification?
- Peru's lack of interest in treaty law
- The ICJ's decision to reject Columbia's request
- Columbia's lack of acceptance of the treaties under question
- The absence of regional Customary International Law (CIL) to support Columbia's qualification (correct)
According to the ICJ, what was the condition under which Columbia's unilateral qualification could have been accepted?
According to the ICJ, what was the condition under which Columbia's unilateral qualification could have been accepted?
- Full acceptance of the treaties by Peru
- Presence of regional Customary International Law (CIL) (correct)
- Bilateral agreement between Peru and Columbia
- Recognition by the United Nations
What did the ICJ acknowledge in the case involving Peru and Columbia?
What did the ICJ acknowledge in the case involving Peru and Columbia?
- The regional acceptance of Columbia's unilateral qualification
- The existence of regional Customary International Law (CIL) (correct)
- The binding nature of the treaties on Peru
- Peru's refusal to engage in diplomatic discussions
What was Portugal's claim in the 'Case Concerning Right of Passage over Indian Territories'?
What was Portugal's claim in the 'Case Concerning Right of Passage over Indian Territories'?
What was the basis for Portugal's claim in the 'Case Concerning Right of Passage over Indian Territories'?
What was the basis for Portugal's claim in the 'Case Concerning Right of Passage over Indian Territories'?
What was the scope of Portugal's right of passage according to the ICJ in the 'Case Concerning Right of Passage over Indian Territories'?
What was the scope of Portugal's right of passage according to the ICJ in the 'Case Concerning Right of Passage over Indian Territories'?
'Case Concerning Right of Passage over Indian Territories' is significant because:
'Case Concerning Right of Passage over Indian Territories' is significant because:
When can a reservation be withdrawn according to Article 22?
When can a reservation be withdrawn according to Article 22?
What is required for a reservation, objection, or acceptance according to Article 23?
What is required for a reservation, objection, or acceptance according to Article 23?
When is a reservation considered to be made if formulated during treaty signing but pending ratification?
When is a reservation considered to be made if formulated during treaty signing but pending ratification?
What is necessary for the withdrawal of a reservation or objection according to Article 23?
What is necessary for the withdrawal of a reservation or objection according to Article 23?
According to Article 22, when does withdrawal of a reservation become applicable?
According to Article 22, when does withdrawal of a reservation become applicable?
How should an objection to a reservation be withdrawn unless specified otherwise in a treaty?
How should an objection to a reservation be withdrawn unless specified otherwise in a treaty?
What is the role of the Secretariat in handling reservations and objections?
What is the role of the Secretariat in handling reservations and objections?
If an objection is raised to a reservation, when does its withdrawal become operative?
If an objection is raised to a reservation, when does its withdrawal become operative?
What is necessary for an express acceptance of a reservation made previously to confirmation?
What is necessary for an express acceptance of a reservation made previously to confirmation?
When should a withdrawal of objection to a reservation become operative according to Article 22?
When should a withdrawal of objection to a reservation become operative according to Article 22?
