Podcast
Questions and Answers
What was the primary focus of the Commerce Clause as discussed in the early twentieth century?
What was the primary focus of the Commerce Clause as discussed in the early twentieth century?
- Limiting federal regulatory power
- Granting states powers over commerce
- Regulating international trade
- Regulating interstate commerce (correct)
Before 1937, the Supreme Court frequently upheld federal regulation under the Commerce Clause.
Before 1937, the Supreme Court frequently upheld federal regulation under the Commerce Clause.
False (B)
What was the significance of the phrase 'switch in time that saved nine'?
What was the significance of the phrase 'switch in time that saved nine'?
It refers to the change in the Supreme Court's approach to New Deal legislation.
The National Labor Relations Act was upheld in the case of ______ v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.
The National Labor Relations Act was upheld in the case of ______ v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.
Match the following cases with their outcomes:
Match the following cases with their outcomes:
Which factor significantly changed the Supreme Court's interpretation of the Commerce Clause after 1937?
Which factor significantly changed the Supreme Court's interpretation of the Commerce Clause after 1937?
The interpretation of economic activity under the Commerce Clause remained constant during the New Deal era.
The interpretation of economic activity under the Commerce Clause remained constant during the New Deal era.
What was a consequence of the Supreme Court's decisions post-1937 regarding the Commerce Clause?
What was a consequence of the Supreme Court's decisions post-1937 regarding the Commerce Clause?
Which case upheld the Agricultural Adjustment Act by allowing regulation of local activities impacting interstate commerce?
Which case upheld the Agricultural Adjustment Act by allowing regulation of local activities impacting interstate commerce?
The Court's interpretation of the Commerce Clause remained static during the New Deal era.
The Court's interpretation of the Commerce Clause remained static during the New Deal era.
What principle allowed Congress greater latitude in enacting regulations during the New Deal era?
What principle allowed Congress greater latitude in enacting regulations during the New Deal era?
The ______ effects doctrine considers the cumulative impact of local activities on interstate commerce.
The ______ effects doctrine considers the cumulative impact of local activities on interstate commerce.
Match the following cases with their outcomes regarding the Commerce Clause:
Match the following cases with their outcomes regarding the Commerce Clause:
What did the Supreme Court recognize about the definition of 'commerce' during the New Deal era?
What did the Supreme Court recognize about the definition of 'commerce' during the New Deal era?
The principle of deference to congressional findings was evident in the case of ______.
The principle of deference to congressional findings was evident in the case of ______.
The 'switch in time that saved nine' refers to the Supreme Court's increasingly restrictive interpretation of the Commerce Clause.
The 'switch in time that saved nine' refers to the Supreme Court's increasingly restrictive interpretation of the Commerce Clause.
Flashcards
Commerce Clause
Commerce Clause
A provision in the U.S. Constitution granting Congress the power to regulate commerce among the states.
Pre-1937 Commerce Clause Interpretation
Pre-1937 Commerce Clause Interpretation
The Supreme Court often limited the scope of federal power under the Commerce Clause, striking down many New Deal programs.
Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States (1935)
Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States (1935)
A Supreme Court case where the Court invalidated the National Industrial Recovery Act, holding that the regulations exceeded Congress's commerce power.
Post-1937 Commerce Clause Interpretation
Post-1937 Commerce Clause Interpretation
Signup and view all the flashcards
NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. (1937)
NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. (1937)
Signup and view all the flashcards
'Switch in Time that Saved Nine'
'Switch in Time that Saved Nine'
Signup and view all the flashcards
Impact of the 'Switch'
Impact of the 'Switch'
Signup and view all the flashcards
New Deal Era and Commerce Clause
New Deal Era and Commerce Clause
Signup and view all the flashcards
Aggregate Effects Doctrine
Aggregate Effects Doctrine
Signup and view all the flashcards
Deference to Congressional Findings
Deference to Congressional Findings
Signup and view all the flashcards
Expansive Interpretation of 'Commerce'
Expansive Interpretation of 'Commerce'
Signup and view all the flashcards
How did the 'switch in time that saved nine' affect the Commerce Clause?
How did the 'switch in time that saved nine' affect the Commerce Clause?
Signup and view all the flashcards
What was the significance of Wickard v. Filburn (1942)?
What was the significance of Wickard v. Filburn (1942)?
Signup and view all the flashcards
How did the Commerce Clause change in the early 20th century?
How did the Commerce Clause change in the early 20th century?
Signup and view all the flashcards
What is the relationship between the Commerce Clause and the New Deal era?
What is the relationship between the Commerce Clause and the New Deal era?
Signup and view all the flashcards
Why was NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. significant?
Why was NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. significant?
Signup and view all the flashcards
Study Notes
Commerce Clause Evolution During the New Deal
-
Pre-1937: Supreme Court limited federal power under the Commerce Clause, invalidating New Deal programs like the National Industrial Recovery Act (Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States). It viewed activities as local if not directly impacting interstate commerce.
-
Post-1937 (After the "switch in time"): Court adopted a broader interpretation of the Commerce Clause. Key cases like NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. broadened the scope, establishing that activities with significant effects on interstate commerce could be regulated, even if indirect.
Influence of the "Switch"
-
The "switch in time that saved nine" refers to Justice Owen Roberts's shift in stance on New Deal legislation's constitutionality.
-
This shift in the Court's approach to the Commerce Clause led to a more expansive, flexible interpretation.
Principles Emerging from New Deal Cases
-
Aggregate Effects Doctrine: The Court recognized the cumulative impact of local activity on interstate commerce. Even activities seemingly local, like individual wheat farming (Wickard v. Filburn), could be regulated if their combined effect substantially impacted commerce.
-
Deference to Congressional Findings: The Court increasingly relied on Congress's determination of how certain activities affected commerce. This gave Congress greater leeway in regulating commerce.
-
Expansive Interpretation of "Commerce": The definition of "commerce" expanded beyond just movement of goods across states. It encompassed activities impacting the general economic well-being of multiple states.
-
Significance: These developments fundamentally shifted the balance of power between federal and state governments regarding economic regulation, creating a more expansive role for federal power within the framework of the Commerce Clause.
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.
Description
Explore the transformation of the Commerce Clause from pre-1937 limitations by the Supreme Court to a broader interpretation post-1937. The quiz delves into key cases and principles established during the New Deal, including the significant shift in judicial philosophy known as the 'switch in time'.