Commerce Clause Evolution During the New Deal
16 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to Lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What was the primary focus of the Commerce Clause as discussed in the early twentieth century?

  • Limiting federal regulatory power
  • Granting states powers over commerce
  • Regulating international trade
  • Regulating interstate commerce (correct)

Before 1937, the Supreme Court frequently upheld federal regulation under the Commerce Clause.

False (B)

What was the significance of the phrase 'switch in time that saved nine'?

It refers to the change in the Supreme Court's approach to New Deal legislation.

The National Labor Relations Act was upheld in the case of ______ v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.

<p>NLRB</p> Signup and view all the answers

Match the following cases with their outcomes:

<p>Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States = Regulation of local activities struck down NLRB v. Jones &amp; Laughlin Steel Corp. = Broad interpretation of the Commerce Clause upheld National Industrial Recovery Act = Invalidated for exceeding commerce power New Deal programs pre-1937 = Frequently declared unconstitutional</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which factor significantly changed the Supreme Court's interpretation of the Commerce Clause after 1937?

<p>Shifts in key justices' positions (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

The interpretation of economic activity under the Commerce Clause remained constant during the New Deal era.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was a consequence of the Supreme Court's decisions post-1937 regarding the Commerce Clause?

<p>An expansion of federal regulatory powers over the economy.</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which case upheld the Agricultural Adjustment Act by allowing regulation of local activities impacting interstate commerce?

<p>Wickard v. Filburn (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

The Court's interpretation of the Commerce Clause remained static during the New Deal era.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What principle allowed Congress greater latitude in enacting regulations during the New Deal era?

<p>Deference to Congressional Findings</p> Signup and view all the answers

The ______ effects doctrine considers the cumulative impact of local activities on interstate commerce.

<p>aggregate</p> Signup and view all the answers

Match the following cases with their outcomes regarding the Commerce Clause:

<p>Wickard v. Filburn = Local activities can be regulated if they affect interstate commerce NLRB v. Jones &amp; Laughlin Steel Corp. = Labor disputes can be federally regulated due to their impact on commerce United States v. Lopez = Limited federal regulation of gun possession near schools Gonzalez v. Raich = Regulation of local marijuana cultivation in relation to interstate commerce</p> Signup and view all the answers

What did the Supreme Court recognize about the definition of 'commerce' during the New Deal era?

<p>It includes activities affecting the economic conditions of multiple states. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

The principle of deference to congressional findings was evident in the case of ______.

<p>NLRB v. Jones &amp; Laughlin Steel Corp.</p> Signup and view all the answers

The 'switch in time that saved nine' refers to the Supreme Court's increasingly restrictive interpretation of the Commerce Clause.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Flashcards

Commerce Clause

A provision in the U.S. Constitution granting Congress the power to regulate commerce among the states.

Pre-1937 Commerce Clause Interpretation

The Supreme Court often limited the scope of federal power under the Commerce Clause, striking down many New Deal programs.

Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States (1935)

A Supreme Court case where the Court invalidated the National Industrial Recovery Act, holding that the regulations exceeded Congress's commerce power.

Post-1937 Commerce Clause Interpretation

The Supreme Court began to uphold broader interpretations of the Commerce Clause, allowing for expansion of federal regulation.

Signup and view all the flashcards

NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. (1937)

A Supreme Court case where the Court upheld the National Labor Relations Act, finding that labor relations in a large steel corporation had a significant impact on interstate commerce.

Signup and view all the flashcards

'Switch in Time that Saved Nine'

Refers to the shift in the Supreme Court's approach to New Deal legislation, particularly after Justice Owen Roberts changed his stance.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Impact of the 'Switch'

The 'switch' significantly influenced the interpretation of the Commerce Clause, leading to a broader understanding of federal regulatory power.

Signup and view all the flashcards

New Deal Era and Commerce Clause

The New Deal era saw a significant expansion of federal regulation of the economy due to a change in the Supreme Court's interpretation of the Commerce Clause.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Aggregate Effects Doctrine

The idea that even local activities with minimal individual impact on interstate commerce can be regulated if, together, they have a substantial effect.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Deference to Congressional Findings

The Court giving weight to Congress's conclusions about the effects of activities on interstate commerce, allowing Congress more latitude in enacting regulations.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Expansive Interpretation of 'Commerce'

The Commerce Clause was redefined to encompass activities that impact economic conditions across states, not just the movement of goods.

Signup and view all the flashcards

How did the 'switch in time that saved nine' affect the Commerce Clause?

This shift in the Supreme Court's stance led to a broader interpretation of the Commerce Clause, allowing for the regulation of activities indirectly impacting interstate commerce.

Signup and view all the flashcards

What was the significance of Wickard v. Filburn (1942)?

This case affirmed that even local, non-commercial activities like growing wheat for personal use could be regulated if they had a substantial effect on interstate commerce.

Signup and view all the flashcards

How did the Commerce Clause change in the early 20th century?

The Supreme Court expanded its interpretation of the Commerce Clause, allowing Congress greater power to regulate the economy.

Signup and view all the flashcards

What is the relationship between the Commerce Clause and the New Deal era?

The New Deal era witnessed a shift in the Court's interpretation of the Commerce Clause, leading to a significant expansion of federal regulatory power.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Why was NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. significant?

It established that labor relations in a large corporation could affect interstate commerce, justifying federal regulation of labor.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Study Notes

Commerce Clause Evolution During the New Deal

  • Pre-1937: Supreme Court limited federal power under the Commerce Clause, invalidating New Deal programs like the National Industrial Recovery Act (Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States). It viewed activities as local if not directly impacting interstate commerce.

  • Post-1937 (After the "switch in time"): Court adopted a broader interpretation of the Commerce Clause. Key cases like NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. broadened the scope, establishing that activities with significant effects on interstate commerce could be regulated, even if indirect.

Influence of the "Switch"

  • The "switch in time that saved nine" refers to Justice Owen Roberts's shift in stance on New Deal legislation's constitutionality.

  • This shift in the Court's approach to the Commerce Clause led to a more expansive, flexible interpretation.

Principles Emerging from New Deal Cases

  • Aggregate Effects Doctrine: The Court recognized the cumulative impact of local activity on interstate commerce. Even activities seemingly local, like individual wheat farming (Wickard v. Filburn), could be regulated if their combined effect substantially impacted commerce.

  • Deference to Congressional Findings: The Court increasingly relied on Congress's determination of how certain activities affected commerce. This gave Congress greater leeway in regulating commerce.

  • Expansive Interpretation of "Commerce": The definition of "commerce" expanded beyond just movement of goods across states. It encompassed activities impacting the general economic well-being of multiple states.

  • Significance: These developments fundamentally shifted the balance of power between federal and state governments regarding economic regulation, creating a more expansive role for federal power within the framework of the Commerce Clause.

Studying That Suits You

Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

Quiz Team

Description

Explore the transformation of the Commerce Clause from pre-1937 limitations by the Supreme Court to a broader interpretation post-1937. The quiz delves into key cases and principles established during the New Deal, including the significant shift in judicial philosophy known as the 'switch in time'.

More Like This

Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser