Commerce Clause and New Deal Era Analysis
24 Questions
2 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What principle allowed Congress greater latitude in enacting regulations based on their potential impact on interstate commerce?

  • Deference to congressional findings (correct)
  • State sovereignty
  • Aggregate effects doctrine
  • Narrow interpretation of commerce
  • The Supreme Court's decision in Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States upheld the National Industrial Recovery Act (NIRA).

    False

    What did the Court recognize in NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. that justified federal regulation of labor relations?

    Labor disputes in a large corporation could significantly affect interstate commerce.

    The Supreme Court's interpretation of the Commerce Clause expanded during the __________ era.

    <p>New Deal</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Match the following cases with their outcomes regarding the Commerce Clause:

    <p>Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States = Regulations were unconstitutional due to local nature NLRB v. Jones &amp; Laughlin Steel Corp. = Upheld federal regulations based on commerce effects</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was a significant effect of the 'switch in time that saved nine' on the Supreme Court's interpretation?

    <p>An expansive interpretation of the Commerce Clause</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The aggregate effects doctrine supports the regulation of activities based on their indirect effects on interstate commerce.

    <p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In what way did the interpretation of 'commerce' change during the New Deal era?

    <p>It expanded to include activities affecting the economic conditions of multiple states.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which case upheld the National Labor Relations Act and broadened the interpretation of the Commerce Clause?

    <p>NLRB v. Jones &amp; Laughlin Steel Corp.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The Aggregate Effects Doctrine suggests that local activities can be regulated only if they are directly involved in interstate commerce.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the main outcome of Wickard v. Filburn with respect to economic activities?

    <p>Even local activities, such as growing wheat for personal consumption, could be regulated if they had a substantial effect on interstate commerce.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The phrase 'switch in time that saved nine' refers to a shift in the Supreme Court's approach to _______ legislation.

    <p>New Deal</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Match the following Supreme Court cases with their significance regarding the Commerce Clause:

    <p>Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States = Struck down New Deal programs NLRB v. Jones &amp; Laughlin Steel Corp. = Uphold labor regulation under Commerce Clause Wickard v. Filburn = Regulated local activities with substantial effect United States v. Lopez = Limited federal regulation of commerce</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What did the Court's decision in Wickard v. Filburn signify for the regulation of economic activities?

    <p>Local activities could be regulated based on aggregate effects.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The Supreme Court's interpretation of the Commerce Clause has remained consistent since 1937.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What principle emerged from the New Deal-era cases that expanded federal regulatory power?

    <p>Aggregate Effects Doctrine</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does the aggregate effects doctrine allow the Court to consider?

    <p>The cumulative impact of local activities on interstate commerce</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The Supreme Court's interpretation of the Commerce Clause has remained unchanged throughout history.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Name one case that demonstrated the application of the aggregate effects doctrine.

    <p>NLRB v. Jones &amp; Laughlin Steel Corp.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The broader interpretation of commerce includes not just the movement of goods but also activities that can affect the economic conditions of __________.

    <p>multiple states</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which New Deal-era case involved the recognition of the effects of labor disputes on interstate commerce?

    <p>NLRB v. Jones &amp; Laughlin Steel Corp.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The term 'switch in time that saved nine' refers to the Supreme Court's consistent opposition to New Deal policies.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The Commerce Clause grants Congress the power to regulate __________ among the states.

    <p>commerce</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Match the following New Deal-era cases with their respective impact on federal regulation:

    <p>NLRB v. Jones &amp; Laughlin Steel Corp. = Upheld labor relations' effects on interstate commerce Schechter Poultry = Struck down federal regulation on local economic activities Wickard v. Filburn = Expanded federal authority over agricultural production Gibbons v. Ogden = Established federal supremacy in interstate commerce</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    Commerce Clause

    • Grants Congress the power to regulate commerce with foreign nations, among the states, and with Indian tribes.
    • Interpretation has evolved, notably in the early 20th century.
    • Key elements include:
      • Scope of Federal Power: The extent to which Congress can regulate activities affecting interstate commerce.
      • Judicial Review: The Supreme Court's role in reviewing and potentially overturning federal regulations based on the Commerce Clause.
      • Economic Activity: Types of economic activities subject to federal regulation.

    New Deal Era Shift

    • Marked a significant shift in the Supreme Court's interpretation of the Commerce Clause.
    • Before 1937, the Court took a narrow view, striking down many New Deal programs as unconstitutional (e.g., Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States, 1935).
    • The "switch in time" (1937) saw a change in Supreme Court approach impacting New Deal legislation and led to a more expansive interpretation of powers.

    Expanding Federal Power

    • NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. (1937) broadened the scope, upholding the National Labor Relations Act, linking labor relations in large corporations to interstate commerce.
    • Wickard v. Filburn (1942) further expanded regulation, establishing the "aggregate effects doctrine." This allowed regulation even of local activities demonstrably affecting interstate commerce (e.g., growing wheat for personal use).

    Principles from New Deal Cases

    • Aggregate Effects Doctrine: Recognizes the cumulative impact of seemingly local activities on interstate commerce.
    • Deference to Congressional Findings: The Supreme Court often accepts Congress's determination of impact on interstate commerce.

    Narrowing Interpretations Post-New Deal

    • U.S. v. Lopez (1995): Marked a return to a more limited interpretation of the Commerce Clause, holding that gun possession in a school zone was not sufficiently tied to interstate commerce.
    • U.S. v. Morrison (2000): Further limited Commerce Clause power, finding that gender-based violence did not have a sufficient connection to interstate commerce to be regulated federally.

    Key Cases

    • Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States (1935)
    • NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. (1937)
    • Wickard v. Filburn (1942)
    • U.S. v. Lopez (1995)
    • U.S. v. Morrison (2000)
    • Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States (1964)

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Related Documents

    Con Law Final Exam PDF

    Description

    Explore the dynamics of the Commerce Clause and its significant evolution during the New Deal Era. This quiz delves into Congress's powers to regulate commerce and the Supreme Court's changing interpretation, particularly before and after 1937. Gain insights into key cases and their implications for federal regulations.

    More Like This

    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser