BRI and Indo-Pacific Strategies Comparison

<p>Asia, Europe, and Africa (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>They may overlap but do not directly conflict in every case (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>Create economic dependencies through infrastructure investments (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>Focused on maintaining a balance of power through military alliances (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>By advocating for alternative institutions to challenge the US-led order (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>US Indo-Pacific strategy emphasizes trade agreements while BRI focuses on infrastructure (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>Maintain the existing US-led global order and prevent destabilization (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

China's strategy for a global infrastructure network across Asia, Europe, and Africa.

U.S. strategy focusing on containing China's influence in the Indo-Pacific region.

The rivalry between nations focusing on territorial and influence control.

Building networks that strengthen trade and investment among nations.

Efforts by powerful countries to extend their political and economic reach.

A strategy focused on balancing power against China's influence using military alliances and trade agreements.

The BRI aims to make countries economically reliant on China through investments in logistics networks.

Emphasizes enhancing security partnerships and military exercises to deter Chinese influence.

BRI seeks to reshape global governance to reflect China's interests, while the US strategy upholds existing norms.