Structural Neuroplasticity Effects Of Singing In Chronic Aphasia PDF

Research Article: New Research Cognition and Behavior Structural Neuroplasticity Effects of...

Research Article: New Research Cognition and Behavior Structural Neuroplasticity Effects of Singing in Chronic Aphasia Aleksi J. Sihvonen,1,2,3* Anni Pitkäniemi,1* Sini-Tuuli Siponkoski,1 Linda Kuusela,4 Noelia Martínez-Molina,1 Sari Laitinen,5 Essi-Reetta Särkämö,6 Johanna Pekkola,4 Susanna Melkas,3 Gottfried Schlaug,7,8 Viljami Sairanen,4 and Teppo Särkämö1 1 Cognitive Brain Research Unit and Centre of Excellence in Music, Mind, Body and Brain, Department of Psychology and Logopedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki 00014, Finland, 2School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Queensland Aphasia Research Centre and UQ Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD 4072, Australia, 3Department of Neurology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki 00029, Finland, 4HUS Helsinki Medical Imaging Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki 00029, Finland, 5Espoo Hospital, Espoo 00029, Finland, 6Private Choir Conductor, Vantaa 01520, Finland, 7Department of Neurology, UMass Medical School, Springfield, Massachusetts 01655, and 8Department of Biomedical Engineering and Institute of Applied Life Sciences, UMass Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts 01655 Abstract Singing-based treatments of aphasia can improve language outcomes, but the neural benefits of group-based singing in aphasia are unknown. Here, we set out to determine the structural neuroplas- ticity changes underpinning group-based singing-induced treatment effects in chronic aphasia. Twenty-eight patients with at least mild nonfluent poststroke aphasia were randomized into two groups that received a 4-month multicomponent singing intervention (singing group) or standard care Received Oct. 13, 2023; revised Feb. 28, 2024; accepted April 18, 2024. (control group). High-resolution T1 images and multishell diffusion-weighted MRI data were collected The authors declare no competing in two time points (baseline/5 months). Structural gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) neuro- financial interests. plasticity changes were assessed using language network region of interest-based voxel-based mor- Author contributions: A.J.S., A.P., phometry (VBM) and quantitative anisotropy-based connectometry, and their associations to improved S.-T.S., L.K., S.L., E.-R.S., S.M., G.S., language outcomes (Western Aphasia Battery Naming and Repetition) were evaluated. Connectometry V.S., and T.S. designed research; A.P., analyses showed that the singing group enhanced structural WM connectivity in the left arcuate S.-T.S., L.K., S.L., and E.-R.S. performed research; A.J.S., A.P., fasciculus (AF) and corpus callosum as well as in the frontal aslant tract (FAT), superior longitudinal S.-T.S., N.M.-M., J.P., and T.S. fasciculus, and corticostriatal tract bilaterally compared with the control group. Moreover, in VBM, analyzed data; A.J.S., S.-T.S., L.K., the singing group showed GM volume increase in the left inferior frontal cortex (Brodmann area 44) N.M.-M., S.L., E.-R.S., J.P., S.M., G.S., V.S., and T.S. wrote the paper. compared with the control group. The neuroplasticity effects in the left BA44, AF, and FAT correlated We thank Andrea Norton and Jeanette with improved naming abilities after the intervention. These findings suggest that in the poststroke Tamplin as well as all the PSA aphasia group, singing can bring about structural neuroplasticity changes in left frontal language areas participants and their family members and in bilateral language pathways, which underpin treatment-induced improvement in speech for their invaluable input in this project. This study was supported by the production. Academy of Finland (Grants 299044, 306625, 327996, and 346211), Key words: aphasia; music; rehabilitation; singing; stroke; structural connectivity Fundació La Marató de TV3 (Grant 201729.32), and European Research Council (Grant 803466). A.J.S received funding from the Finnish Cultural Significance Statement Foundation (Grant 191230), the Orion Research Foundation, and the Signe Understanding the neural underpinnings of improved language outcomes in aphasia is vital. We utilize and Ane Gyllenberg Foundation, and longitudinal neuroplasticity measures of both gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) and evaluate V.S. was supported by their contribution to group-based singing treatment effects in chronic aphasia. The results show Instrumentarium Science Foundation sr and Orion Research Foundation sr. that singing intervention induced GM and WM neuroplasticity changes in the left frontal Continued on next page. language-related structures, but also in the right hemisphere (WM), correlating with improved naming May 2024, 11(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0408-23.2024. 1 of 13  Research Article: New Research 2 of 13 abilities. These results shine light on treatment-induced structural changes in chronic aphasia and improve our understanding of aphasia rehabilitation. Introduction Poststroke aphasia (PSA) is a common and debilitating consequence of stroke, with 60% of the patients remaining aphasic even 1 year after the stroke (Pedersen et al., 2004). PSA incurs enormous socioeconomical burden to the society (Olesen et al., 2012) and is associated with greater extent of rehabilitation services required (Dickey et al., 2010). Due to these profound consequences, effective interventions of aphasia are of great necessity. The recovery of language functions after PSA is a complex process involving structural reorganization of the spared neurons within the language network according to the neural and neurocomputational models of PSA recovery (Stefaniak et al., 2020). Yet, research mapping treatment-induced structural changes supporting the reorganization processes that bring about beneficial behavioral change in PSA has remained scarce. Small-scale (N = 1–8) within-subject longitudinal studies of PSA have reported structural white matter (WM) changes in the left or right arcuate fasciculus (AF) or inferior longitudinal fasciculus following different types of speech therapy, such as constraint-induced language therapy or anomia treatment (Breier et al., 2011; Van Hees et al., 2014; McKinnon et al., 2017) or singing-based therapy, such as melodic intonation therapy (MIT; Schlaug et al., 2009), as well as in the left frontal regions and anterior corpus callosum following excitatory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (Allendorfer et al., 2012). To date, only a single aphasia study has reported structural changes in a randomized con- trolled trial (RCT), showing that self-managed spoken word comprehension therapy increased gray matter (GM) or WM density in the left and right temporal regions (Fleming et al., 2020). Taken together, our understanding of PSA treatment-induced structural changes that support the recovery of language function is far from comprehensive. Aphasia can often lead to depression and decreased social functioning, influencing patients’ engagement with the therapy and affecting the outcome (Hilari et al., 2012; Mitchell et al., 2017). Treating associated cognitive impairments and secondary effects of aphasia (depression and social isolation) should also improve communication and, ulti- mately, quality of life (Doogan et al., 2018). Yet, therapeutic interventions for PSA are implemented traditionally in individual setting, lacking social stimulation. Multifaceted group-based treatments focusing on both language and associated cognitive impair- ments as well as psychosocial effects of PSA should be of great value and ideal health economically due to limited rehabilitation resources (Doogan et al., 2018). Moreover, as the neuroplasticity changes supporting recovery after stroke can be enhanced by increas- ing stimulation from the environment (Nithianantharajah and Hannan, 2006; Baroncelli et al., 2010), especially when it involves also a social component (Johansson and Ohlsson, 1996; Venna et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2021), a combination of increased social, auditory, and cognitive stimulation could provide an avenue to tap into enhanced poststroke neuroplasticity supporting recovery of function in aphasia. In subacute stroke patients, mere daily vocal music listening (i.e., auditory stimulation) has been shown to improve poststroke language recovery in PSA, increasing the GM volume in the left temporal regions (Sihvonen et al., 2020), strengthening the functional connectivity of the language and default mode networks (Sihvonen et al., 2020, 2021a), and enhancing the structural connectivity of the left frontal aslant tract (FAT) and stimulus- *A.J.S. and A.P. contributed equally to this work. specific activation of its superior frontal termination areas compared with audiobook listening (Sihvonen et al., 2021b). Furthermore, MIT, a singing-based intervention for Correspondence should be addressed treating nonfluent aphasia, has been shown to improve connected speech, naming, and to Aleksi J. Sihvonen at aleksi.sihvonen@helsinki.fi. repetition (Sparks et al., 1974; Van Der Meulen et al., 2014; Zumbansen et al., 2014) and linking the positive effects to temporal and frontal speech motor areas, either in Copyright © 2024 Sihvonen et al. This is an open-access article the left (Belin et al., 1996; Breier et al., 2011) or right (Schlaug et al., 2008; Wan et al., distributed under the terms of the 2014; Tabei et al., 2016) hemisphere. In the healthy older adults, regular singing Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 has recently been linked to enhanced executive function (Pentikäinen et al., 2021; International license, which permits Vetere et al., 2024), frontotemporal auditory functioning (Pentikäinen et al., 2022), struc- unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided tural connectivity (Perron et al., 2021), and structural plasticity in auditory and that the original work is properly dorsal speech regions (Perron et al., 2022), suggesting that it may have neuroprotective attributed. effects in aging. May 2024, 11(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0408-23.2024. 2 of 13  Research Article: New Research 3 of 13 The abovementioned increased social, auditory, and stimulation effects could be further strengthened with group- based singing regimens, where, additionally, the spoken language network is stimulated via producing linguistic and musi- cal information via singing (Loui, 2015) that provide further neural stimulation supporting the recovering brain (Murphy and Corbett, 2009). In this vein, a recently published study has explored the behavioral effect of group-based singing interven- tion in treating patients with chronic aphasia (Siponkoski et al., 2022). Compared to standard care, singing improved responsive speech (Stockert et al., 2020) as indexed by Western Aphasia Battery (WAB) Naming and Repetition indices as well as enhanced long-term communication abilities and reduced family caregiver burden in questionnaires. However, the specific underlying neuroanatomical mediators of recovery of singing-based treatments for PSA are still unclear (Van Der Meulen et al., 2012). Here, we set out to determine the structural neuroplasticity benefits of group-based singing in an RCT of 28 patients with chronic PSA from Siponkoski et al. (2022). To do so, we evaluated the structural GM and WM neuroplasticity changes after a 4-month singing intervention using language network region of interest (ROI)-based GM analyses and structural connec- tometry (Yeh et al., 2016a) based on high-resolution T1 images and multishell diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) data. Previous studies on MIT (Schlaug et al., 2009; Wan et al., 2014) and vocal music interventions (Sihvonen et al., 2021a, b) have shown improved language outcomes in association with neuroplasticity changes in the bilateral frontal areas. Therefore, we hypothesized that the singing intervention induces neuroplasticity changes especially in the left and right frontal areas within the language network that would underpin the improved naming and repetition abilities. Materials and Methods Subjects and study design. Fifty-four participants with PSA were successfully recruited from the Helsinki region through patient organizations (Helsinki-Uusimaa Stroke Association and Finnish Brain Association) and clinical speech therapists to a registered RCT (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03501797). Data collection was performed in two waves, with 33 participants with PSA enrolled and randomized to the trial in Jan. 2018 and 21 participants with PSA in Jan. 2019. Data collection was completed in Dec. 2019. The inclusion criteria were (1) age over 18, (2) Finnish-speaking, (3) time since stroke >6 months, (4) at least mild nonfluent aphasia due to stroke assessed by the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination (BDAE) Aphasia Severity Rating Scale (score ≤4; Goodglass and Kaplan, 1983), (5) normal hearing, (6) no severe cognitive impairment affecting comprehension (e.g., memory disorder or perceptual deficit), (7) no neurological or psychiatric comorbidity or substance abuse, and (8) ability to produce vocal sounds through singing or humming. All participants were interviewed for eligibility by recruiting psychologists (authors A.P. and S-T.S.) and ensured that the patient was able to understand the purpose of the study. The study was conducted in conformance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Helsinki University Hospital Ethics Committee. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients and participating caregivers. Of the full sample (N = 54), 33 were eligible at the recruitment stage to undergo MRI and were randomly assigned to two groups stratified for aphasia severity (preliminary BDAE score), family caregiver’s participation in training sessions, sex, age, and time since stroke (Fig. 1). The randomization was performed using a random number generator by a researcher not involved in data collection. Outcome measurements including neuropsychological assessment and MRI scans were conducted at baseline (T1) and after the intervention period at the 5-month stage (T2). Additionally, the participants filled out a demographical, musical, and clinical background questionnaire at baseline and also reported at T2 the amount of other rehabilitation received between T1 and T2. In total, 28 patients completed the study from T1 to T2 (singing group N = 13, control group N = 15) and were included in the analyses (Fig. 1, Table 1). All patients received standard chronic stroke care and rehabilitation throughout the study. There were no significant differences between the groups in the amount of received therapy/rehabilitation (Table 1). Intervention. The duration of the intervention was 16 weeks, consisting of group training (once a week, 90 min/session, total 24 h) and self-training at home with a tablet computer software (target: three sessions/week, 30 min/session, total 24 h). Each group training session comprised group-based singing (60 min) and adapted group-level MIT (30 min) [see (Siponkoski et al., 2022) for details]. The sessions were arranged at the Aphasia Centre of the Helsinki-Uusimaa Stroke Association and were implemented by a music therapist and choir conductor team. Each patient had the opportunity to invite one caregiver or family member to participate in the sessions with them. Group-based singing included breathing and vocal exercises, vocal improvisation, and group singing with choral elements of 10 songs that were selected and arranged to be suitable for the patients. Group-level MIT comprised production of formulaic phrases utilizing the elements of MIT: intoning the phrases with simple melodic structure, tapping the rhythm with the left hand, and progressing hier- archically from unison production to repetition and from singing to spoken prosody (Schlaug et al., 2009). Home training sessions included self-training with a tablet computer, a headset, and an application developed together with Outloud, a Finnish software company. The application included all songs rehearsed in the training sessions and enabled progressive training with two different auditory models (vocal and instrumental melody) and two different visual aids (visual-kinetic model and visual-text model, that is, seeing the mouth movements of the singer and lyrics on the screen) that could be selected separately or in any combination. The software analyzed key acoustic features of the voice to provide immediate May 2024, 11(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0408-23.2024. 3 of 13  Research Article: New Research 4 of 13 Figure 1. Flowchart. feedback of the singing performance. The amount of home training was tracked with the app log files and was 10 h 24 min on average for the singing group (SD 6 h 51 min). Language assessment. The language assessment was conducted by trained psychologists for each patient at all time points, blinded to the group allocation of the participants. At baseline, WAB Aphasia Quotient (Kertesz, 2007), indi- cating the overall severity level of the aphasia, was calculated from the Spontaneous speech, Repetition, Naming, and Comprehension (estimated based on the Sequential commands subtest) indices. Here, based on the primary spoken language production outcome measure used in the study (Siponkoski et al., 2022), we focused a priori on naming and repetition (as indicated by WAB Naming and Repetition indices; Kertesz, 1982) as the primary aspects of test-assessed language functioning improved by singing intervention due to their strong neurobiological foundation (Geva et al., 2012; Hickok, 2012; Alyahya et al., 2020; Døli et al., 2021), providing commonly used and quantifiable measures of language function that can serve as feasible counterparts of structural brain changes in PSA, thereby also reducing dimensionality in analysis. Additionally, to control for possible group differences at baseline, we evaluated motor speech production (apraxia of speech) using the articulatory agility subtest of BDAE (Goodglass and Kaplan, 1983). MRI data acquisition and preprocessing. Patients were scanned on a 3T Siemens Skyra scanner at the Department of Radiology of the Helsinki University Hospital. For each patient, high-resolution T1-weighted anatomical images (TR = 1,800 ms; TE = 2.27 ms; TI = 900 ms; field of view = 250 × 250 mm; voxel size = 1 × 0.98 × 0.98 mm3) and multishell DW-MRI scan (TR = 5,000 ms, TE = 104 ms, field of view = 240 × 240 mm, voxel size = 2 × 2 × 2 mm3, directions = 142, b-max = 2,500 s/mm2) with 13 nondiffusion-weighted volume and 130 diffusion-weighted volumes (30 volumes with b = 1,000 s/mm2 and 100 volumes with b = 2,500 s/mm2) were acquired. May 2024, 11(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0408-23.2024. 4 of 13  Research Article: New Research 5 of 13 Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients All Singing group Control group N = 28 N = 13 N = 15 p-value Demographical Age (years) 64.7 (8.4) 64.1 (8.8) 65.2 (8.3) 0.731 (t) Sex (male/female) 14/14 7/6 7/8 0.705 (χ2) Handedness (right/left) 23/5 12/1 11/4 0.191 (χ2) Education levela 3.0 (1.3) 3.2 (1.4) 2.9 (1.3) 0.492 (U ) Music background Choir singing years 3.3 (9.3) 3.8 (12.4) 2.8 (6.0) 0.389 (U ) Singing lessons years 0.6 (3.5) 0.0 (0.0) 1.2 (4.6) 0.352 (U ) Instrument lessons years 0.8 (2.3) 0.2 (0.6) 1.3 (3.0) 0.325 (U ) Clinical Time from injury (months) 78.1 (82.0) 69.7 (77.9) 85.4 (87.3) 0.982 (U ) Lesion size (cm3) 89.3 (85.3) 119.0 (75.6) 63.5 (87.1) 0.023 (U ) Type of stroke (ischemic/hemorrhagic) 20/8 11/2 9/6 0.150 (χ2) AQ score (mild or moderate/severe)b 20/8 8/5 12/3 0.281 (χ2) BDAE verbal agility score 7.7 (4.8) 6.5 (5.2) 8.8 (4.2) 0.339 (U ) Received rehabilitation (T1–T2) Speech therapyc 7.3 (10.8) 7.6 (11.6) 6.9 (10.4) 0.717 (U ) Physical therapyc 6.9 (12.3) 8.5 (15.7) 5.5 (8.8) 1.000 (U ) Occupational therapyc 2.2 (5.7) 3.9 (8.0) 0.7 (1.5) 0.525 (U ) Neuropsychological rehabilitationc 0.3 (1.2) 0.0 (0.0) 0.6 (1.6) 0.555 (U ) Data are mean (SD) unless otherwise reported. Bold values denote statistical significance at p < 0.05. t, t test; χ2, chi-square test; U, Mann–Whitney U test; AQ, aphasia quotient; BDAE, Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination. a Education level according to the UNESCO International Standard Classification of Education: range 1 (primary education) to 6 (doctoral or equivalent level). b Aphasia severity based on the AQ score: 0–50 = severe, 51–100 = mild/moderate. c Data are mean (SD) in hours between T1 and T2. MRI data were preprocessed using the Statistical Parametric Mapping software (SPM12, Wellcome Department of Cognitive Neurology, UCL, www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/) under MATLAB 9.4.0. To achieve optimal normalization of MRI images containing stroke lesions, cost function masking (CFM) was applied (Brett et al., 2001). This exact approach has been widely used in stroke patients (Crinion et al., 2007; Ripollés et al., 2012; Sihvonen et al., 2020) and prevents postre- gistration lesion shrinkage and out-of-brain distortions. The CFMs were defined separately in each time point by creating precise binary masks of the lesions by manually delineating them to the individual T1 images slice-by-slice by authors A.J.S. and N.M-M. using the MRIcron software package (http://people.cas.sc.edu/rorden/mricron/index.htm). Lesion masks were verified by a neuroradiologist (Fig. 2). T1 images and lesion masks were then reoriented according to the ante- rior commissure and segmented using unified segmentation (Ashburner and Friston, 2005) with medium regularization and SPM12 IXI tissue probability maps. Individual lesion maps were used to apply CFM during the preprocessing. Due to large lesion sizes, damaged voxels were masked out to achieve accurate segmentation and spatial normalization. The seg- mented GM probability maps were then modulated, resampled to 2 × 2 × 2 mm3 voxel size, and normalized to Montreal Neurological Institution (MNI) space, together with the binarized lesion maps. Residual interindividual variability was reduced by smoothing the GM probability maps using an isotropic spatial filter (FWHM = 6 mm). Lastly, the segmented GM probability maps were visually inspected for segmentation errors and distortions to ensure optimal segmentation. DW-MRI data preprocessing and reconstruction. First, the DW-MRI data were denoised for thermal noise with the MP-PCA method (Veraart et al., 2016) using a denoise tool from MRTrix3 (https://www.mrtrix.org/; Tournier et al., 2019) and corrected for Gibbs ringing based on local subvoxel shifts (Kellner et al., 2016). The b-table was checked by an auto- matic quality control routine to ensure its accuracy (Schilling et al., 2019). The DW-MRI data were reconstructed in the MNI space using DSI Studio (http://dsi-studio.labsolver.org, version April 7, 2021) and q-space diffeomorphic reconstruction (Yeh and Tseng, 2011) that allows the construction of spin distribution functions (Yeh et al., 2010). Normalization to the MNI space provides a direct way to analyze, for example, group differences. Normalization was carried out using the anisotropy map of each participant, and a diffusion sampling length ratio of 1.25 was used. The data output was resampled to 2 mm isotropic resolution. The quality of the normalization was inspected using the R2 values denoting goodness of fit (R2 > 0.6) between the participant’s anisotropy map and template. Furthermore, each participant’s forceps major and minor were inspected and used as an anatomical benchmark to confirm the normalization quality (Hula et al., 2020). The restricted diffusion was quantified using restricted diffusion imaging (Yeh et al., 2017) and quantitative anisotropy (QA) was extracted as the local connectome fingerprint (Yeh et al., 2016b) and used in the connectometry analysis. QA has been shown to outperform traditional fractional anisotropy (FA) by being more specific to individual’s connectivity patterns (Yeh et al., 2016b) and less susceptible to the partial volume effect of crossing fibers and free water as well as to provide better resolution in tractography (Yeh et al., 2013). May 2024, 11(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0408-23.2024. 5 of 13  Research Article: New Research 6 of 13 Figure 2. Lesion overlap map of all patients (N = 28). The n-value represents the number of patients with a lesion to a specific voxel. Regions of interest. As we expected the intervention to induce treatment-related and activity-dependent neuroplasticity effects in brain regions activated by the singing intervention (Murphy and Corbett, 2009), we focused the analyses on neu- ral structures related to both singing and aphasia recovery. To do this, a probabilistic human brain atlas, Brainnetome atlas (https://atlas.brainnetome.org/; Fan et al., 2016), explicitly accommodating intersubject variability in anatomy, was used to define the ROIs. Four regions from each hemisphere were derived from the Brainnetome atlas: Brodmann area (BA) 44, BA45, ventral premotor cortex (vPMC), and posterior middle temporal gyrus (pMTG). All of these areas have been impli- cated in singing [BA44/45 (Kleber et al., 2013; Zarate, 2013; Marchina et al., 2023), vPMC (Callan et al., 2006; Kleber et al., 2013; Marchina et al., 2023), pMTG (Whitehead and Armony, 2018; Marchina et al., 2023)] or in supporting recovery in PSA [BA44/45 (Crinion and Price, 2005; Turkeltaub et al., 2011; Hartwigsen and Saur, 2019; Stefaniak et al., 2021), vPMC (Saur et al., 2006; Seghier et al., 2014a), pMTG (Crinion and Price, 2005; Griffis et al., 2017)]. BA44 and BA45 (together known as Broca’s area) were investigated separately given their established differentiation in function (Gough et al., 2005) and con- nectivity (Anwander et al., 2007). Connectometry analysis. Connectometry (Yeh et al., 2016a) analyses were carried out using DSI Studio (http://dsi-studio. labsolver.org, version April 7, 2021). Connectometry is a reasonably new statistical method that includes mapping and anal- ysis of local connectomes, that is, the degree of connectivity between adjacent voxels within a WM tract defined by the den- sity of the diffusing spins. As a result, connectometry identifies the segments of WM fiber bundles that exhibit significant association with the study variable, here group over time. Unlike traditional FA-based structural connectome analyses, which identify differences in the mean values for the whole WM tract or using voxel-based FA values, connectometry uses QA, a measure based on the diffusion orientation distribution function (ODF), to track only the segment of the fiber bun- dle that exhibits significant association with the study variable or group difference. To do this, DW-MRI data are recon- structed into a standard template space (MNI) onto a local connectome matrix from the studied sample. Study-relevant variables or group information are then associated with this local connectome matrix to identify local connectomes express- ing significant associations with the variable of interest. Using diffusion ODF-based measure (QA) for resolving multiple fibers, these local connectomes are then tracked along the core pathway of a fiber bundle using a fiber tracking algorithm within the Human Connectome Project tractography atlas (HCP-1065) based on 1,065 subjects and compared with a null distribution of coherent associations using permutation statistics. In summary, connectometry analyzes significant QA associations with a variable of interest or QA differences between two groups along the pathways themselves as compared with mean FA in a voxel or representing a whole tract. The analysis then outputs the significant segments of the connectome and tracts that were significantly associated between the group difference and the study variable. As the DW-MRI data are reconstructed into standard space and tracking is based on template, it also minimizes bias and variability induced by man- ual tracking in which, for example, slightly increasing the size of ROIs used to dissect tracts drastically changes the resulting number of streamlines and the volume they occupy, inducing significant variability within protocols and across subjects (Rheault et al., 2020; Schilling et al., 2021). The minimum length is set by voxel threshold (here 20 voxels). A statistical model utilizing nonparametric Spearman rank-based correlation was built to consider the nonlinear effect of the group (singing group vs control group, control group vs singing group) and the longitudinal change of QA. In other words, the model compared the longitudinal (T2 > T1) significant QA changes across the structural connectome between the groups to evaluate possible treatment-related neuroplasticity changes and whether they were larger in the singing group or in the control group. Due to the group difference observed in lesion size, it was included as a nuisance variable in the analyses (Table 1). The eight selected ROIs were used as seeding regions. Local connectomes with T-score exceed- ing 2 were selected (Hula et al., 2020) and tracked using a deterministic fiber tracking algorithm (Yeh et al., 2013) to obtain correlational tractography. The tracks were filtered by topology-informed pruning (Yeh et al., 2019) with four iterations, and a length threshold of 20-voxel distance was used to identify significant tracts. Bootstrap resampling with 10,000 random- ized permutations was used to obtain the null distribution of the track length and estimate the false discovery rates (FDRs). The alpha level was set to pFDR < 0.05. May 2024, 11(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0408-23.2024. 6 of 13  Research Article: New Research 7 of 13 GM neuroplasticity analysis. The GM volume in each of the eight ROIs in two time points (T1 and T2) was extracted for all participants using SPM12 and exported to SPSS (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, v.27.0.: IBM, https://www.ibm.com/ products/spss-statistics). A multivariate ANOVA across groups (the independent variable), including age, sex, education, total intracranial volume, and lesion size as nuisance variables (Barnes et al., 2010; Table 1), was calculated for the GM volume change (the dependent variable) in T2 > T1 (treatment-related neuroplasticity changes vs control). The total intra- cranial volume and lesion size did not correlate significantly (r = 0.163; p = 0.407). FDR correction was applied to control for multiple comparisons (N = 8), and the alpha level was set to pFDR < 0.05. Additional voxel-based morphometry (VBM) analysis was performed using SPM12 (Wellcome Department of Cognitive Neurology, UCL, www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/) under MATLAB 9.4.0 to evaluate the voxel-wise GM changes in association with the intervention. To assess the longitudinal differences in GM volume changes over time between the singing group and the control group, GM difference images were first calculated with ImCalc by subtracting each patient’s GM probability map at baseline from the 5-month follow-up GM probability map. Then, the longitudinal individual preprocessed GM images were submitted to second-level independent sample t test analyses with group (sing- ing group and control group) as factor and age, sex, education, time from stroke, total intracranial volume, and lesion size as nuisance variables. Three different t tests were calculated: (1) an unrestricted whole-brain analysis, (2) a voxel-wise analysis focused within the language network based on meta-analysis (https://neurosynth.org/analyses/terms/ language/), and (3) a voxel-wise analysis focused within the study-specific ROIs. All results were thresholded at an uncor- rected p < 0.005 threshold at the voxel level, and standard SPM family-wise error rate (FWE) cluster-level correction based on random field theory with a pFWE < 0.05 was used. Only clusters surviving FWE-corrected p < 0.05 at the cluster level are reported. Data availability. Anonymized data reported in this manuscript are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request and subject to approval by the appropriate regulatory committees and officials. We have reported how we determined our sample size, all data exclusions (if any), all inclusion/exclusion criteria, whether inclusion/exclusion criteria were established prior to data analysis, all manipulations, and all measures in the study. Results First, by using two separate univariate ANOVAs, we confirmed that the singing and control groups did not differ in base- line WAB Naming (pFDR = 0.585) and WAB Repetition (pFDR = 0.585) scores (Table 2). Then, using two separate univariate ANOVAs, we evaluated whether the singing intervention was associated with language function improvements in the cur- rent sample patients with chronic PSA from the original trial (Siponkoski et al., 2022). Due to the group difference (Table 1), the analysis was adjusted for lesion size. The ANOVAs showed that the singing group significantly improved in WAB Naming [F(1,25) = 10.98; pFDR = 0.006; η2p = 0.305] but not in WAB Repetition [F(1,25) = 1.24; pFDR = 0.277; η2p = 0.047] com- pared with the control group between T1 and T2 (ΔT2–T1). Intervention-induced WM neuroplasticity changes First, using a nonparametric Spearman correlational model, we confirmed that the singing and control groups did not differ in baseline QA in any WM tract (pFDR = 0.140–1.000). Compared to the control group, the singing group showed greater increase in QA in the left AF (pFDR = 0.005), FAT (pFDR = 0.004), superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF: pFDR = 0.005), and corticostriatal tract (pFDR = 0.004), and in the right FAT (pFDR = 0.004), SLF (pFDR = 0.004) and corticostriatal tract (pFDR = 0.004) as well as in the the corpus callo- sum (pFDR = 0.005) in ΔT2–T1 (Fig. 3). Intervention-induced GM neuroplasticity changes First, using separate univariate ANOVAs, we confirmed that the singing and control groups did not differ in baseline GM volume in any of the chosen ROIs (pFDR = 0.822–0.867). In the multivariate ANOVA evaluating treatment-related GM changes (ΔT2–T1), there was a statistically significant differ- ence in the longitudinal change in the GM volume between the groups [F(8,19) = 3.759; p = 0.020; Wilk’s Λ = 0.285; η2p = 0.715]. Therefore, eight separate univariate ANOVAs (i.e., one for each ROI) were performed. These revealed that the GM volume change (ΔT2–T1) of the left BA44 [F(1,19) = 20.785, pFDR = 0.008; η2p = 0.522; singing groupmean = 61 mm3, control groupmean = −140 mm3], left BA45 [F(1,19) = 9.772, pFDR = 0.024; η2p = 0.340; singing groupmean = 28 mm3, control groupmean = −73 mm3], and left vPMC[F(1,19) = 8.607, pFDR = 0.024; η2p = 0.312; singing groupmean = 57 mm3, control groupmean = −195 mm3] showed greater increase in the singing group than in the control group (A > B; Fig. 4). ANOVAs for the other ROIs were not significant after FDR correction. In addition to the a priori defined ROI-based analysis, longitudinal treatment-related GM volume changes were also assessed using three different voxel-wise analyses: (1) an unrestricted whole-brain analysis, (2) a voxel-wise analysis focused within the language network based on meta-analysis (https://neurosynth.org/analyses/terms/language/), and (3) a voxel-wise analysis focused within the study-specific ROIs. Similar to the ROI-based analysis, age, sex, education, total intracranial volume, and lesion size were added as nuisance variables. In all three longitudinal VBM analyses, the GM May 2024, 11(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0408-23.2024. 7 of 13  Research Article: New Research 8 of 13 Table 2. Spoken language and neuroplasticity analysis outcomes Measure Group T1 mean (SD) T2 mean (SD) ΔT2 > T1 mean (SD) Baseline diff. (pFDR-value) ΔT2 > T1 (pFDR-value) Spoken language outcomes WAB Naming Singing 5.0 (3.6) 5.7 (3.8) 0.7 (0.7) 0.585 0.006 Control 7.4 (3.6) 7.4 (3.5) 0.0 (0.5) WAB Repetition Singing 5.4 (3.6) 5.7 (3.4) 0.3 (0.7) 0.585 0.277 Control 7.6 (3.4) 7.6 (3.3) 0.0 (0.4) Neuroplasticity outcomes GMV left BA44a Singing 747 (568) 807 (586) 61 (108) 0.945 0.008 Control 854 (387) 713 (427) −140 (141) GMV right BA44a Singing 1,619 (159) 1,628 (278) 9 (99) 0.718 0.587 Control 1,798 (336) 1,743 (324) −55 (149) GMV left BA45a Singing 387 (304) 414 (306) 28 (43) 0.945 0.024 Control 409 (240) 336 (263) −73 (78) GMV right BA45a Singing 873 (159) 891 (173) 19 (61) 0.720 0.759 Control 924 (201) 913 (164) −11 (110) GMV left vPMCa Singing 884 (567) 941 (607) 57 (203) 0.718 0.024 Control 1,106 (400) 913 (460) −195 (151) GMV right vPMCa Singing 1,783 (293) 1,775 (309) −8 (105) 0.833 0.876 Control 1,827 (448) 1,810 (370) −21 (172) GMV left pMTGa Singing 1,103 (718) 1,090 (724) −13 (76) 0.718 0.268 Control 1,383 (430) 1,431 (591) 47 (56) GMV right pMTGa Singing 2,205 (533) 2,242 (551) 37 (137) 0.718 0.777 Control 2,498 (503) 2,513 (477) 14 (74) WM left AFb Singing 0.10 (0.04) 0.11 (0.05) 0.01 (0.01) 0.480 0.005 Control 0.11 (0.04) 0.11 (0.05) 0.00 (0.02) WM left FATb Singing 0.13 (0.03) 0.14 (0.04) 0.01 (0.02) 0.523 0.004 Control 0.14 (0.05) 0.13 (0.06) −0.01 (0.02) WM right FATb Singing 0.19 (0.03) 0.20 (0.03) 0.01 (0.01) 0.815 0.004 Control 0.20 (0.03) 0.19 (0.02) 0.00 (0.02) WM left SLFb Singing 0.10 (0.05) 0.11 (0.05) 0.01 (0.01) 0.480 0.005 Control 0.11 (0.04) 0.11 (0.05) 0.00 (0.02) WM right SLFb Singing 0.21 (0.03) 0.22 (0.03) 0.01 (0.01) 0.480 0.004 Control 0.20 (0.03) 0.20 (0.03) 0.00 (0.01) WM left CSb Singing 0.09 (0.04) 0.10 (0.04) 0.01 (0.01) 0.480 0.004 Control 0.10 (0.04) 0.10 (0.05) 0.00 (0.01) WM right CSb Singing 0.16 (0.04) 0.17 (0.04) 0.01 (0.01) 0.555 0.004 Control 0.17 (0.03) 0.17 (0.02) 0.00 (0.01) WM CCb Singing 0.14 (0.03) 0.15 (0.03) 0.01 (0.01) 0.480 0.005 Control 0.15 (0.03) 0.15 (0.03) −0.01 (0.01) Data are mean (SD) unless otherwise reported. Bold values denote statistical significance at p < 0.05. P-values are FDR corrected. a Volume in mm3. b Normalized QA. volume increased more in the singing group than in the control group in one cluster comprising the left BA44 and vPMC (peak MNI coordinate = −56, 16, 18; Extended Data Figure 4-1). Both within language network (cluster size = 512 voxels, T-value = 6.43, pFWE = 0.038) and within study-specific ROIs (cluster size = 167 voxels, T-value = 6.45, pFWE = 0.041) anal- yses were statistically significant, but the GM volume change failed to reach statistical significance in the unrestricted whole-brain analysis (cluster size = 366 voxels; T-value = 5.96; pFWE = 0.263). Brain–behavior relationships To investigate treatment-induced brain–behavior relationships, we first evaluated the longitudinal QA change associa- tions with improved naming, as the functional restoration in PSA mostly relies upon the structural remodeling of the injured networks (Stefaniak et al., 2020). Therefore, a nonparametric Spearman correlational model (T2 > T1) was built to derive the correlational tractography within the significant WM findings evaluating the longitudinal change of QA correlated with the improvement in WAB Naming. In ΔT2 > T1, increased QA in the left FAT (pFDR = 0.009) and AF (pFDR = 0.016) correlated with improved naming (Fig. 3). Evaluation of the relationship between improved naming scores and GM volume changes were restricted to the left BA44 to which both left AF and FAT are frontally terminated (Thiebaut de Schotten et al., 2012). Partial correlation (Pearson’s, one-tailed, controlling for the same nuisance variables as in the initial GM volume analysis, i.e., age, sex, edu- cation, total intracranial volume, and lesion size) using SPSS showed that increased GM volume (ΔT2–T1) in the left BA44 correlated with improved naming abilities (r = 0.371; p = 0.044; Fig. 4). May 2024, 11(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0408-23.2024. 8 of 13  Research Article: New Research 9 of 13 Figure 3. Treatment-induced WM neuroplasticity changes. Connectometry results displaying the significant segments of the tracts with longitudinal QA increases significantly associated with singing group versus control group between T1 and T2 (ΔT2–T1; left) and longitudinal QA change correlation with improved naming (right). FDR, false discovery rate; L, left; QA, quantitative anisotropy; R, right. Figure 4. Treatment-induced GM neuroplasticity changes. Longitudinal GM volume increases (singing group > control group) in T2 > T1 and longitudinal GM volume change correlation with improved naming. Additional exploratory voxel-wise analyses are reported in Extended Data Figure 4-1. Bar plots for mean group GM volume changes are shown: bar, mean; error bar, standard error of mean. BA, Brodmann area; FDR, false discovery rate; vPMC, ventral premotor cortex. Discussion This study set out to determine the structural GM and WM benefits of group-based singing in PSA rehabilitation and their correlation to improved language outcome. Our novel main findings were that group-based singing enhanced structural WM connectivity in both the left and right hemispheres within the language network and the GM volume in the left language-related frontal areas compared with the control group. The left frontal neuroplasticity effects correlated with improved naming abilities. The present study provides the first evidence on the neural benefits of group-based singing May 2024, 11(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0408-23.2024. 9 of 13  Research Article: New Research 10 of 13 that supports language recovery in PSA and extends previous results on the effects of music-based interventions in stroke rehabilitation, including MIT (Schlaug et al., 2009; Marchina et al., 2023) and music listening (Sihvonen et al., 2017a, 2020, 2021b). These results are important in (1) providing evidence of treatment-induced structural changes in chronic PSA, (2) improving our understanding of chronic PSA rehabilitation, and (3) determining targets and mediators of music-based rehabilitation strategies (Sihvonen et al., 2017a). In aphasia, recovery relies on the ability of the spared neurons to remodel the injured network (Kiran et al., 2019). The recovery processes in PSA exploit activity-dependent neuroplasticity mechanisms (Murphy and Corbett, 2009) within the language network (Stefaniak et al., 2020, 2021), that is, increased stimulation through iterative utilization of language pro- cesses, and therefore activating the language network supports the recovering brain by increasing, for example, dendritic spine density and neurotrophic factor levels (Carmichael et al., 2001; Nithianantharajah and Hannan, 2006). In the context of neural stimulation, music-based interventions, such as singing, are feasible tools to promote language network recov- ery in PSA (Särkämö and Sihvonen, 2018). First, simply listening to vocal music has been demonstrated to activate language-related regions of the brain, even in the case of acute stroke (Sihvonen et al., 2017b). Moreover, daily listening to vocal music poststroke has been linked to improved language recovery in PSA, evidenced by improved language skills and verbal memory and increased GM volume within the left temporal regions (Sihvonen et al., 2020). The vocal music listening intervention also enhances the functional connectivity within the language and default mode networks (Sihvonen et al., 2020, 2021a), and strengthens the structural connectivity of the left FAT and stimulus-specific activation of its superior frontal termination areas compared with audiobook listening (Sihvonen et al., 2021b). Compared to mere vocal music listening, choir singing should be superior in administering neural stimulation and providing more fertile envi- ronment for recovery as it incorporates multiple elements such as the production of words through singing, physiological effects of singing, the experience of singing with others, the perception of sung music, social interaction, and the learning of new songs and lyrics. In theory, these combined factors create a more conducive environment for neural stimulation and recovery (Murphy and Corbett, 2009). Second, singing and speech share core neuronal circuitry within the left hemisphere (Pitkäniemi et al., 2023). Singing also binds linguistic and musical information into a unified representation and naturally increases connectedness between syllables and words and, in this respect, resembles connected spoken language production. Compared to speaking, sing- ing engages bilateral language-related frontotemporal areas more extensively (Callan et al., 2006; Schön et al., 2010) and requires multiple neural circuits to operate in concert (Loui, 2015). The classical notion in neurology is that even patients with severe PSA can retain the ability to sing lyrics of familiar songs (Johnson and Graziano, 2015). Sung information is also accessible to patients with PSA who have been shown to repeat and recall more words when singing than when speaking (Racette et al., 2006; Leo et al., 2018). This evidence suggests that singing can provide an avenue for language rehabil- itation in PSA. Indeed, singing-based interventions such as MIT have been shown to improve language recovery in non- fluent PSA (Sparks et al., 1974; Van Der Meulen et al., 2014; Zumbansen et al., 2014) with associated positive neuroplasticity effects reported in language-related frontotemporal areas bilaterally (Belin et al., 1996; Schlaug et al., 2008; Breier et al., 2011; Wan et al., 2014; Tabei et al., 2016). In accordance with the abovementioned, our current findings revealed that group-based singing enhanced WM connec- tivity in both hemispheres, but with left-hemispheric dominance. Treatment-related changes correlating with improved naming abilities comprised the left AF and FAT, damage of which has been associated with speech production outcome in PSA (Fridriksson et al., 2013; Alyahya et al., 2020). Changes were also observed in the corpus callosum, SLF, and cor- ticostriatal tract bilaterally. These observations might lend to two distinct mechanisms, that is, treatment-related changes within the language network and in the shared structures between the language and domain-general networks. According to the neurocomputational model of PSA recovery, initially damaged AF/SLF undergoes plasticity-related changes during the recovery (Stefaniak et al., 2020). The corpus callosum has been shown to play a critical role in language comprehen- sion in integrating prosodic and syntactic information (Sammler et al., 2010), and its treatment-related changes after singing-based treatments, combining melody, rhythm, and linguistic information, are reasonable findings. In contrast, treatment-related plasticity changes in the corticostriatal tracts might reflect more domain-general network effects as cor- ticostriatal systems have been shown to play a domain-general regulatory role in language operations (Copland et al., 2021). Moreover, the proposed neuroanatomical model supporting singing center on the left AF/SLF but also includes the left FAT as well as ventral tracts (Loui, 2015). The present findings conform with this model and the previous neuro- anatomical evidence on the core neuronal circuitry underpinning singing of words in aphasia (Pitkäniemi et al., 2023) as well as with the previous small-scale PSA treatment-induced WM findings (Schlaug et al., 2009; Breier et al., 2011; Allendorfer et al., 2012; Van Hees et al., 2014). Group-based singing-induced GM plasticity changes that correlated with improved naming abilities were observed in the left BA44 where the left AF/SLF and FAT cortically terminate (Thiebaut de Schotten et al., 2012). The intervention group showed longitudinally slightly increased GM volume in the left BA44, whereas the control group showed a decline in that area. This most likely owes to the accelerated brain atrophy rate after stroke, which is 2–4 times greater than in healthy controls (Brodtmann et al., 2020, 2021; Salah Khlif et al., 2022). Lesioned areas have been shown to lead to further neuronal decay, even in the chronic poststroke stage, with a median rate of 1,590 mm3 per year (Seghier et al., 2014b). In comparison, the mean left BA44 GM volume decrease in the control group in the present study was 140 mm3 in 5 months. Similarly, WM neurodegeneration in ipsi- and contralesional tracts continues to be greater in May 2024, 11(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0408-23.2024. 10 of 13  Research Article: New Research 11 of 13 stroke survivors compared with the healthy population (Egorova-Brumley et al., 2023). In a recent study on patients with PSA, most patients showed evidence of lesion expansion and that it was associated with further declining language per- formance (Johnson et al., 2023). The poststroke brain atrophy rates may serve as biomarkers reflecting treatment response for interventions to reduce poststroke secondary degeneration and vascular cognitive impairment (Brodtmann et al., 2021). For these reasons, interventions, including singing-based ones, might not only increase GM vol- ume but also prevent further brain atrophy in PSA. However, future longitudinal studies with larger sample sizes are needed to elucidate whether the improved functional outcomes are underpinned by possible neuroprotective neuroplas- ticity changes that prevent GM atrophy and WM neurodegeneration poststroke, if not increase GM volumes and WM structural connectivity. The observed relationship between the treatment-induced improvement of naming and neuroplasticity in the left frontal GM and WM is well in line with the classic models of word production (Indefrey and Levelt, 2004; Hickok, 2012) in which the speech motor processes of syllabification, phonetic encoding, and articulation are attributed to largely to these regions and pathways. The singing intervention may support this process by slowing the rate of word production and increasing the connectedness between syllables/words through continuous voicing and melodic intonation (Wan et al., 2010). Moreover, treatment-related modulation of the left-hemispheric cortical activity in Broca’s area and the premotor cortex has been associated with improved naming in PSA (Fridriksson, 2010). The present study has some potential limitations. First, the singing intervention comprised multiple components, and differentiating between the efficacies of individual treatment components is not possible based on the current data. Second, the sample size is relatively small and lacked an active control matched for dose of the intervention, limiting the generalizability of the findings. The sample size also affected the sensitivity of the additional voxel-wise analyses, where both focused analyses provided statistically significant results paralleling the a priori ROI-based analysis, but the unrestricted whole-brain analysis did not. Yet, the results from all the three voxel-wise analyses were similar and con- formed with the ROI analysis. However, the beneficial effects of singing-based interventions might not be restricted to the left frontal regions, and future studies with larger sample sizes utilizing whole-brain analyses are warranted. Yet, this study is the largest multimodal RCT to date on treatment-induced neuroplasticity changes in PSA. While the present results need to be replicated in future larger studies, they are encouraging in providing us evidence of health economically prom- ising multifaceted PSA treatment bringing about beneficial neuroplasticity change. In conclusion, the present results suggest that the positive effects of singing on chronic PSA recovery are underpinned by structural GM and WM reorganization, mainly within the left frontal areas. Clinically, together with previous behavioral results on positive effects of singing in chronic PSA (Siponkoski et al., 2022), this evidence suggests that group-based singing is a feasible tool to promote language network reorganization and recovery in PSA. References Allendorfer JB, Storrs JM, Szaflarski JP (2012) Changes in white matter Brodtmann A, et al. (2021) Neurodegeneration over 3 years following integrity follow excitatory rTMS treatment of post-stroke aphasia. ischaemic stroke: findings from the cognition and neocortical vol- Restor Neurol Neurosci 30:103–113. ume after stroke study. Front Neurol 12:754204. Alyahya RSW, Halai AD, Conroy P, Lambon MA (2020) A unified model Brodtmann A, Khlif MS, Egorova N, Veldsman M, Bird LJ, Werden E of post-stroke language deficits including discourse production (2020) Dynamic regional brain atrophy rates in the first year after and their neural correlates. Brain 143:1541–1554. ischemic stroke. Stroke 51:183–192. Anwander A, Tittgemeyer M, Von Cramon DY, Friederici AD, Knösche Callan DE, Tsytsarev V, Hanakawa T, Callan AM, Katsuhara M, Fukuyama TR (2007) Connectivity-based parcellation of Broca’s area. Cereb H, Turner R (2006) Song and speech: brain regions involved with per- Cortex 17:816–825. ception and covert production. Neuroimage 31:1327–1342. Ashburner J, Friston KJ (2005) Unified segmentation. Neuroimage Carmichael ST, Wei L, Rovainen CM, Woolsey TA (2001) New patterns 26:839–851. of intracortical projections after focal cortical stroke. Neurobiol Dis Barnes J, Ridgway GR, Bartlett J, Henley SMD, Lehmann M, Hobbs N, 8:910–922. Clarkson MJ, MacManus DG, Ourselin S, Fox NC (2010) Head size, Copland DA, Brownsett S, Iyer K, Angwin AJ (2021) Corticostriatal reg- age and gender adjustment in MRI studies: a necessary nuisance? ulation of language functions. Neuropsychol Rev 31:472–494. Neuroimage 53:1244–1255. Crinion J, Price CJ (2005) Right anterior superior temporal activation Baroncelli L, Braschi C, Spolidoro M, Begenisic T, Sale A, Maffei L predicts auditory sentence comprehension following aphasic (2010) Nurturing brain plasticity: impact of environmental enrich- stroke. Brain 128:2858–2871. ment. Cell Death Differ 17:1092–1103. Crinion J, Ashburner J, Leff A, Brett M, Price C, Friston K (2007) Spatial Belin P, Van Eeckhout P, Zilbovicius M, Remy P, François C, Guillaume normalization of lesioned brains: performance evaluation and S, Chain F, Rancurel G, Samson Y (1996) Recovery from nonfluent impact on fMRI analyses. Neuroimage 37:866–875. aphasia after melodic intonation therapy: a PET study. Neurology Dickey L, Kagan A, Lindsay MP, Fang J, Rowland A, Black S (2010) 47:1504–1511. Incidence and profile of inpatient stroke-induced aphasia in Breier JI, Juranek J, Papanicolaou AC (2011) Changes in maps of lan- Ontario, Canada. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 91:196–202. guage function and the integrity of the arcuate fasciculus after ther- Døli H, Andersen Helland W, Helland T, Specht K (2021) Associations apy for chronic aphasia. Neurocase 17:506–517. between lesion size, lesion location and aphasia in acute stroke. Brett M, Leff AP, Rorden C, Ashburner J (2001) Spatial normalization of Aphasiology 35:745–763. brain images with focal lesions using cost function masking. Doogan C, Dignam J, Copland D, Leff A (2018) Aphasia recovery: Neuroimage 14:486–500. when, how and who to treat? Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 18:90. May 2024, 11(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0408-23.2024. 11 of 13  Research Article: New Research 12 of 13 Egorova-Brumley N, Dhollander T, Khan W, Khlif MS, Ebaid D, Marchina S, Norton A, Schlaug G (2023) Effects of melodic intonation Brodtmann A (2023) Changes in white matter microstructure therapy in patients with chronic nonfluent aphasia. Ann N Y Acad over 3 years in people with and without stroke. Neurology 100: Sci 1519:173–185. E1664–E1672. McKinnon ET, Fridriksson J, Glenn GR, Jensen JH, Helpern JA, Fan L, et al. (2016) The human Brainnetome atlas: a new brain Basilakos A, Rorden C, Shih AY, Spampinato MV, Bonilha L atlas based on connectional architecture. Cereb Cortex 26:3508– (2017) Structural plasticity of the ventral stream and aphasia recov- 3526. ery. Ann Neurol 82:147–151. Fleming V, et al. (2020) Efficacy of spoken word comprehension Mitchell AJ, Sheth B, Gill J, Yadegarfar M, Stubbs B, Yadegarfar M, therapy in patients with chronic aphasia: a cross-over randomised Meader N (2017) Prevalence and predictors of post-stroke controlled trial with structural imaging. J Neurol Neurosurg mood disorders: a meta-analysis and meta-regression of depres- Psychiatry 92:418–424. sion, anxiety and adjustment disorder. Gen Hosp Psychiatry Fridriksson J (2010) Preservation and modulation of specific left hemi- 47:48–60. sphere regions is vital for treated recovery from anomia in stroke. Murphy TH, Corbett D (2009) Plasticity during stroke recovery: from J Neurosci 30:11558–11564. synapse to behaviour. Nat Rev Neurosci 10:861–872. Fridriksson J, Guo D, Fillmore P, Holland A, Rorden C (2013) Damage Nithianantharajah J, Hannan AJ (2006) Enriched environments, to the anterior arcuate fasciculus predicts non-fluent speech pro- experience-dependent plasticity and disorders of the nervous sys- duction in aphasia. Brain 136:3451–3460. tem. Nat Rev Neurosci 7:697–709. Geva S, Baron JC, Jones PS, Price CJ, Warburton EA (2012) A com- Olesen J, Gustavsson A, Svensson M, Wittchen HU, Jönsson B (2012) parison of VLSM and VBM in a cohort of patients with post-stroke The economic cost of brain disorders in Europe. Eur J Neurol aphasia. NeuroImage Clin 1:37–47. 19:155–162. Goodglass H, Kaplan E (1983) Boston diagnostic aphasia examination Pedersen PM, Vinter K, Olsen TS (2004) Aphasia after stroke: type, (BDAE), Ed 2. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Lea & Febiger. severity and prognosis: the Copenhagen aphasia study. Gough PM, Nobre AC, Devlin JT (2005) Dissociating linguistic pro- Cerebrovasc Dis 17:35–43. cesses in the left inferior frontal cortex with transcranial magnetic Pentikäinen E, Kimppa L, Makkonen T, Putkonen M, Pitkäniemi A, stimulation. J Neurosci 25:8010–8016. Salakka I, Paavilainen P, Tervaniemi M, Särkämö T (2022) Griffis JC, Nenert R, Allendorfer JB, Vannest J, Holland S, Dietz A, Benefits of choir singing on complex auditory encoding in the aging Szaflarski JP (2017) The canonical semantic network supports brain: an ERP study. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1514:82–92. residual language function in chronic post-stroke aphasia. Hum Pentikäinen E, Pitkäniemi A, Siponkoski ST, Jansson M, Louhivuori J, Brain Mapp 38:1636–1658. Johnson JK, Paajanen T, Särkämö T (2021) Beneficial effects of Hartwigsen G, Saur D (2019) Neuroimaging of stroke recovery from choir singing on cognition and well-being of older adults: evidence aphasia – insights into plasticity of the human language network. from a cross-sectional study. PLoS One 16:e0245666. Neuroimage 190:14–31. Perron M, Theaud G, Descoteaux M, Tremblay P (2021) The frontotem- Hickok G (2012) Computational neuroanatomy of speech production. poral organization of the arcuate fasciculus and its relationship with Nat Rev Neurosci 13:135–145. speech perception in young and older amateur singers and non- Hilari K, Needle JJ, Harrison KL (2012) What are the important factors singers. Hum Brain Mapp 42:3058–3076. in health-related quality of life for people with aphasia? A systema- Perron M, Vaillancourt J, Tremblay P (2022) Amateur singing benefits tic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 93:S86–S95. speech perception in aging under certain conditions of practice: Hula WD, Panesar S, Gravier ML, Yeh FC, Dresang HC, Dickey MW, behavioural and neurobiological mechanisms. Brain Struct Funct Fernandez-Miranda JC (2020) Structural white matter connecto- 227:943–962. metry of word production in aphasia: an observational study. Pitkäniemi A, Särkämö T, Siponkoski S-T, Brownsett SLE, Copland Brain 143:2532–2544. DA, Sairanen V, Sihvonen AJ (2023) Hodological organization of Indefrey P, Levelt WJM (2004) The spatial and temporal signatures of spoken language production and singing in the human brain. word production components. Cognition 92:101–144. Commun Biol 6:779. Johansson BB, Ohlsson AL (1996) Environment, social interaction, and Racette A, Bard C, Peretz I (2006) Making non-fluent aphasics speak: physical activity as determinants of functional outcome after cere- sing along!. Brain 129:2571–2584. bral infarction in the rat. Exp Neurol 139:322–327. Rheault F, Poulin P, Valcourt Caron A, St-Onge E, Descoteaux M Johnson JK, Graziano AB (2015) Some early cases of aphasia and the (2020) Common misconceptions, hidden biases and modern chal- capacity to sing. Prog Brain Res 216:73–89. lenges of dMRI tractography. J Neural Eng 17:011001. Johnson L, Newman-Norlund R, Teghipco A, Rorden C, Bonilha L, Ripollés P, Marco-Pallares J, de Diego-Balaguer R, Miro J, Falip M, Fridriksson J, Author C (2023) Progressive lesion necrosis is related Juncadella M, Rubio F, Rodriguez-Fornells A (2012) Analysis of to increasing aphasia severity in chronic stroke. medRxiv automated methods for spatial normalization of lesioned brains. 41:2023.06.13.23291362. Neuroimage 60:1296–1306. Kellner E, Dhital B, Kiselev VG, Reisert M (2016) Gibbs-ringing artifact Salah Khlif M, Egorova-Brumley N, Bird LJ, Werden E, Brodtmann A removal based on local subvoxel-shifts. Magn Reson Med (2022) Cortical thinning 3 years after ischaemic stroke is associated 76:1574–1581. with cognitive impairment and APOE ε4. NeuroImage Clin Kertesz A (1982) Western aphasia battery, Ed 1. San Antonio, TX: The 36:103200. Psychological Corporation. Sammler D, Kotz SA, Eckstein K, Ott DVM, Friederici AD (2010) Kertesz A (2007) Western aphasia battery-revised (WAB-R). Prosody meets syntax: the role of the corpus callosum. Brain Kiran S, Meier EL, Johnson JP (2019) Neuroplasticity in aphasia: a pro- 133:2643–2655. posed framework of language recovery. J Speech Lang Hear Res Särkämö T, Sihvonen AJ (2018) Golden oldies and silver brains: defi- 62:3973–3985. cits, preservation, learning, and rehabilitation effects of music in Kleber B, Zeitouni AG, Friberg A, Zatorre RJ (2013) ageing-related neurological disorders. Cortex 109:104–123. Experience-dependent modulation of feedback integration during Saur D, Lange R, Baumgaertner A, Schraknepper V, Willmes K, Rijntjes singing: role of the right anterior insula. J Neurosci 33:6070–6080. M, Weiller C (2006) Dynamics of language reorganization after Leo V, Sihvonen AJ, Linnavalli T, Tervaniemi M, Laine M, Soinila S, stroke. Brain 129:1371–1384. Särkämö T (2018) Sung melody enhances verbal learning and recall Schilling KG, Yeh FC, Nath V, Hansen C, Williams O, Resnick S, after stroke. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1423:296–307. Anderson AW, Landman BA (2019) A fiber coherence index for Loui P (2015) A dual-stream neuroanatomy of singing. Music Percept quality control of B-table orientation in diffusion MRI scans. 32:232–241. Magn Reson Imaging 58:82–89. May 2024, 11(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0408-23.2024. 12 of 13  Research Article: New Research 13 of 13 Schilling KG, et al. (2021) Tractography dissection variability: what Turkeltaub PE, Messing S, Norise C, Hamilton RH (2011) Are networks happens when 42 groups dissect 14 white matter bundles on the for residual language function and recovery consistent across same dataset? Neuroimage 243:118502. aphasic patients? Neurology 76:1726–1734. Schlaug G, Maechina S, Norton A (2008) From singing to Van Der Meulen I, Van De Sandt-Koenderman ME, Ribbers GM (2012) speaking: why singing may lead to recovery of expressive lan- Melodic intonation therapy: present controversies and future guage function in patients with Broca’s aphasia. Music Percept opportunities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 93:S46–S52. 25:315–323. Van Der Meulen I, Van De Sandt-Koenderman WME, Heijenbrok-Kal Schlaug G, Marchina S, Norton A (2009) Evidence for plasticity in MH, Visch-Brink EG, Ribbers GM (2014) The efficacy and timing white-matter tracts of patients with chronic Broca’s aphasia under- of melodic intonation therapy in subacute aphasia. Neurorehabil going intense intonation-based speech therapy. Ann N Y Acad Sci Neural Repair 28:536–544. 1169:385–394. Van Hees S, McMahon K, Angwin A, De Zubicaray G, Read S, Copland Schön D, Gordon R, Campagne A, Magne C, Astésano C, Anton JL, DA (2014) Changes in white matter connectivity following therapy Besson M (2010) Similar cerebral networks in language, music for anomia post stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 28:325–334. and song perception. Neuroimage 51:450–461. Venna VR, Xu Y, Doran SJ, Patrizz A, McCullough LD (2014) Social Seghier ML, Bagdasaryan J, Jung DE, Price CJ (2014a) The impor- interaction plays a critical role in neurogenesis and recovery after tance of premotor cortex for supporting speech production after stroke. Transl Psychiatry 4:e351. left capsular–putaminal damage. J Neurosci 34:14338–14348. Veraart J, Novikov DS, Christiaens D, Ades-aron B, Sijbers J, Seghier ML, Ramsden S, Lim L, Leff AP, Price CJ (2014b) Gradual Fieremans E (2016) Denoising of diffusion MRI using random matrix lesion expansion and brain shrinkage years after stroke. Stroke theory. Neuroimage 142:394–406. 45:877–879. Vetere G, Williams G, Ballard C, Creese B, Hampshire A, Palmer A, Sihvonen AJ, et al. (2020) Vocal music enhances memory and lan- Pickering E, Richards M, Brooker H, Corbett A (2024) The relation- guage recovery after stroke: pooled results from two RCTs. Ann ship between playing musical instruments and cognitive trajecto- Clin Transl Neurol 7:2272–2287. ries: analysis from a UK ageing cohort. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Sihvonen AJ, Särkämö T, Leo V, Tervaniemi M, Altenmüller E, Soinila S 39:e6061. (2017a) Music-based interventions in neurological rehabilitation. Wan CY, Rüber T, Hohmann A, Schlaug G (2010) The therapeutic Lancet Neurol 16:648–660. effects of singing in neurological disorders. Music Percept Sihvonen AJ, Särkämö T, Ripollés P, Leo V, Saunavaara J, Parkkola R, 27:287–295. Rodríguez-Fornells A, Soinila S (2017b) Functional neural changes Wan CY, Zheng X, Marchina S, Norton A, Schlaug G (2014) Intensive associated with acquired amusia across different stages of recov- therapy induces contralateral white matter changes in chronic ery after stroke. Sci Rep 7:11390. stroke patients with Broca’s aphasia. Brain Lang 136:1–7. Sihvonen AJ, Pitkäniemi A, Leo V, Soinila S, Särkämö T (2021a) Whitehead JC, Armony JL (2018) Singing in the brain: neural represen- Resting-state language network neuroplasticity in post-stroke tation of music and voice as revealed by fMRI. Hum Brain Mapp music listening: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Neurosci 39:4913–4924. 54:7886–7898. Yeh FC, Tseng WYI (2011) NTU-90: a high angular resolution brain Sihvonen AJ, Ripollés P, Leo V, Saunavaara J, Parkkola R, atlas constructed by q-space diffeomorphic reconstruction. Rodríguez-Fornells A, Soinila S, Särkämö T (2021b) Vocal music Neuroimage 58:91–99. listening enhances poststroke language network reorganization. Yeh FC, Wedeen VJ, Tseng WYI (2010) Generalized q-sampling imag- eNeuro 8:ENEURO.0158-21.2021. ing. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 29:1626–1635. Siponkoski S-T, et al. (2022) Efficacy of a multicomponent singing Yeh FC, Verstynen TD, Wang Y, Fernández-Miranda JC, Tseng WYI intervention on communication and psychosocial functioning in (2013) Deterministic diffusion fiber tracking improved by quantita- chronic aphasia: a randomized controlled crossover trial. Brain tive anisotropy. PLoS One 8:e80713. Commun 5:fcac337. Yeh FC, Badre D, Verstynen T (2016a) Connectometry: a statistical Sparks R, Helm N, Albert M (1974) Aphasia rehabilitation resulting from approach harnessing the analytical potential of the local connec- melodic intonation therapy. Cortex 10:303–316. tome. Neuroimage 125:162–171. Stefaniak JD, Halai AD, Lambon Ralph MA (2020) The neural and neu- Yeh FC, Vettel JM, Singh A, Poczos B, Grafton ST, Erickson KI, Tseng rocomputational bases of recovery from post-stroke aphasia. Nat WYI, Verstynen TD (2016b) Quantifying differences and similarities Rev Neurol 16:43–55. in whole-brain white matter architecture using local connectome Stefaniak JD, Alyahya RSW, Lambon Ralph MA (2021) Language net- fingerprints. PLoS Comput Biol 12:e1005203. works in aphasia and health: a 1000 participant activation likeli- Yeh FC, Liu L, Hitchens TK, Wu YL (2017) Mapping immune cell infil- hood estimation meta-analysis. Neuroimage 233:117960. tration using restricted diffusion MRI. Magn Reson Med 77:603– Stockert A, Wawrzyniak M, Klingbeil J, Wrede K, Kümmerer D, 612. Hartwigsen G, Kaller CP, Weiller C, Saur D (2020) Dynamics of lan- Yeh FC, Panesar S, Barrios J, Fernandes D, Abhinav K, Meola A, guage reorganization after left temporo-parietal and frontal stroke. Fernandez-Miranda JC (2019) Automatic removal of false connec- Brain 143:844–861. tions in diffusion MRI tractography using topology-informed prun- Tabei KI, Satoh M, Nakano C, Ito A, Shimoji Y, Kida H, Sakuma H, ing (TIP). Neurotherapeutics 16:52–58. Tomimoto H (2016) Improved neural processing efficiency in a Zarate JM (2013) The neural control of singing. Front Hum Neurosci chronic aphasia patient following melodic intonation therapy: a 7:237. neuropsychological and functional MRI study. Front Neurol 7:148. Zhang X, Liu JY, Liao WJ, Chen XP (2021) Differential effects of phys- Thiebaut de Schotten M, Dell’Acqua F, Valabregue R, Catani M (2012) ical and social enriched environment on angiogenesis in male rats Monkey to human comparative anatomy of the frontal lobe associ- after cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury. Front Hum Neurosci ation tracts. Cortex 48:82–96. 15:622911. Tournier JD, Smith R, Raffelt D, Tabbara R, Dhollander T, Pietsch M, Zumbansen A, Peretz I, Hébert S (2014) The combination of rhythm Christiaens D, Jeurissen B, Yeh CH, Connelly A (2019) MRtrix3: a and pitch can account for the beneficial effect of melodic intonation fast, flexible and open software framework for medical image pro- therapy on connected speech improvements in Broca’s aphasia. cessing and visualisation. Neuroimage 202:116137. Front Hum Neurosci 8:592. May 2024, 11(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0408-23.2024. 13 of 13