Public Administration Ethics and Accountability PDF
Document Details
Uploaded by VividAstrophysics4949
Southern Leyte State University
Tags
Related
- Ethics, Power and Accountability (SGXETHPAC) PDF
- CHAPTER 1: Introduction to Ethics and Accountability in the Public Service PDF
- Chapter II: Work Ethics PDF
- MODULE-3.-Organizational-and-Human-Resource-Development-in-LGUs-1.pdf PDF
- Chapter 3: Administrative Responsibility - PDF
- Tema 5: Ética y Valores en la Función Pública PDF
Summary
This document provides lecture notes on public administration ethics and accountability. It discusses the importance of ethical standards and accountability mechanisms, along with the meaning of public service. It also covers relevant issues like bureaucracy, purpose and goals, ethics and values, scope and impact, challenges and opportunities, and effectiveness vs efficiency.
Full Transcript
UNIT III PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION ETHICS AND ACCOUNTABILITY Ø INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES: By the time the students finished the learning experie...
UNIT III PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION ETHICS AND ACCOUNTABILITY Ø INTENDED LEARNING OUTCOMES: By the time the students finished the learning experience, they should have: Cultivate a commitment to ethical behavior by identifying moral and accountable practices in public administration and promoting a culture of ethical behavior and transparency in public service. INTRODUCTION In the field of public administration, ethics and accountability are foundational principles that guide the behavior and decision-‐‑making processes of public officials and agencies. This unit delves into the importance of ethical standards and accountability mechanisms in maintaining public trust and ensuring effective governance. Ethics and accountability are critical components of effective public administration. By upholding ethical standards and ensuring accountability, public servants can enhance public trust, improve service delivery, and contribute to the overall well-‐‑being of society. LECTURE NOTES THE MEANING OF PUBLIC SERVICE One of the most difficult times to define is public service. It is a nebulous term for one has to write miles of words before it can be successfully defined. Government and public service. There has to be a clear distinction between what the government is and what public service means. Government is the political organization comprising the individuals and institutions authorized to collectively formulate public policies for society and conduct affairs of state [Hague 2013; Aruego and Aruego-‐‑Torres 1981]. Governments are empowered to establish and regulate the interrelationships of people within their territorial confines, the relations of the people with the community as a whole, under community’s dealing with other political entities. Public service is the arm of the government in carrying out the will of the state. Public service carries out the programs and courses of action to set out by the people in power. Bureaucracy and Public service. Public service is used interchangeably with the bureaucracy. Bureaucracy refers to the personnel and administrative structure of an organization. Business, labor, religious, educational and governmental systems depend on a large workforce are arranged in a hierarchy to carry out specialized task based on internal rules and procedures. The term is used mainly in referring to government administrations especially those in civil service who are involved in formulating public policies and implementing them [Hague 2013; Cozzeto et al 1996]. However, if the term bureaucracy would be used to substitute for public service, it would limit the concept of public service into an organizational one. Public service is more than a corporate philosophy. In a more critical sense, governmental systems depend on bureaucracy, without which no more than government can function. In some nations, a hindrance to development has been an organized public services system. Throughout history, public service has been recognized as an essential undertaking that contributes to the betterment of society, supported by citizens and politicians alike. It has been recognized that the government could not act out the people’s will without public service. Public service, therefore, is seen here as the arm of the government in carrying out the will of the people. Public service, therefore, must be responsive to the political will of the people. Public service generally refers to activities or roles aimed at serving the community or the public at large, often performed by government employees or organizations. It encompasses a range of functions, from delivering essential services like healthcare and education to ensuring public safety and maintaining infrastructure. Key Aspects of Public Service: § Purpose and Goals: Public service is fundamentally about serving the common good. The primary goal is to improve the quality of life for the community and address societal needs. This often involves balancing competing interests and addressing issues of equity and access. § Ethics and Values: Public servants are expected to uphold high ethical standards, including transparency, accountability, and fairness. Their work should reflect the values of integrity and respect for the public trust. § Scope and Impact: Public service can span various sectors, including health, education, emergency services, and more. Its impact is widespread, affecting communities on a local, national, and even global level. § Challenges and Opportunities: Public service roles often come with unique challenges, such as working with limited resources, navigating complex bureaucracies, and addressing diverse and sometimes conflicting needs. However, these roles also offer the opportunity to make significant and positive changes in society. Discussion Points: o Effectiveness vs. Efficiency: How should public service organizations balance the need to be effective in meeting public needs with the need to use resources efficiently? o Accountability: In what ways can public service organizations ensure they are accountable to the public and maintain transparency? o Role of Innovation: How can innovation and technology enhance the delivery of public services while still maintaining a focus on accessibility and inclusivity? o Public Perception: How does the perception of public service impact its effectiveness, and what can be done to improve public trust in these institutions? These points can serve as a basis for deeper exploration into the meaning and implications of public service. ETHICAL PRINCIPLES IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Definition of Ethics: Ethics refers to the moral principles that govern behavior and decision-‐‑ making. In public administration, ethics involves principles of fairness, integrity, and accountability in managing public resources and serving the public. Importance: Ethical behavior in public administration ensures trust, promotes fairness, and enhances the effectiveness of public institutions. Key Ethical Principles: § Integrity: Adhering to moral and ethical standards, being honest, and ensuring transparency in all actions. § Accountability: Taking responsibility for actions and decisions, and being answerable to the public and oversight bodies. § Impartiality: Making decisions based on fairness and objectivity, without favoritism or bias. § Respect for the Law: Complying with legal standards and regulations, and upholding the rule of law. § Public Service: Prioritizing the public interest over personal gain, and ensuring that actions and decisions benefit the community. Ethical Dilemmas in Public Administration § Conflict of Interest: Situations where personal or financial interests may compromise the ability to act impartially. Example: A public official awarding a contract to a company owned by a family member. § Corruption: Abuse of power for personal gain, including bribery, embezzlement, and fraud. Example: Accepting bribes to influence a decision or bypass regulations. § Nepotism and Favoritism: Preferential treatment of relatives or friends in hiring or promotion decisions. Example: Appointing a less qualified candidate to a position due to personal connections. § Transparency and Disclosure: Balancing the need for public transparency with the protection of sensitive or confidential information. Example: Deciding whether to disclose internal audit results that might cause public concern but are essential for accountability. Ethical Decision-‐‑Making Frameworks § Utilitarian Approach: Evaluating decisions based on the greatest good for the greatest number of people. This involves assessing the outcomes and impacts of decisions on different stakeholders. § Deontological Approach: Focusing on the adherence to duties, rules, and principles. This approach emphasizes doing what is right according to ethical principles, regardless of the consequences. § Virtue Ethics: Emphasizing the development of moral character and virtues. Decisions are guided by what a virtuous person would do in a similar situation. § Principle-‐‑Based Approach: Using established ethical principles, such as those found in codes of ethics, to guide decision-‐‑making. ACCOUNTABILITY IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Definition: Accountability in public administration refers to the duty of public officials to justify their actions, decisions, and use of resources. It encompasses the obligation to report, explain, and be answerable for their performance, ensuring that they act in the public interest. Importance: § Public Trust: Accountability builds and maintains public trust in government institutions. When citizens see that officials are held responsible for their actions, they are more likely to have confidence in the system. § Good Governance: It ensures that government actions align with legal and ethical standards, promoting fairness and integrity. § Performance Improvement: Accountability mechanisms can highlight inefficiencies and promote improvements in public service delivery. Principles of Accountability § Transparency: The principle that decisions and actions should be conducted openly, allowing stakeholders to see how and why decisions are made. Implementation: Public officials should provide access to information about their decisions and performance. This could include publishing reports, budgets, and performance metrics. § Responsiveness: The ability of public institutions to address and adapt to public needs and concerns. Implementation: Government agencies should establish channels for feedback and complaints, and respond to them in a timely and effective manner. § Responsibility: Public officials are responsible for carrying out their duties effectively and adhering to established policies and laws. Implementation: Officials should be clear about their roles and responsibilities, and there should be systems to monitor and evaluate their performance. § Answerability: The obligation to explain and justify actions and decisions to stakeholders. Implementation: Officials should provide explanations for their actions and be prepared to defend their decisions in public forums or through formal reports. § Enforcement: Mechanisms to ensure that accountability is maintained and violations are addressed. Implementation: There should be procedures for investigating misconduct, imposing sanctions, and taking corrective actions when necessary. Mechanisms for Accountability Internal Mechanisms Internal Audits: § Purpose: To review and evaluate an organization's operations and financial activities. § Function: Internal audits help ensure compliance with policies and regulations, detect inefficiencies, and prevent fraud. Performance Reviews: § Purpose: To assess the effectiveness and efficiency of public services and programs. § Function: Performance reviews help identify areas for improvement and ensure that services meet their objectives. Management Controls: § Purpose: To establish systems and procedures for ensuring adherence to policies. § Function: Management controls include financial controls, operational procedures, and risk management strategies. External Mechanisms Public Oversight: § Purpose: To involve the public in monitoring and evaluating government activities. § Function: Public oversight can be exercised through media, civil society organizations, and public forums, promoting transparency and accountability. Legislative Oversight: § Purpose: To provide a check on executive actions through parliamentary or congressional committees. § Function: Legislative bodies review and approve budgets, hold hearings, and investigate government activities to ensure compliance with laws and policies. Judicial Review: § Purpose: To adjudicate disputes and ensure that government actions adhere to legal standards. § Function: Courts can review administrative decisions, enforce legal rights, and provide remedies for violations. Challenges in Accountability Corruption: § Impact: Corruption undermines transparency, diverts resources, and erodes public trust. § Mitigation: Anti-‐‑corruption measures include stricter regulations, whistleblower protections, and independent auditing. Lack of Resources: § Impact: Limited financial or human resources can impede effective monitoring and enforcement. § Mitigation: Improving resource allocation, increasing efficiency, and leveraging technology can address resource constraints. Political Interference: § Impact: Political actors may obstruct accountability processes to avoid scrutiny or gain personal advantages. § Mitigation: Ensuring independence of oversight bodies, enforcing legal frameworks, and promoting a culture of integrity can counteract political interference. Complexity of Bureaucracy: § Impact: Large and complex bureaucratic structures can make it difficult to track performance and hold officials accountable. § Mitigation: Streamlining processes, improving organizational transparency, and enhancing communication can simplify accountability mechanisms. SYNTHESIS Ethics and accountability form the bedrock of effective public administration, ensuring that public officials act with integrity and transparency. Ethics in public administration revolves around core values such as integrity, impartiality, and transparency. These values are upheld through ethical frameworks and guidelines, including codes of conduct and legal standards, which provide a clear directive for public servants' behavior. Understanding these principles is crucial for identifying and resolving ethical dilemmas that may arise in the course of public service. Accountability, on the other hand, is the mechanism through which public officials are held responsible for their actions. Various forms of accountability—political, legal, administrative, and social—work in tandem to ensure that public servants answer to the citizens they serve. Mechanisms like audits, evaluations, and oversight bodies are essential in maintaining this accountability, thereby preventing corruption and enhancing transparency. REFERENCES § Dubnick, M. & Frederickson H. (2011). Public accountability performance measurement, the extended state and the search for trust . Kettering Foundation § Cooper, T. (2001). Handbook of administrative ethics. Marcel Dekker, Inc.