Introduction to International Organisations (IOs) Study Guide PDF

Summary

This document provides an introduction to international organisations (IOs), exploring core theoretical approaches such as realism, liberalism, and constructivism. It examines the role of the UN, international law, and global governance, offering insights into the influence and limitations of IOs in shaping the international landscape.

Full Transcript

**Poli 345 --** **Introduction to International Organisations (IOs)** **Key Theoretical Approaches** **Realism and IOs** - **Core argument:** IOs serve as instruments for powerful states rather than autonomous entities. - **Mearsheimer (1995) - The False Promise of International Inst...

**Poli 345 --** **Introduction to International Organisations (IOs)** **Key Theoretical Approaches** **Realism and IOs** - **Core argument:** IOs serve as instruments for powerful states rather than autonomous entities. - **Mearsheimer (1995) - The False Promise of International Institutions:** - IOs lack independent enforcement power and merely facilitate state interests. - Security concerns often override multilateralism. - Example: NATO's evolution post-Cold War and its role in US-led interventions. - **Relative vs. Absolute Gains:** - **Relative gains:** States prioritise comparative advantage over collective benefits. - **Absolute gains:** IOs encourage cooperation, but states remain cautious of imbalances. **Neo-Liberal Institutionalism** - **Core argument:** IOs help mitigate anarchy by fostering trust and reducing transaction costs. - **Keohane & Nye, Axelrod -- Shadow of the Future:** - Repeated interactions incentivise compliance over time. - IOs promote cooperation by reducing uncertainty and encouraging reciprocity. - **Case study:** WTO's enforcement of trade agreements to prevent economic disputes. **Constructivism and IOs** - **Core argument:** IOs shape state identities and interests through norms. - **Barnett & Finnemore -- IOs and Norm Diffusion:** - IOs establish legitimacy by appearing neutral and authoritative. - Example: IMF's influence over economic policies through expert recommendations. - **Ian Hurd -- Compliance Through Legitimacy:** - IOs function effectively when states accept their authority as legitimate. - **Examples:** UN peacekeeping, ICJ rulings, and economic governance. **Critical Theory and IOs** - **Core argument:** IOs perpetuate power asymmetries and global inequalities. - **Robert Cox -- IOs as Hegemonic Tools:** - IOs reinforce capitalist systems and suppress alternative economic models. - **Gramsci -- Hegemony and Institutional Consent:** - IOs shape ideology, presenting neoliberal economic policies as universal. - **Examples:** - IMF's structural adjustment programs disadvantaging the Global South. - ILO's historical conflicts over labour protections for working-class women. **The United Nations and Global Governance** **UN Security Council (UNSC)** - **Elite Pacts (Voeten):** - P5 members exert disproportionate influence through informal bargaining. - Legitimacy ensures compliance but is secondary to power politics. - **Article 51 -- Self-Defence Justifications:** - States seek UN endorsement for military interventions (e.g., Gulf War 1991). - **Chapter 7 -- Legal Basis for Intervention:** - **Pre-1990:** Limited military enforcement mechanisms. - **Post-1990:** Expansion of peacekeeping and intervention mandates. **UN General Assembly (UNGA) and Soft Balancing** - **Post-Cold War Shift:** - Rising US dominance triggered opposition through UNGA resolutions. - **Examples:** - UNGA criticisms of US-led military actions. - Symbolic nature of non-binding resolutions to challenge superpowers. **Thompson -- UN as a Legitimacy Conduit** - **Two-step process:** - **Step 1:** IOs communicate coercive threats to reduce resistance. - **Step 2:** Public discourse validates military interventions. - **Example:** 1991 Gulf War -- UN approval ensured broad coalition support. **International Law and IOs** **UNSC and Legal Authority (Hurd 2014)** - **Intersection of Law, Politics, and Power:** - Legal framing adapts to major powers' geopolitical interests. - **Example:** Iraq invasion (2003) without explicit UN backing. - **International Court of Justice (ICJ):** - Rulings depend on state compliance, with enforcement reliant on UNSC. - Example: Nicaragua v. USA (1984), where US refused ICJ jurisdiction. **Norms, Constructivism, and Global Influence** **Norm Life Cycle (Finnemore & Sikkink)** 1. **Norm Emergence:** Advocacy by norm entrepreneurs. 2. **Norm Cascade:** Widespread adoption through IOs and states. 3. **Norm Internalisation:** Becomes accepted as standard practice. - **Examples:** - Red Cross redefining rules of war. - Global adoption of women's suffrage. **Epistemic Communities and Policy Influence** - **IOs as Knowledge Brokers:** - WHO shaping global health policies. - IMF structuring economic reforms. - **Critique:** - **Numbers mask political choices:** - Example: World Bank data framing poverty in purely economic terms. **Peacekeeping and Humanitarian Norms** **R2P and Intervention Debates** - **Bellamy -- R2P vs. State Sovereignty:** - ICC indictments deter war criminals from negotiating peace. - **Finnemore -- Selectivity in Humanitarian Interventions:** - Unequal responses to crises (e.g., Rwanda 1994 vs. Kosovo 1999). **Peacekeeping Failures (Autesserre)** - **Social Framing Biases:** - Incorrect assessments misguide intervention strategies. - Example: Misreading Congo's ongoing violence as post-conflict. **Feminism, the ILO, and Labour Rights** **Four Waves of Feminism and IOs** 1. **First Wave:** Legal equality and suffrage rights. 2. **Second Wave:** Patriarchy critique and structural reforms. 3. **Third Wave:** Intersectionality and racial inclusion. 4. **Fourth Wave:** Integrated struggles of race, gender, and class. **ILO and Gender Policies** - **Protectionist vs. Equality Approach:** - Initial ILO conventions restricted women's labour participation. - Marxist feminists opposed bourgeois emphasis on suffrage over economic rights. - **Post-WW2 Evolution:** - Shift towards gender parity in labour rights. - Example: 1981 ILO reforms promoting equal parental leave. **Conclusion: IOs -- Powerful or Limited?** - **Realists:** IOs remain subordinate to state interests. - **Neo-Liberals:** IOs enhance cooperation but depend on power dynamics. - **Constructivists:** IOs shape norms, altering state behaviour over time. - **Critical Theorists:** IOs reinforce dominant economic and political structures. **Additional But Useful Insights** **Expanded Case Studies** - **Iraq War (2003):** UNSC failure to legitimise intervention. - **UN Peacekeeping Missions:** Failures in Congo, Lebanon, Somalia. - **ICJ Disputes Beyond Nicaragua:** Broadening legal precedents. **Institutional Politics in IOs** - **Thompson's "Transmission Belt" Model:** Role of IOs in shaping intervention narratives. - **Hurd's Perspective on International Law:** Legal flexibility and state compliance. - **Autesserre's Social Frameworks in Peacekeeping:** The role of misperceptions in failed interventions. **Key IOs Beyond the UN** - **ILO's Evolution:** From protectionism to gender equality. - **WTO, IMF, and World Bank:** Economic governance and global policy. - **Veto Power and Decision-Making in IOs:** The politics behind symbolic resolutions.

Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser