Literature Review Grp 3 PDF

SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES DEPARTMENT OF SOCIOLOGY AND ANTHROPOLOGY. COURSE TITTLE: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY COURSE CODE: SAS 801 GROUP MEMBERS; 1. RODGERS MUO MA/FA/00067/024 2. PAUL KEDA MA/FA/0067/023 3. MICHAEL OPIYO MA/FA/00083/024 ASSIGNMENT QUESTION (GROUP 3) **Literature revi...

SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES DEPARTMENT OF SOCIOLOGY AND ANTHROPOLOGY. COURSE TITTLE: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY COURSE CODE: SAS 801 GROUP MEMBERS; 1. RODGERS MUO MA/FA/00067/024 2. PAUL KEDA MA/FA/0067/023 3. MICHAEL OPIYO MA/FA/00083/024 ASSIGNMENT QUESTION (GROUP 3) **Literature review, knowledge gaps, and stating a research question/problem** - Evaluating research articles - Identifying research gaps - Writing a literature review - Choosing research question /research problem 1. **Evaluating research articles** Research articles: Research articles are scholarly papers that present original findings or analysis on a specific topic, typically based on empirical research or theoretical frameworks. These articles undergo a peer-review process before publication in academic journals, ensuring the quality and validity of the research, (Google scholar, PubMed). Evaluating research articles involves critical analysis to assess their quality, relevance, and credibility. Here's a structured approach to evaluate a research article effectively: 1\. Assess the Title and Abstract Title: Does it accurately reflect the scope and focus of the research? Abstract: Does it summarize the key points (objective, methodology, results, and conclusion)? Is it concise and informative? 2\. Evaluate the Introduction Background and Rationale: Does the introduction provide sufficient context? Is the research question clearly stated? Objectives: Are the aims or hypotheses clearly defined and relevant? 3\. Examine the Literature Review Coverage: Does the article review relevant, up-to-date literature? Gaps in Knowledge: Does the study address a specific gap in the existing research? Theoretical Framework: Is there a strong conceptual or theoretical foundation guiding the research? 4\. Analyze the Methodology Design: Is the study design (e.g., experimental, observational, qualitative, quantitative) appropriate for the research question? Sampling: Are the sampling methods and sample size adequate and well-explained? Is the population representative? Data Collection: Are the data collection methods valid and reliable? Are they clearly described? Ethical Considerations: Were ethical standards upheld, and was ethics approval obtained? 5\. Evaluate the Results Clarity: Are the results presented clearly, with appropriate use of tables, graphs, or figures? Data Analysis: Were the data analysis methods (e.g., statistical tests) appropriate for the research design and data? Findings: Are the findings consistent with the objectives? Do they address the research questions? 6\. Scrutinize the Discussion Interpretation: Does the discussion interpret the results appropriately in relation to the hypotheses or research questions? Comparisons: Does it compare findings with those from other studies? Implications: Are the practical or theoretical implications discussed? Does the author acknowledge the study\'s limitations? Conclusion: Is the conclusion justified by the results? Does it provide insights into future research directions? 7\. Consider the References Relevance and Credibility: Are the references current and from reputable sources? Do they cover key studies in the field? Citation Style: Is the article properly referenced following a standard citation format? 8\. Assess Overall Structure and Writing Clarity and Cohesion: Is the article well-organized and easy to follow? Objectivity: Is the writing free from bias or excessive speculation? 9\. Review for Peer-Reviewed Publication Journal Impact: Is the article published in a peer-reviewed journal with a strong reputation in the field? Author Credentials: Do the authors have expertise in the field of study? 10\. Critical Appraisal of Limitations and Bias Acknowledgment of Bias: Are any potential biases or limitations of the study acknowledged and addressed? Generalizability: Can the findings be generalized to a larger population, or are they specific to the study sample? 11\. Relevance to Your Research or Field Applicability: Does the article contribute new, valuable insights to your area of interest or research? Originality: Does the study offer a novel perspective or replication of prior work? By following these steps, you can critically evaluate the quality and applicability of a research article, (Research Gate, JSTOR digital library, ScienceDirect-a full text scientific database, Academia.edu, an online platform for academics to share research papers). 2. **Identifying research gaps** Identifying research gaps is a key step in conducting research, as it helps you focus on areas that are underexplored or not yet fully understood. Here's how you can systematically identify research gaps: (Robinson, K.A, Saldahna,I.J; & Mckoy, N.A.(2011). Development of a framework to identify research gaps from Systematic reviews). 1\. Review the Literature Thoroughly Read Systematically: Start with a broad review of the existing literature on your topic. This includes peer-reviewed articles, books, theses, and conference papers. Focus on high-quality sources and seminal works. Identify Themes: Look for common themes, findings, and methods across multiple studies. Note Areas of Consensus and Disagreement: Areas where studies agree are often well-researched, while points of disagreement or conflicting findings may indicate a gap. Study Chronology: Pay attention to the timeline of research. Are there areas that were studied intensively in the past but have since seen limited research? 2\. Analyze Limitations in Existing Studies Recognized Limitations: Authors often explicitly state limitations at the end of their studies. Look for mentions of insufficient sample sizes, methodological weaknesses, or unexplored variables. Narrow Focus: Some studies may cover very specific populations, geographic areas, or contexts. This could highlight an opportunity to study the same topic in a different setting or a broader population. Overlooked Variables: Are there factors or variables that have been consistently ignored or under-analyzed? This could be a potential research gap. 3\. Look for Outdated Research Technological and Social Changes: Studies conducted in the past may no longer be relevant due to technological advances, social changes, or new theoretical developments. New Methods: Recent developments in data collection and analysis methods may provide opportunities to revisit older research questions with a fresh approach. Timeliness: If there hasn\'t been much recent work in a particular area, it may be due for revisiting. 4\. Explore Understudied Populations or Contexts Demographic Gaps: Look for gaps in terms of demographic factors like age, gender, ethnicity, or socioeconomic status. For example, research may focus heavily on adults but neglect children or the elderly. Geographic Gaps: Some regions or countries might be underrepresented in the research. Expanding studies to different cultural or geographical contexts can fill important gaps. Sector-Specific Gaps: Some studies might focus on specific industries or sectors, leaving others unexamined. 5\. Identify Theoretical or Conceptual Gaps Unexplored Theories: Are there alternative theoretical frameworks or models that could be applied to the same research question? Studies often rely on dominant theories, and using a less common or new framework might reveal fresh insights. Interdisciplinary Opportunities: Combining theories or methods from different disciplines could lead to unique perspectives and fill gaps that single-discipline studies overlook. 6\. Check for Conflicting Results Contradictory Findings: When studies on the same topic produce conflicting results, this is often a sign that more research is needed to resolve discrepancies. Lack of Replication: If a finding has not been replicated or tested in different contexts, this may indicate a gap in the research. 7\. Assess the Breadth of the Research Question Overarching vs. Specific Questions: Some research questions are too broad, while others are overly specific. Finding a gap may involve adjusting the scope of the question---focusing on a more specific aspect or exploring a broader view. Emerging Fields or Issues: In rapidly evolving fields (e.g., technology, medicine, or social trends), new problems or questions often emerge faster than research can keep up. Stay current with these trends to spot opportunities for new research. 8\. Look for Calls for Future Research Recommendations in Articles: Many articles include a section where authors suggest areas for future research. These recommendations often point directly to research gaps. Unanswered Questions: If a study raises new questions that were not addressed, these might be good starting points for new research. 9\. Use Bibliometric Analysis Citation Analysis: Look at which studies are most frequently cited and see whether there are areas or topics that are under-referenced, suggesting gaps in the literature. Co-citation or Co-author relationship Analysis: Identify groups of studies or authors that frequently collaborate. This can help you find clusters of research and see what related areas may be neglected. 10\. Engage in Expert Consultation Discussions with Researchers: Talking to experts in the field can help you identify research gaps that may not be immediately apparent through literature reviews. Conference Participation: Attending conferences can expose you to current debates, emerging trends, and underexplored topics. 11\. Analyze Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Identify Consensus and Discrepancies: These types of articles often summarize the state of research in a field and can highlight where evidence is strong and where it is lacking. Recommendations for Future Research: Systematic reviews usually point out areas that need more study. 12\. Use Research Databases for Trend Analysis Keyword Trends: Analyze the frequency of key terms in research databases (e.g., PubMed, Scopus) to see which topics are trending and which are underrepresented. Topic Networks: Use tools like VOSviewer or Citespace to create visual maps of topics or research clusters and identify areas that might be less explored. By following these methods, you can systematically identify gaps in the literature and uncover areas where your research can make a meaningful contribution. 3. **Writing literature review** Writing a literature review involves synthesizing and critically analyzing the existing body of knowledge on a particular topic. A well-structured literature review provides an overview of relevant research, identifies gaps in the literature, and lays the foundation for your own research. Here's a step-by-step guide to writing an effective literature review: 1\. Define the Scope and Objectives Topic Focus: Clearly define the specific topic or research question you are addressing. Narrow your focus to ensure the review is relevant and manageable. Purpose: Decide whether your literature review is part of a larger research project (e.g., thesis, dissertation, or research paper) or a stand-alone review. Your purpose may be to summarize the literature, highlight gaps, or critically analyze research trends. Timeframe and Criteria: Set clear parameters for your review, such as the time period (e.g., studies from the last 10 years) and types of sources (e.g., peer-reviewed articles, books). 2\. Conduct a Comprehensive Literature Search Databases: Use academic databases such as Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, JSTOR, and Web of Science to find relevant sources. Search Terms: Use a combination of broad and specific search terms related to your topic. For example, if you are researching the impact of social media on mental health, use terms like "social media," "mental health," "depression," "anxiety," and "adolescents." Filter Sources: Prioritize peer-reviewed articles, reputable books, and authoritative reports. Avoid sources with low credibility, such as opinion pieces or unverified websites. 3\. Organize and Categorize the Literature Thematic Organization: Group the literature into themes or categories based on common ideas or approaches. For example, you might categorize studies by theoretical frameworks, methodologies, or key findings. Chronological Organization: Alternatively, you can arrange your review chronologically to show how research on the topic has evolved over time. Methodological Organization: Another option is to categorize studies based on their methodology (e.g., qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-methods research). Use a reference management tool like Zotero, Mendeley, or EndNote to organize and keep track of your sources. 4\. Analyze and Synthesize the Literature Summarize Key Findings: Briefly summarize the key points of each study, including the research question, methods, results, and conclusions. Avoid simply listing studies; instead, aim to create a cohesive narrative. Compare and Contrast: Identify areas of agreement, disagreement, or controversy within the literature. Analyze why certain studies may have different results and what this indicates about the field. Identify Trends and Patterns: Look for trends in methodologies, theoretical approaches, or findings. Are there recurring themes? Has the field shifted over time? Evaluate Methodological Rigor: Assess the strengths and weaknesses of each study, paying attention to sample size, research design, and potential biases. Consider whether the conclusions drawn by the authors are justified by the data. Identify Gaps and Limitations: Point out areas that have not been thoroughly explored or where further research is needed. This will help you establish the significance of your own research. 5\. Structure Your Literature Review A well-structured literature review should have the following components: 6\. Write Clearly and Concisely Avoid Jargon: Write in a clear and accessible style, avoiding unnecessary jargon or overly complex language. Stay Focused: Ensure that every point you make relates to your research question or objectives. Maintain Objectivity: While it\'s important to critically evaluate studies, be sure to do so in a balanced and objective manner. 7\. Edit and Revise Proofread for Clarity: Ensure that your review flows logically and that your ideas are clearly articulated. Make sure transitions between sections are smooth. Check for Consistency: Verify that you have consistently cited all sources and that your review maintains a coherent structure. Citation Style: Ensure that you are following the appropriate citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.) consistently throughout the review. 8\. Cite All Sources Appropriately In-Text Citations: Make sure that every idea, quote, or reference from another source is properly cited within the text. Reference List: At the end of your literature review, include a full reference list that complies with your selected citation style. **Example Outline of a Literature Review** - Introduction - Introduce the topic and its significance - Define the scope of the review - State your research question or thesis - Body - Theme 1: Summarize and analyze studies related to theme 1 - Theme 2: Summarize and analyze studies related to theme 2 - Methodological Considerations: Discuss the methodologies used in the studies and their strengths/weaknesses - Gaps and Contradictions: Highlight any gaps, contradictions, or underexplored areas - Conclusion - Summarize key insights from the review - Discuss implications for your research - Suggest areas for future research By following this structured approach, you can write a comprehensive, well-organized, and critical literature review that effectively summarizes the current state of knowledge in your field and sets the stage for your own research. 4. **Choosing research question/research problem** Choosing a research question or research problem is one of the most critical steps in the research process, as it determines the focus and scope of your study. A well-defined research question guides your literature review, research design, and data collection, ensuring that your research is both meaningful and manageable. Here's a step-by-step guide to help you choose a strong research question or research problem: (Bryaman, A. (2007). The research question in social research, Farrugia, P., Petrisor, BA; Farrokyar, F; & Bhandari, M (2010). Research questions, hypotheses and objectives. Lipowski, E.E (2008). Developing great research questions. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 65(17), 1667-1670). 1\. Identify a General Area of Interest Passion and Relevance: Start by selecting a broad topic that interests you and is relevant to your field of study. This ensures that you stay motivated throughout the research process. Align with Expertise: Consider your own knowledge, skills, and background. Choose a topic where you have some foundation or expertise. Current Trends and Issues: Explore emerging issues or trends in your field by reading recent literature, attending conferences, and following discussions among experts. 2\. Conduct Preliminary Literature Review Explore Existing Research: Begin by reviewing key articles, books, and reports related to your broad topic. This helps you understand what has already been studied and identify gaps in the literature. Identify Gaps or Underexplored Areas: Look for questions that have not been answered or areas that have been under-researched. Pay attention to recommendations for future research in articles, as they often point directly to open questions or unresolved problems. Evaluate Contradictory Findings: Studies with conflicting results may suggest an area where further research is needed. 3\. Narrow down Your Focus Refine the Topic: Narrow your broad topic into a more specific area of inquiry. For example, instead of focusing on \"social media and mental health,\" you might refine it to \"the impact of Instagram on teenage self-esteem.\" Specific vs. General: Ensure that your topic is not too broad (which makes it hard to manage) or too narrow (which might make it difficult to find enough material). Aim for a balance that allows for depth but is also feasible within your time and resource constraints. Target Population or Context: Consider focusing on a particular population, group, or context. For example, instead of studying "employee satisfaction," you might examine "employee satisfaction among remote workers in the tech industry." 4\. Brainstorm Potential Research Questions Start Broad: Write down several broad questions that interest you based on your refined topic. Ask "How" and "Why": Frame questions that explore relationships, causes, processes, or mechanisms (e.g., "How does social media use affect self-esteem in adolescents?" or "Why do some organizations experience higher turnover rates among remote workers?"). Generate Multiple Questions: Don't limit yourself to one question at first. Generate multiple options so you can evaluate them later based on feasibility, relevance, and interest. 5\. Evaluate Your Research Questions To choose the best research question, evaluate each one based on the following criteria: 6\. Formulate a Strong Research Question Once you've narrowed down your options, refine the chosen question to ensure it is focused, clear, and researchable. A strong research question often has the following characteristics: - Specific: It is precise and focuses on a particular issue, population, or concept. - Measurable: It can be explored through observation, experimentation, or data collection. - Researchable: There is enough existing literature to build upon, and the data is accessible. - Significant: It contributes new knowledge or addresses a meaningful problem in the field. 7\. Types of Research Questions Different types of research questions serve different purposes: 8\. Test the Question Before finalizing the research question, test it by answering the following: - Is the question feasible given your resources? - Can you find sufficient data or literature to inform your research? - Will answering this question lead to a meaningful contribution in your field? 9\. Refine the Question if Necessary After evaluating your question, refine it to ensure it is clear, concise, and researchable. You might need to narrow it further or adjust it based on available resources, or new insights from your literature review. By following this process, you'll be able to craft a research question or research problem that is focused, relevant, and feasible, setting the stage for a successful research project. **REFERENCES** Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review (2nd ed.). Sage. Fink, A. (2020). Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper (5th ed.). Sage. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333--339. Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356-367. Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91--108. Robinson, K. A., Saldanha, I. J., & McKoy, N. A. (2011). Development of a framework to identify research gaps from systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64(12), 1325--1330. Callahan, J. L. (2014). Writing literature reviews: A reprise and update. Human Resource Development Review, 13(3), 271--275. Sandberg, J., & Alvesson, M. (2011). Ways of constructing research questions: Gap-spotting or problematization? Organization, 18(1), 23--44. Mullins, A. M. (2004). Research gaps: Guidance for discovering research gaps and how to address them. IEEE Transactions on Education, 47(2), 144--149. Beyea, S. C., & Nicoll, L. H. (1998). Writing an integrative research review: The step-by-step process. AORN Journal, 67(4), 877--880. Greenhalgh, T. (2014). How to read a paper: The basics of evidence-based medicine (5th ed.). BMJ Books. Wager, E., & Kleinert, S. (2010). Responsible research publication: International standards for authors. Promoting Research Integrity in a Global Environment, 309-316. Cook, D. J., Mulrow, C. D., & Haynes, R. B. (1997). Systematic reviews: Synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Annals of Internal Medicine, 126(5), 376--380. Bettany-Saltikov, J. (2012). How to do a systematic literature review in nursing: A step-by-step guide. McGraw-Hill Education. Hulley, S. B., Cummings, S. R., Browner, W. S., Grady, D., & Newman, T. B. (2013). Designing clinical research (4th ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Bryman, A. (2007). The research question in social research: What is its role? International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 10(1), 5--20. Farrugia, P., Petrisor, B. A., Farrokhyar, F., & Bhandari, M. (2010). Research questions, hypotheses, and objectives. Canadian Journal of Surgery, 53(4), 278--281. Lipowski, E. E. (2008). Developing great research questions. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 65(17), 1667-1670. Levine, M. N., & Julian, J. A. (2004). Selecting the best study design for a research question. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 57(5), 508--514.