Research Methodology and Peer Review Process

True (A)

To identify existing knowledge on the topic, highlight gaps in research, and provide a theoretical foundation for the study.

<p>design</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>Was informed consent obtained from participants? (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>Title = Accurately reflects the study's scope and focus Abstract = Summarizes the key points of the study Introduction = Provides context, states the research question, and outlines objectives Literature Review = Identifies relevant literature, highlights gaps in knowledge, and provides a theoretical framework Methodology = Describes the research design, sampling methods, data collection, and ethical considerations Results = Presents the findings of the study clearly and concisely Discussion = Interprets the findings, discusses their implications, and suggests future research directions</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>True (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>Combining theories or methods from different disciplines (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>To identify consensus and discrepancies in a field and highlight areas where evidence is strong or lacking.</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>citation analysis</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>Check for Conflicting Results = Compare different studies on the same topic for contradictory findings Assess the Breadth of the Research Question = Evaluate whether research questions are too broad or specific Look for Calls for Future Research = Identify recommendations or unanswered questions within research articles Use Bibliometric Analysis = Analyze citation patterns and co-authorship to identify research gaps</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>New problems or questions often arise faster than research can keep up in rapidly evolving fields.</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>Analyzing systematic reviews and meta-analyses (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>VOSviewer (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>True (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>To synthesize and critically analyze existing knowledge on a topic, identify gaps in the literature, and lay the foundation for new research.</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>scope</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>All of the above (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>True (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>PubMed = Biomedical and life sciences Scopus = Multidisciplinary research database JSTOR = Arts, humanities, and social sciences Google Scholar = Comprehensive search engine for scholarly literature</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>Peer-reviewed articles, reputable books, authoritative reports, time period, journal impact factor, author expertise.</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>Generalizability of findings across different populations (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>Two potential ways to identify gaps related to understudied populations are: 1. Analyzing demographic gaps (e.g., research focusing heavily on adults but neglecting children or elderly) and 2. Examining geographic gaps (e.g., specific regions or countries being underrepresented in the research).</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>disagreement</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>Quantitative research = May overlook the nuanced experiences and perspectives of individuals. Qualitative research = May be difficult to generalize findings to a wider population. Mixed methods research = Can be complex and time-consuming to conduct. Systematic review = May be limited by the availability of published studies on the topic.</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>True (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>Two ways technology and social changes can make older research outdated are: 1. Technological advances might make older methods obsolete or might introduce new data sources not available previously. 2. Social changes in attitudes, values, or behaviors might make older findings or theories irrelevant to current circumstances.</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>Conducting new experiments and data collection (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>Chronological and Methodological (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>To identify recurring themes and understand how the field has shifted over time.</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>methodological rigor</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>To highlight the originality of your own research. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>Avoid Jargon = Using clear and accessible language Stay Focused = Ensuring every point relates to the research question Maintain Objectivity = Presenting information impartially, without bias</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>True (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>Consistent citation style and maintaining a coherent structure throughout the review.</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>True (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>Personal interests of the researcher (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>narrow</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>Descriptive = Focus on describing a particular phenomenon or situation Exploratory = Aim to investigate a phenomenon that is not well-understood Explanatory = Seek to explain the relationship between variables Evaluative = Assess the effectiveness or impact of a program or intervention</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>Refining a research question ensures it is clear, concise, and researchable. It may involve narrowing the focus, adjusting the scope, or incorporating insights from the literature review.</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>What is the impact of social media on self-esteem in teenagers? (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

<p>Answers will vary, but should reflect a question that contributes to a field and is realistically achievable within the scope of the research. Example: &quot;How does early childhood literacy intervention programs impact reading comprehension in low-income students?&quot;</p> Signup and view all the answers

Sources such as peer-reviewed articles, books, and theses that are credible and well-researched.

Looking for common patterns and findings across multiple studies in research.

Assessing areas where studies agree or conflict, indicating research gaps.

Examining the timeline of research to find areas of intensive study and gaps.

Issues authors mention in their studies, such as sample size or methodology flaws.

Research that may no longer apply due to new developments or changes in society.

Lack of research focusing on certain demographic variables like age or ethnicity.

Alternative frameworks that could offer new insights into established research questions.

Scholarly papers presenting original findings based on research.

Critical analysis to assess research quality, relevance, and credibility.

Check if the title reflects research scope and if the abstract summarizes key points.

Analyze whether the background, rationale, and research questions are clear.

Assess if the article covers relevant literature and identifies gaps in knowledge.

Evaluate if the research design, sampling, and data collection are appropriate and clear.

Determine if results are well-presented and if data analysis methods are suitable.

Assessment of whether ethical standards were upheld in research.

Combining methods from different fields to gain new insights.

Different studies on the same topic yield contradictory results, signaling a need for further research.

When findings are not tested multiple times, it suggests potential gaps in research validation.

Research questions can be too broad or too narrow; adjusting scope can reveal gaps.

New problems in fast-evolving areas often outpace available research, creating gaps.

Authors often suggest new areas to explore in their articles, revealing potential research gaps.

Using citation practices to find under-referenced topics can expose literature gaps.

Discussing with field experts can uncover less obvious research needs.

Analyzing the frequency of key terms in research databases to identify trending topics.

Visual maps created using tools like VOSviewer to show research clusters and identify gaps.

A synthesis and critical analysis of existing research on a specific topic.

Define the focus and purpose of your literature review clearly.

Systematically searching databases for relevant academic sources.

Keywords used to find relevant literature in databases.

Grouping literature based on common themes or categories.

Prioritizing credible sources like peer-reviewed articles over unreliable ones.

A question that has enough existing literature and accessible data to investigate.

A research question that adds new knowledge or addresses an important problem.

Evaluating if the research question can be answered with available resources.

The assessment of whether sufficient data or literature exists for a research question.

Adjusting a research question to make it clear, concise, and researchable.

Reducing the scope of a research question to ensure it's manageable and precise.

Using findings from literature reviews to refine your research question.

A research inquiry that is expected to lead to an important finding or advancement in knowledge.

Arranging literature reviews based on how research has evolved over time.

Categorizing studies based on research methods like qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-methods.

Briefly describing the main points, methods, results, and conclusions of studies.

Identifying agreements, disagreements, and controversies within the literature.

Assessing the strengths and weaknesses of studies, including sample size and research design.

Pointing out underexplored areas in research that need further study.

Writing in a clear style that is accessible and avoids overly complex language.

Ensuring a smooth flow of ideas and clear transitions in the literature review.