Developmental Psych Revision Notes PDF
Document Details
Uploaded by FinerVector3326
Durham University
Tags
Summary
These notes provide a summary of developmental psychology concepts and their application. Various theories are discussed, including Tinbergen's levels of explanation, Tajfel's minimum group paradigm, and various theories of human mating, relationships, social interactions, aggression, and gender.
Full Transcript
Developmental psych revision notes Tinbergen’s level of explanation: Tajfel’s minimum group paradigm- studied intergroup perceptions and behaviour The matching hypothesis- people are more likely to form committed relationships with others who are equally as socially desirable Social dominance th...
Developmental psych revision notes Tinbergen’s level of explanation: Tajfel’s minimum group paradigm- studied intergroup perceptions and behaviour The matching hypothesis- people are more likely to form committed relationships with others who are equally as socially desirable Social dominance theory- societies organize themselves based on group social hierarchies Proximity effect- simple exposure to a stimulus or person increases liking WEIRD samples- western, educated, industrial, rich, democratic Humans are inherently social e.g minimal group paradigm Dunbar- living socially was a major driving force in the evolution of a human’s brain- emphasizes the importance of humans being social creatures Dunbar’s no. 150- group size vs brain size Sternberg (1986) Triarchic model of love Social exchange theory- based on the principles of rewards and costs in interactions- ST- different physical attractiveness LT- couples are equally attractive - Simple standard- is my relationship profitable? (Outcome=rewards-costs) - Comparison level- what we expect and feel we deserve from our relationships (High Cl- relationships are rewarding) - Comparison level for alternatives- what we realistically expect we could get elsewhere (includes other partners or no partner) Outcome (Profit) = Rewards - Costs Satisfaction = Outcome - CL Dependence= Outcome- CLalt Women prefer men to have an inverted V shape, especially for long term relationships Equity theory- importance of balance 1. Partners are concerned with fairness (taking both partner’s outcomes into account) 2. Inequity causes distress 3. Partner will take steps to restore equity Equality- give gift equal in value Equity- do something in proportion to the benefits received Human mating patterns: Monogamy: one male, one female Polygyny: several females, one male Polyandry: several males, one female Promiscuity: no bonded relationship Sex is not dichotomous - XO (Turner’s syndrome) - XXY (Kilnefelter’s syndrome) Cohen’s d= Male average- female average/pooled standard deviation Bem Sex Role Inventory (BSRI) Social role theory (Eagly 1987) Learning theory- gender stereotypes- learned through reward and punishment Social learning theory- emphasizes the importance of modelling Social identity theory- people's sense of self is based on their membership in social groups Gender schema theory- gender typed schema develops Inter-sexual selection: Opposite sex prefers some traits more than others, increasing the frequency of those genes in the next generation Intra-sexual competition- some traits make an individual a better competitor against members of their own sex Wood and Eagly’s biosocial model of gender- division of labor in society is shaped by the interaction of biological and social processes- cause of sex differences and beliefs Evolutionary theory- female parental investment > male PI - Greater competitiveness in men - Aversion to physical risk and low aggression in women Activation effects of testosterone- the batista boys- XY fetuses- at puberty, they all experienced a release of T Biosocial theory- canalised development- importance of the environment- David Reimer Epigenetics- combines social and biological approaches Sociocultural approaches -Developmentally focus on learning and modelling -Via parents, media and wider society (patriarchy) -Children observe and adopt gender-behavior patterns Evolutionary approaches -Focus on consequences of anisogamy for selection -Assume (some) biological causation, particularly wrt T Interactionist perspective (Felson’s symbolic interactionist approach) People create shared meanings through their interactions -T/genes influence gender identity; behavior unclear -T interacts with social factors to influence behavior Hormone effects: 1. Activational effects- transient and occur throughout life 2. Organisational effects- permanent and occur early in development 3. Priming effects- occurs when an individual’s exposure to a certain stimulus influences their response to a subsequent prompt, without realisation 4. Proximate effects- immediate or direct cause of an event Types of aggression - Direct (the aggressor is indefinable and can be counterattacked) - Indirect (aggressor remains hidden) - Instrumental- aggression to achieve a goal - Expressive- aggression as anger - Coercive- assaults, threats, humiliation - Conformist- when people conform to their in group’s aggressive behavior towards an out-group Psychoanalytic theory Id, ego and superego Aggression is the result of a weak ego Frustration aggression theory Frustration is interference with a goal response that leads to reward Cognitive Neo-Associationist Cultural effects of aggression- US South Evolutionary approaches- Cost of injury < Benefits of success= Aggression Heritability- aggression is strongly heritable (40-50%) Pluralistic ignorance- look to others to define ambiguous events Diffusion of responsibility- responsibility divisible by the number present Negative reinforcement- occurs when performing an action stops something unpleasant from happening- can result in an increase in aggression Reciprocal altruism- an individual helps another, with the expectation that the other will return the favor in the future- majority of individuals need to cooperate for the strategy to become common Naturalistic fallacy- someone believes something is morally good because its natural Hamilton’s rule- I should help you if the cost to my fitness is less than the benefit to your fitness when multiplied by our relatedness Prisonner’s dilemma: Prisoner’s dilemma