Psychodynamic Approaches: Alfred Adler PDF
Document Details
Uploaded by SimplifiedCadmium8668
Tags
Summary
This document presents a summary of psychodynamics in relation to Alfred Adler. It explores essential core concepts and theories related to Adler's work. The document outlines various aspects of human behavior and personality, influenced by different social and cultural factors.
Full Transcript
Psychodynamic Approaches: Alfred Adler MODULE 3 Contributions of Psychodynamic Theories During the early to middle 1900’s, many psychologists interested in personality were reacting to, developing and challenging Freud’s psychanalytic theory These psychodynamic theorists sometimes con...
Psychodynamic Approaches: Alfred Adler MODULE 3 Contributions of Psychodynamic Theories During the early to middle 1900’s, many psychologists interested in personality were reacting to, developing and challenging Freud’s psychanalytic theory These psychodynamic theorists sometimes continued to support many themes from Freud's work, sometimes challenged other themes and concepts and developed their own theoretical approaches that often incorporated: The role of unconscious processes, needs and motives The role of early experiences in creating enduring patterns of personality The importance of internal, mental representations and their relation to goals and strivings in life The role of emotional, affective dimensions of experience and their relation to goals, motivations and behaviours A focus on “ego” growth throughout life, and on individual agency in the construction of personality Movement towards understanding the profound role of social and cultural influences Activity: Future Identities Think for a moment and write down one vision of yourself in the future that you hope will come true. Once you are done this, list one feared future self Discussion questions: What relevance, if any, do you think these future visions of yourself have for your current personality? Are life goals and future selves related to enduring patterns of behaviour? Who was Alfred Adler? Alfred Alder was a Viennese physician He became acquainted with Freud by reading The Interpretation of Dreams After defending Freud’s theory publicly, he was asked to join the Vienna Psychoanalytic Society He reported that his childhood was miserable due to a severe rivalry with his older brother and his suffering from various illness He suffered from rickets as a child and came close to death several times He had a younger brother who died during infancy, and it has been reported that he became a physician to “conquer death.” His early memories often concerned competition with his older brother In 1910, he became president of the Vienna Psychoanalytic Society He resigned in 1911 due to disagreements with Freud After breaking with Freud, he went on the create a rival approach of psychoanalysis that he called individual psychology. Major Tenants of Alder’s Individual Psychology For Adler, people are born with weak and inferior bodies as infants, and this leads to feelings of inferiority and a feeling of dependence on other people Six major tenants of Alder’s individual psychology 1) The most important dynamic force behind people’s behaviour is the striving for success or superiority 2) People’s subjective perceptions shape their behaviour and personality 3) Personality is unified and self-consistent 4) The value of all human activity must be seen from the viewpoint of social interest 5) The self-consistent personality structure develops into a person’s style of life 6) A style of life is molded by people’s creative power Some Differences Between Adler and Freud Freud’s views: Adler’s views Motivation stems from basic People are motivated largely by social evolutionary drives related to sex and influences and by striving for aggression superiority and success People have little to no choice in People are largely responsible for who shaping their personality they are Present behaviour is caused by past Present behaviour is shaped by experiences people’s views of the future Heavy emphasis on unconscious Psychologically healthy people are components of behaviour usually aware of what they are doing and why they are doing it Striving for Success or Superiority Adler proposed that striving for success or superiority was the most important motivating force in human behaviour Based on the idea that we are all helpless and dependent on others in childhood and this activates feelings of inferiority Feelings of inferiority motivate people to strive for either superiority or success Throughout life we are driven to better ourselves to compensate for these initial feelings Psychologically healthy and unhealthy strivings: Psychologically unhealthy people strive for personal superiority Psychologically healthy people are motivated by social interest and strive for success for all of humanity Regardless of their motivation for striving, people move towards a personally constructed final goal of personal superiority or success for all humanity The final goal is a fiction created by the individual that unifies their personality, and renders behaviour comprehensible The final goal begins being set by about 4 or 5, when children have sufficiently developed their creative power If children are neglected or too pampered, goals for superiority can become largely unconscious If children experience love and security, they are likely to set conscious goals defined in terms of success and social interest In striving for a final goal, people create and pursue many preliminary goals, which fit together in a sometimes unconscious, but self-consistent, pattern Inferiority Complex: Striving for Superiority as Compensation For Adler, people strive for superiority or success as a means of compensation for their feelings of inferiority or weakness People notice this inferiority because they possess an innate tendency towards completion or wholeness Perceived inferiorities are often related to physical deficiencies, but are relevant to us as whole individuals (in our psychological and social experiences) Inferiority complex: when a person is overwhelmed by feelings of inferiority instead of being motivated toward success (social interest) by those feelings When experiencing an inferiority complex, people may overcompensate by striving for personal superiority with little or no concern for others People may also consciously or unconsciously hide their self-centeredness behind what seems like social concern A Style of Life For Adler, we overcome inferiority and strive towards a final goal by developing a style of life This expresses our unique (and freely chosen) compensations and preliminary goals, and provides a framework within which later experiences are dealt with It includes a person’s final goal, preliminary goals, self-concept, empathy, and attitude toward the world. Influenced by early experiences and mostly set by 4 or 5 years of age (though aspects can change throughout life). An individual’s style of life influences how they create meaning and construct fictional goals for the future Creative power: The self is constructed by individuals through strivings after goals In this way, individuals have the freedom to choose our own destinies Subjectivity in Adler’s Theory Alder suggested that the ways in which people strive for superiority or success are shaped by their subjective perception of reality Subjective perceptions of reality are described as fictions A fiction is a belief or expectation about the future that serves to motivate present behavior Adler felt people behaved as if their fictions were true In this way, Adler suggested that people are motivated not by what is true, but instead by their subjective perceptions of what is true In contrast to Freud’s causality (behaviour has an unconscious cause), Adler emphasized teleology (behaviour is understood in terms of its final purpose or aim) In this view, physical deficiencies and perceived inferiorities are not the causes of personality, rather they influence our motivations and strivings toward future goals that we construct Social Interest Social interest: feeling of oneness with all humanity. Origins of social interest. The potentiality for social interest is found in everyone. Originates from the mother–child relationship and is fostered by experiences in the early social environment. Importance of social interest. Adler proposed that social interest was the best measure of psychological health and maturity. He described it as “the sole criterion of human values” and the “barometer of normality.” The major factor underlying all types of maladjustments in personality is an undeveloped social interest The Role of Birth Order One enduring idea from Adler’s work is his view of the role of birth order Adler thought that birth order was an important influence on personality development as it provided different opportunities for the creation of the final goal and a style of life First born: At first they are the favored “only child,” but later they are “dethroned” and need to learn to share parental attention with siblings This leads to tendencies for independence, but also striving to regain status Second born: born into situations of rivalry and competition These can be motivating, but repeated failures can be damaging to self-esteem Last born: Usually more pampered as the “baby of the family” Can lead to high levels of ambition, but too much comparison may be overly pressuring, leading to a “lazy” response and dependency on others First Memories A common therapeutic technique used by Adler involved asking clients to describe their first memories, or early recollections For Adler, early recollections provide clues to help understand a person’s current style of life Early memories do not have a causal effect (as Freud suggested) Instead, people reconstruct the events in these memories to make them consistent with a theme or pattern running through their life In this way, early memories can help identify and illustrate conscious and unconscious strivings that are causing challenges in adjustment Evaluating Adler’s Theory How do you think Adler’s theory relates to our evaluation categories 1) How much does it generate research? 2) Is it falsifiable? 3) Does it organize a wide range of relevant data? 4) Can it provide a guide for action or intervention? 5) How internally consistent is it? 6) Is it parsimonious?