Lessons 18-19-20: Stereotyping, Prejudice, and Bias PDF
Document Details
Uploaded by AdmirableLimeTree9972
SNSPA
Tags
Related
- Educational Psychology 7e: Canadian Edition - Chapter 6 Summary PDF
- Social Psychology Midterm 2 Study Guide PDF
- CM2 - Relation Entre Groupes, Discrimination et Identité Sociale PDF
- PSY 2660 Social Psychology Study Guide for Exam 3 PDF
- Stereotypes, prejudices and discrimination - Chapter 13 PDF
- Psyc-391 Final Exam Study Guide PDF
Summary
This document covers lessons on stereotyping, prejudice, and bias, exploring concepts like social categorization, blatant and subtle bias, identity theories, and the impact on targets. It discusses the interplay of cognition and emotion, the stereotype content model, and strategies for reducing prejudice, such as contact hypothesis and empathy.
Full Transcript
**Lessons 18-19-20: Stereotyping, Prejudice, and Bias** 1. **Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination**: - **Stereotypes** are cognitive structures containing beliefs about a group. - **Prejudice** is an emotional evaluation of a group. - **Discrimination** refers to...
**Lessons 18-19-20: Stereotyping, Prejudice, and Bias** 1. **Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination**: - **Stereotypes** are cognitive structures containing beliefs about a group. - **Prejudice** is an emotional evaluation of a group. - **Discrimination** refers to behaviors driven by prejudice. 2. **Social Categorization**: - Categorization simplifies information but leads to exaggerated intergroup differences and minimized intragroup differences. - Studies like Tajfel's Minimal Group Paradigm show that mere group categorization is sufficient for bias. 3. **Blatant vs. Subtle Bias**: - **Blatant Bias** involves overt favoritism or derogation due to real or perceived conflicts. - **Subtle Bias** is more latent, automatic, and often unconscious, stemming from cognitive processes. 4. **Identity Theories**: - **Social Identity Theory** (Tajfel): Group memberships contribute to self-esteem, influencing bias. - **Self-Categorization Theory** (Turner): Identity shifts depending on social context. 5. **Stereotype Activation and Application**: - Stereotypes are not always automatically activated; their application depends on context and cognitive load. 6. **Motivated Control**: - Stereotypes can be weakened through perspective-taking, training, and intentional counterstereotypical thinking. 7. **Impact on Targets**: - **Attributional Ambiguity**: Targets of stereotypes may question whether feedback is biased. - **Stereotype Threat**: Fear of confirming stereotypes can reduce performance in relevant domains. **Lesson 21: Prejudice and Its Emotional Dimensions** 1. **Interplay of Cognition and Emotion**: - While stereotypes are cognitive, emotional prejudices (e.g., contempt, envy, pity) often drive discrimination more directly. 2. **Stereotype Content Model (SCM)**: - Groups are evaluated along dimensions of **warmth** and **competence**: - High warmth, low competence (e.g., elderly): Pity. - High warmth, high competence (e.g., allies): Admiration. - Low warmth, low competence (e.g., outgroups): Contempt. - Low warmth, high competence (e.g., rivals): Envy. 3. **Behavioral Implications (BIAS Map)**: - Warmth predicts active behaviors (helping or harming), while competence predicts passive behaviors (ignoring or undermining). 4. **Integrated Threat Theory**: - Realistic threats (e.g., resource competition) and symbolic threats (e.g., value conflicts) shape prejudice. 5. **Group-Specific Prejudices**: - Race: Rooted in social construction rather than biology. - Gender: **Ambivalent sexism** combines hostile and benevolent attitudes. - Ageism: Focused on perceptions of incompetence and resource competition. - Sexual Prejudice: Includes discrimination based on nonvisible identities, often driven by disgust. 6. **Reducing Prejudice**: - **Contact Hypothesis**: Positive intergroup contact reduces prejudice if conditions like equal status and shared goals are met. - **Empathy and Perspective-Taking**: Reduce negative stereotypes and improve intergroup relations.