17 Health PDF
Document Details
Uploaded by Deleted User
Tags
Summary
This document summarizes different aspects of personality, health, stress, and coping mechanisms. It touches on various topics like the interaction of personality with health, different coping styles, and models of personality-illness connections.
Full Transcript
17 Health Tuesday, November 19, 2024 10:05 AM HEALTH (W.H.O definition): complete state of well-being, encompassing 1. Physical well-being 2. Mental well-being 3. Social/emotional well-being Ø NOT merely the absence of DIESEASE or INFIRMITY BIG QUESTION: Ø How does personality affect (or...
17 Health Tuesday, November 19, 2024 10:05 AM HEALTH (W.H.O definition): complete state of well-being, encompassing 1. Physical well-being 2. Mental well-being 3. Social/emotional well-being Ø NOT merely the absence of DIESEASE or INFIRMITY BIG QUESTION: Ø How does personality affect (or interact) with health ? - Ex. Are some people more likely to become ill? - Ex. Are some people better equipped to tolerate stress? STRESS = subjected feeling Ø Produced by events perceived as uncontrollable + threatening Ø Feeling of being overwhelmed by events that you cannot control STRESSOR = objective phenomenon that can be MEASURED Ø Change or event in the environment - Daily hassles vs major life events IS COPING A STYLE? = behavioural response of the individual Ø Little support for "coping style" perspective Ø Coping as a DYNAMIC PROCESS Ø Interaction among: - Stressor features - Coping context/setting - Individual differences (personality) Ø Categorizing coping: - Emotion focused > stay calm - Problem focused > study plans/steps to solve a problem - Relationship focused > effort to maintain your relationship during stressful situations/listen/show empathy - Approach-avoidance > pretend the situation doesn't exist - Positive reframing > think about the situation at a different perspective ADAPTIVE vs MALADAPTIVE COPING Ø Exam is hard >> wishful thinking (maladaptive) VS >> making strategic plans/accepts it as challenge instead of avoiding it (adaptive coping) UNDERSTANDING COPING Ø Context/Situation - Contextual + situational factors influence all aspects of coping, from strategies engaged t success Ø Fit of environment to coping response predicts effectiveness EVALUATING COPING STRATEGIES BEST COPING STRATEGIES: 1. Problem solving = make a plan, do something 2. Positive Reappraisal = find the positive/silver lining 3. Support seeking = surround yourself with supportive others POOR COPING STRATEGIES 1. Denial + avoidance = better to work through stuff 2. Rumination (worrying) = dwelling can be bad sa to 3. Support seeking = surround yourself with supportive others POOR COPING STRATEGIES 1. Denial + avoidance = better to work through stuff 2. Rumination (worrying) = dwelling can be bad MODERATION = questions of "when" + "for whom" - Does X predict Y ? Ex. X = stress, Y = illness >> Neuroticism (high vs low) MEDIATION = questions of "how" + "why" Neuroticism (X) >> higher stress reactivity >> Illness (Y) MODELS OF PERSONALITY-ILLNESS CONNECTION 1. Interactional Model 2. Transactional Model 3. Health Behaviour Model EXAMPLE - INTERACTIONAL MODEL A INTERACTIONAL MODEL B SUMMARY: MODELS OF PERSONALITY-ILLNESS CONNECTION Ø Most models of personality + illness include a key variable of stress Ø Personality may or may not DIRECTLY impact STRESS-ILLNESS connection Ø Personality Influences: - Type of events that we encounter Ø Most models of personality + illness include a key variable of stress Ø Personality may or may not DIRECTLY impact STRESS-ILLNESS connection Ø Personality Influences: - Type of events that we encounter - How we perceive events - How we respond to events (COPING RESPONSES) - Health behaviors (healthy vs unhealthy habits BEHAVIOUR PATTERNS AND HEALTH TYPE A BEHAVIOR PATTERN: Ø Achievement motivation + competitiveness Ø Time urgency Ø HOSTILITY + AGRESSION HOSTILITY: The Lethal Component (high neuroticism > poor health outcomes) Ø Easily irritated by small frustrations + inconveniences Ø Type A structured interview gets at this component Ø Questionnaire measures of Hostility - STRONG PREDICTOR OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE TYPE D (DISTRESSED) PERSONALITY Ø Combination of 2 Traits: 1. NEGATIVE AFFECTIVITY = tendency to frequently experience negative emotions, across ti 2. SOCIAL INHIBITIONS = inhibit the expression of emotions, thoughts, and behaviours in so Ø Predicts poor health outcomes for CARDIAC PATIENTS (increased mortality, faster disease MECHANISMS: 1. Higher levels of cortisol (stress hormone), inflammation 2. Poor health behaviours (less time outdoors/medical checkups) 3. Lack of social support ime + situations ocial interactions e progression) MECHANISMS: 1. Higher levels of cortisol (stress hormone), inflammation 2. Poor health behaviours (less time outdoors/medical checkups) 3. Lack of social support NEGATIVITY AND HEALTH NEUROTICISIM = experience negative affects; anxiety, depression, hostility, self-consciousness Ø Stressful events >> more threatening + demanding Ø MALADAPTIVE COPING STRATEGIES that involve hostility, passiveness, and RUMINATION Ø Interpersonal withdrawl BENEFITS OF POSITIVE EMOTIONS Positive emotions may: Ø Sustain coping efforts Ø Provide a break from stress Ø Give people time + opportunity to restore depleted resources >> restoration of social rela Ø Fredrickson's "BROADEN + BUILD MODEL" of positive emotions OPTIMISM - PESSIMIST = make stable, GLOBAL, and internal explanations for bad events - OPTIMISTS = make unstable, specific, external explanations for bad events Ø DISPOSITIONAL OPTIMISM = expectation that good events will be plentiful + bad events Ø Optimism predicts good health + health-promoting behaviours HARDINESS (strength + courage) Ø HARDY PERSONALITY = existential courage + motivation to cope effectively w/ stressful ci - Better able to "resist" the negative effects of stress + cope more effectively over time - Biological - Negative relationship > HIGH HARDINESS = lower depression + fatigue THREE 3'S OF HARDINESS 1. Control = Feeling in control of your life 2. Commitment = tend to set goals/higher purpose 3. Challenge N ationships s are rare in future ircumstances