BEHL 2005/2019 (UO) Introductory Research Methods PDF
Document Details
Uploaded by LuckiestForethought
BEHL
Hannah Keage
Tags
Summary
This document provides an introduction to ANOVA, analyzing differences in means among more than two groups. It covers one-way ANOVAs, effect sizes, post-hoc tests, and issues with multiple comparisons in research.
Full Transcript
BEHL 2005 / BEHL 2019 (UO) Introductory Research Methods COMPARING MORE THAN TWO GROUPS: ANOVA Professor Hannah Keage What are we going to cover? One-way ANOVA Content from this lecture references: ANOVA • ANOVA = analysis of variance. • Investigates differences in means. • In this course, we...
BEHL 2005 / BEHL 2019 (UO) Introductory Research Methods COMPARING MORE THAN TWO GROUPS: ANOVA Professor Hannah Keage What are we going to cover? One-way ANOVA Content from this lecture references: ANOVA • ANOVA = analysis of variance. • Investigates differences in means. • In this course, we will look at oneway between group ANOVAs. • Each participant in a different group. • >2 groups (if 2 groups, use a t-test). • One-way refers to having one IV/factor. Each IV/factor will have >2 levels. ANOVA • The key ANOVA estimate is the F. • F = (model variance) / (error variance). • The model variance and error variance terms are calculated through “sums of squares”; we won’t go into these calculations, but don’t be surprised to see these terms in your jamovi output. • Remember, error variance often referred to as residuals. • The larger the F, the more variance you are explaining in your DV by your IV, as compared to error (although, F is not a direct measure of effect size). • The larger the value of F the more evidence we have against the null hypothesis. Effect sizes for ANOVA • F is not an effect size measure. • Partial eta2 or η2. • η2 = 0.01 indicates a small effect • η2 = 0.06 indicates a medium effect • η2 = 0.14 indicates a large effect My F is statistically significant! • This relates to a main effect of an IV/factor with >2 levels (as you progress in psychology, you’ll also assess interaction factors). • This only means that there is at least 1 statistically significant difference between your groups. • It does not tell you WHERE that significant difference(s) is(are). Post-hoc tests • Tell you where the significant group difference(s) is(are). • You can only run post-doc tests if you F is statically significant (p<.05 if you have a standard alpha of 0.05). 6 comparisons Group 1 v Group 2 Group 1 v Group 3 Group 1 v Group 4 Group 2 v Group 3 Group 2 v Group 4 Group 3 v Group 4 Why don’t I just run lots of t-tests? • Essentially you could achieve a similar outcome by skipping over the ANOVA and running six t-tests. But if you did this, you’d run into issues around multiple comparisons related to Type I error rate. • Remember, if alpha = 0.05, then the Type I error rate = 5%. • Remember, Type I error rate is the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis given its true; false positive. • Central principle behind null hypothesis testing is that we control our Type I error rate. • When we consider families of tests, e.g. the six tests required to test differences between our four groups (e.g. 6*0.05=0.30), then the Type I error rate inflates. Correction for multiple comparisons • Adjusting the alpha to ensure you don’t inflate your Type I error rate. • Bonferroni method, alpha/number of tests you’ll run. • E.g. 0.05/6 = 0.008. Therefore alpha now 0.008 and you’ll only judge statistical significance (p value) when <.008. • There are other methods for methods. 6 comparisons Group 1 v Group 2 Group 1 v Group 3 Group 1 v Group 4 Group 2 v Group 3 Group 2 v Group 4 Group 3 v Group 4 p=.007 p=.046 p=.009 p=.027 p=.128 p=.369 ANOVA Reporting example: F(3,36) = 2.31, p=.002, η2 =.008 There was a statistically significant main effect of TV watching on fatigue, with a medium effect. Post-hoc tests revealed that this effect was driven by those who watched more than 6 hours per day having significantly higher fatigue levels than those who watched less than 1 hour per day (large effect; p=.007). All other post-hoc tests were not statistically significant (p≥.008) and had negligible to weak effects. F(degrees of freedom group, participants) = esimate, p=x, η2 =x BEHL 2005 / BEHL 2019 (UO) Introductory Research Methods COMPARING MORE THAN TWO GROUPS: ANOVA Professor Hannah Keage