What is a common focus of disagreement among different schools of thought regarding Second Language Acquisition?
Understand the Problem
The question is asking about the common areas of disagreement among various theories or approaches in Second Language Acquisition. It provides multiple choices which can lead to a clearer understanding of what specific aspect is frequently contested by these different schools of thought.
Answer
The Critical Period Hypothesis is a common focus of disagreement in Second Language Acquisition.
A common focus of disagreement among different schools of thought regarding Second Language Acquisition (SLA) is the role and impact of the Critical Period Hypothesis, which suggests there is an optimal time window for acquiring a second language effectively.
Answer for screen readers
A common focus of disagreement among different schools of thought regarding Second Language Acquisition (SLA) is the role and impact of the Critical Period Hypothesis, which suggests there is an optimal time window for acquiring a second language effectively.
More Information
The Critical Period Hypothesis proposes that there is a specific timeframe during which language acquisition occurs more naturally and efficiently, typically during childhood. However, researchers debate its applicability to learning a second language compared to a first language.
Tips
A common mistake is assuming that theories universally accept the critical period as the primary factor for success in language learning. Always consider alternative theories that also emphasize motivation, exposure, and interaction.
Sources
- CRITICAL PERIOD CONTROVERSIES FOR SECOND LANGUAGE - scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu
- Theories of second-language acquisition - Wikipedia - en.wikipedia.org
AI-generated content may contain errors. Please verify critical information
