What can be determined from an experimental study that cannot be determined from a correlational study?
Understand the Problem
The question is asking for a distinction between the conclusions that can be drawn from experimental studies versus correlational studies. It specifically focuses on identifying aspects like causation and effects that are unique to experimental research.
Answer
Causal relationships can be determined from experimental studies.
Controlled experiments can determine causality, unlike correlational studies which show only variable associations.
Answer for screen readers
Controlled experiments can determine causality, unlike correlational studies which show only variable associations.
More Information
In an experimental study, researchers manipulate an independent variable and control other variables to see its effect on a dependent variable. This setup allows experiments to establish whether a change in one variable causes a change in another, beyond mere association.
Tips
A common mistake is assuming correlation implies causation; correlational studies can show that variables are related but cannot determine which variable causes changes in another.
Sources
- Correlational vs Experimental Research - scribbr.com
AI-generated content may contain errors. Please verify critical information
