The author of Passage 2 would most likely respond to the fourth sentence of Passage 1 ('Clearly . . . highways') by
Understand the Problem
The question is asking how the author of Passage 2 would react to a statement made in Passage 1 regarding the dangers of reckless driving in Montana. It requires understanding the context and implications of both passages to form a reasonable response or argument.
Answer
Pointing to evidence that accidents dropped without speed limits.
The author of Passage 2 would most likely respond to the fourth sentence of Passage 1 ('Clearly . . . highways') by pointing to evidence that contradicts the danger described, showing that accident rates actually dropped and drivers became more courteous without speed limits.
Answer for screen readers
The author of Passage 2 would most likely respond to the fourth sentence of Passage 1 ('Clearly . . . highways') by pointing to evidence that contradicts the danger described, showing that accident rates actually dropped and drivers became more courteous without speed limits.
More Information
Passage 2 highlights an unexpected outcome—improved driving behavior and reduced accidents—contrary to fears about not having speed limits.
Tips
A common mistake is assuming that removal of speed limits universally leads to reckless driving; however, Passage 2 demonstrates opposing evidence.
Sources
AI-generated content may contain errors. Please verify critical information
