Is our belief that there are two and only two categories of people (male and female) a biological reality or a social construction? What is Kessler's view?
Understand the Problem
The question is addressing beliefs surrounding gender categorization, specifically whether the categories of male and female are biologically based or socially constructed. It also asks for Kessler's view on this issue.
Answer
Kessler views gender categories as social constructs, not strict biological realities.
Kessler argues that categorizing people strictly as male or female is more of a social construction than a biological reality. He suggests that what society considers 'normal' male or female bodies are often medically constructed, emphasizing the ambiguity of natural bodies.
Answer for screen readers
Kessler argues that categorizing people strictly as male or female is more of a social construction than a biological reality. He suggests that what society considers 'normal' male or female bodies are often medically constructed, emphasizing the ambiguity of natural bodies.
More Information
Kessler's view challenges the traditional binary understanding of gender by highlighting the role of social and medical interventions in defining male and female categories.
Tips
A common mistake is considering gender as strictly biological, ignoring the significant social influences.
Sources
- Believing is Seeing: Biology as Ideology - jstor - jstor.org
- Jeffner Allen - jstor - jstor.org
AI-generated content may contain errors. Please verify critical information
