Increasingly, there are reasonable grounds for the 'out of Africa' hypothesis that stipulates that Anatomically Modern Humans (AHM) evolved in Africa and migrated and replaced arch... Increasingly, there are reasonable grounds for the 'out of Africa' hypothesis that stipulates that Anatomically Modern Humans (AHM) evolved in Africa and migrated and replaced archaic humans in Europe and Australasia. This is because __.
Understand the Problem
The question is asking about the reasons that support the 'out of Africa' hypothesis regarding the evolution and migration of Anatomically Modern Humans. It presents multiple-choice options that suggest reasons for this hypothesis.
Answer
C: Gradual transition from MSA to LSA in Africa.
The correct answer is C: in East and Southern Africa, we see a gradual transition from MSA to the LSA, which is a far cry from the abrupt appearance of the Upper Palaeolithic high culture.
Answer for screen readers
The correct answer is C: in East and Southern Africa, we see a gradual transition from MSA to the LSA, which is a far cry from the abrupt appearance of the Upper Palaeolithic high culture.
More Information
The gradual transition indicates a continuity in cultural and technological development in Africa, supporting the hypothesis of a single origin and migration out of Africa.
Tips
A common mistake is overlooking the significance of continuous archaeological evidence in supporting migration theories.
Sources
- Out of Africa? | American Scientist - americanscientist.org
- New Research Confirms 'Out Of Africa' Theory Of Human Evolution - sciencedaily.com
AI-generated content may contain errors. Please verify critical information
