Do you agree with New London's reasoning about being 'too bright'? Do you agree with the judge's decision that it was not discriminatory to not hire people who are highly intellige... Do you agree with New London's reasoning about being 'too bright'? Do you agree with the judge's decision that it was not discriminatory to not hire people who are highly intelligent? How would you have determined the cognitive ability requirements for this job?
Understand the Problem
The question is asking for opinions on the reasoning and decisions made by the New London Police Department regarding their hiring practices and the use of cognitive testing. It seeks to explore the implications of their criteria for selecting police officers based on cognitive ability and intelligence.
Answer
Opinions vary on the reasoning and decision; cognitive requirements should align with job needs.
The final answer is subjective and involves personal opinion regarding New London's reasoning and the judge's decision. For cognitive ability requirements, a balanced approach that considers necessary job skills without unnecessary exclusion is advisable.
Answer for screen readers
The final answer is subjective and involves personal opinion regarding New London's reasoning and the judge's decision. For cognitive ability requirements, a balanced approach that considers necessary job skills without unnecessary exclusion is advisable.
More Information
The New London case highlights concerns about overqualification and retention in job hiring. Some argue that overly intelligent candidates may become bored quickly, leading to high turnover, while others believe excluding them is unfair. Cognitive ability requirements should match actual job demands to avoid unnecessary exclusion.
Tips
A common mistake is not considering both sides of the discrimination argument: retention and job satisfaction versus fairness and equal opportunity.
Sources
AI-generated content may contain errors. Please verify critical information
