A subsidiary hazard label is not required on a package containing a Class 8 (corrosive) material, which has a subsidiary hazard of Division 6.1 (poison) if the toxicity of the mate... A subsidiary hazard label is not required on a package containing a Class 8 (corrosive) material, which has a subsidiary hazard of Division 6.1 (poison) if the toxicity of the material is based solely on the corrosive destruction of tissue rather than systemic poisoning. True or False?
Understand the Problem
The question is asking whether a subsidiary hazard label is necessary for a package containing a Class 8 corrosive material that is only toxic due to its corrosiveness, rather than systemic poisoning. This requires knowledge of hazardous materials labeling regulations.
Answer
True
The final answer is True.
Answer for screen readers
The final answer is True.
More Information
According to 49 CFR, a Division 6.1 subsidiary hazard label is not required if the toxicity is based on corrosive destruction rather than systemic poisoning.
Tips
Ensure the basis of toxicity is clear as it determines labeling requirements.
Sources
- 49 CFR Part 172 Subpart E -- Labeling - eCFR - ecfr.gov
AI-generated content may contain errors. Please verify critical information
Thank you for voting!
