Untitled Quiz
21 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What is the significance of having specific laws rather than vague laws?

  • They ensure that arbitrary results are minimized. (correct)
  • They allow for broader interpretation by individuals.
  • They encourage individual discretion in law enforcement.
  • They provide flexibility in legal proceedings.
  • Which principle requires that the reason for overriding the Charter must be rational and unbiased?

  • Balance
  • Proportionality
  • Minimal Impairment
  • Rational Connection (correct)
  • What must be considered for the principle of proportionality to be satisfied?

  • The interests of the claimant must always prevail.
  • The legal system can impose any limitation on rights.
  • The benefits of the limitation must outweigh its burdens. (correct)
  • Public opinion must influence the legislative aim.
  • In the case of Ford v Quebec, what was deemed necessary to limit the use of English signs?

    <p>Preservation of the French language</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does the principle of Minimal Impairment require in legal measures?

    <p>Legal measures must be the least intrusive.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does Section 33 of the Charter allow a government to do?

    <p>Pass laws that operate notwithstanding certain charter provisions.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which type of rights is subject to legislative override under Section 33?

    <p>Fundamental Freedoms and Legal Rights</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following is NOT listed as a fundamental freedom under Section 2?

    <p>Freedom of trade and commerce</p> Signup and view all the answers

    How often is the legislative override invoked according to the information provided?

    <p>Rarely used</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What do Sections 7 to 14 of the Charter primarily deal with?

    <p>Legal Rights</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which group is explicitly mentioned as a protected class under Section 15's equality rights?

    <p>Individuals based on age</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the primary effect of a law declared under Section 33?

    <p>It remains effective despite charter violations.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following is a limitation on the legislative override mentioned in the content?

    <p>It cannot apply to the fundamental structure of the Charter.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following rights is not subject to legislative override?

    <p>None of the above</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the maximum duration that a legislative override can remain in effect?

    <p>5 years</p> Signup and view all the answers

    How many times has the legislative override been used to date?

    <p>15 times</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which province used the legislative override in 2000 to prevent gay marriage?

    <p>Alberta</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is one argument against the legislative override?

    <p>It infringes on fundamental rights.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does Section 1 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms establish about rights?

    <p>Rights are subject to reasonable limits.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    One interpretation of the legislative override is that it serves as a safety valve. What does this imply?

    <p>It prevents excessive judicial power.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Why is it considered a criticism that fundamental rights yield to a majoritarian decision?

    <p>It could undermine individual freedoms.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    Section 33: Legislative Override

    • Parliament or a provincial legislature can declare an Act operates notwithstanding Charter sections 2 (Fundamental Freedoms) or 7-15 (Legal Rights and Equality Rights).
    • This allows a law to remain in effect even if it violates a Charter right or freedom listed in these sections.
    • The override can be in effect for a maximum of five years and is tied to the life of Parliament.
    • It can be invoked multiple times.
    • It has been used 15 times, mostly in Quebec. Examples include Alberta's ban on gay marriage (2000), Quebec's override of minority language rights (1988), and Saskatchewan's Catholic school funding policies. Ontario's Premier Ford threatened to use it regarding Toronto City Council cuts.
    • Democratic rights, mobility rights, Indigenous rights, and language rights are not subject to legislative override.

    Criticisms and Support for Legislative Override

    • Criticisms: A significant constitutional defect; fundamental rights shouldn't be overridden by majority decisions; courts should have the final say.
    • Support: A useful "safety valve" to respond to Supreme Court decisions or preempt Charter challenges; acknowledges that courts aren't perfect; rooted in Canadian political tradition; prevents courts from having unlimited power.

    Section 1: Reasonable Limits

    • The Charter guarantees rights and freedoms subject to "reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society."
    • Rights and freedoms are not absolute.
    • Laws must not be vague or open-ended to be upheld by courts; they must avoid arbitrary results. Examples citing the Little Sisters Book Store case.

    Proportionality Test (Oakes Test)

    • A balance between the means to achieve an objective and the burden on the claimant is required.

    • The objective must be sufficiently important to justify overriding the Charter.

    • A rational connection between the override and the legislative aim must exist.

    • The override must minimally impair the Charter right.

    • A balance must exist between the benefits of the limit and its effects.

    • Rational Connection: The reason for the override must be rational and unbiased. The Oakes case is cited as an example.

    • Minimal Impairment: The least intrusive means must be used; Ford v. Quebec (English signs) is mentioned as an example.

    • Balance: The effects must be proportional to the objective; the Oakes test is cited.

    Fundamental Freedoms (Section 2)

    • Freedom of conscience and religion.
    • Freedom of thought, belief, opinion, and expression (including press and media freedoms).
    • Freedom of peaceful assembly.
    • Freedom of association.
    • The text mentions these as including rights relating to arrest and detention, search and seizure, criminal proceedings, and punishment, but doesn't detail specifics.

    Equality Rights (Section 15)

    • Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to equal protection and benefit of the law without discrimination (based on race, national or ethnic origin, color, religion, sex, age, or mental or physical disability).

    Determining Which Rights Are More Important

    • The text raises questions about prioritizing conflicting rights, such as freedom of religion vs. freedom of speech, freedom of religion vs. gender equality, privacy vs. freedom of the press, and individual rights vs. communal rights; but provides no answers.

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    More Like This

    Untitled Quiz
    6 questions

    Untitled Quiz

    AdoredHealing avatar
    AdoredHealing
    Untitled Quiz
    37 questions

    Untitled Quiz

    WellReceivedSquirrel7948 avatar
    WellReceivedSquirrel7948
    Untitled Quiz
    55 questions

    Untitled Quiz

    StatuesquePrimrose avatar
    StatuesquePrimrose
    Untitled Quiz
    18 questions

    Untitled Quiz

    RighteousIguana avatar
    RighteousIguana
    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser