Weetabix Limited v Manji Food Industries Legal Case Quiz
12 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to Lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What specific action is the Plaintiff/Applicant requesting with regards to infringing 'MULTIBIX' whole grain cereal biscuits?

  • Destruction on oath (correct)
  • Financial compensation
  • Public apology
  • Change of product name

What information is the Plaintiff/Applicant seeking regarding supplied goods that fall under the injunction orders?

  • Details of employees involved
  • Personal phone numbers
  • Bank account details
  • Sales and quantities supplied (correct)

Based on the text, what is the main reason for the Plaintiff's application supported by Richard Martin's affidavit?

  • To stop the Defendant from selling infringing products (correct)
  • To increase market share
  • To create a partnership with the Defendant
  • To seek financial compensation

What is NOT mentioned as part of the relief sought by the Plaintiff/Applicant in prayer 5?

<p>Request for public apology (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What action does the Plaintiff/Applicant want the Defendant/Respondent to take regarding cereal products with 'BIX' in the trademark?

<p>Avoid selling similar products (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In addition to damages or account of profits, what other order can the Court make according to the Plaintiff's application?

<p>Any just and fit order in the interest of justice (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What specific orders did the application seek to secure in the case?

<p>Issuance of a temporary injunction against the Defendant from selling 'MULTIBIX' products. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which provisions of the law were cited in the application before the court?

<p>Sections 1A, 1B, 3A and 63 (e) of the Civil Procedure Act. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Why did the Plaintiff request a temporary injunction against the Defendant?

<p>To prevent the Defendant from importing, selling, or packaging products similar to theirs. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which suffix was mentioned as a concern in the application regarding product names?

<p>'BIX' (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What action did the Plaintiff want the court to take regarding products resembling 'WEETABIX'?

<p>Restraining the Defendant from selling such products pending court decision. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which body besides the Defendant was included in the list of entities to be restrained by the injunction?

<p>'licensees' (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

More Like This

Legal Case Citation Format Quiz
5 questions
Legal Case: Hurtado v. California
8 questions
Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser