Podcast
Questions and Answers
Which of the following best describes the purpose of compensatory damages in tort law?
Which of the following best describes the purpose of compensatory damages in tort law?
- To cover the legal fees incurred by the plaintiff during the lawsuit.
- To provide a symbolic payment to the plaintiff as a sign of regret from the defendant.
- To compensate the plaintiff for actual losses, aiming to restore them to the position they were in before the tort occurred. (correct)
- To punish the defendant for their wrongful actions and deter future misconduct.
In tort law, 'intent' always requires demonstrating that the tortfeasor desired the specific harmful outcome of their actions.
In tort law, 'intent' always requires demonstrating that the tortfeasor desired the specific harmful outcome of their actions.
False (B)
Stella overhears a private conversation and posts it on Facebook. Which type of invasion of privacy is this MOST likely to be considered?
Stella overhears a private conversation and posts it on Facebook. Which type of invasion of privacy is this MOST likely to be considered?
- Public Disclosure of Private Facts (correct)
- Intrusion into Another's Private Affairs
- Appropriation of Another's Identity
- False Light
Distinguish between 'special damages' and 'general damages' in the context of compensatory damages.
Distinguish between 'special damages' and 'general damages' in the context of compensatory damages.
In a fraudulent misrepresentation claim, the plaintiff's reliance on the misstatement does not need to be justifiable for the claim to be valid.
In a fraudulent misrepresentation claim, the plaintiff's reliance on the misstatement does not need to be justifiable for the claim to be valid.
The intentional confinement or restraint of another person's activities without justification is known as _________.
The intentional confinement or restraint of another person's activities without justification is known as _________.
Which of the following scenarios constitutes assault?
Which of the following scenarios constitutes assault?
What is the key difference between 'Wrongful Interference with a Contract' and 'Wrongful Interference with a Developing Economic Relationship'?
What is the key difference between 'Wrongful Interference with a Contract' and 'Wrongful Interference with a Developing Economic Relationship'?
Using a person's image without their permission for commercial gain is known as Appropriation of Another's Identity, Name, Image, or ______.
Using a person's image without their permission for commercial gain is known as Appropriation of Another's Identity, Name, Image, or ______.
Comparative negligence is a defense that completely absolves the defendant of liability, regardless of their degree of fault.
Comparative negligence is a defense that completely absolves the defendant of liability, regardless of their degree of fault.
Jax persuades Eliyah to breach his contract with his current auditor. What element is LEAST necessary to establish Wrongful Interference with a Contract?
Jax persuades Eliyah to breach his contract with his current auditor. What element is LEAST necessary to establish Wrongful Interference with a Contract?
Match the following terms with their corresponding descriptions:
Match the following terms with their corresponding descriptions:
Which of the following is an example of an intentional tort?
Which of the following is an example of an intentional tort?
If Bob spreads false rumors about Harold, his competitor, leading contractors to choose Bob's services, Harold can sue Bob, even if Harold doesn't definitively prove financial damages.
If Bob spreads false rumors about Harold, his competitor, leading contractors to choose Bob's services, Harold can sue Bob, even if Harold doesn't definitively prove financial damages.
Match the following torts with their corresponding descriptions:
Match the following torts with their corresponding descriptions:
Which element is NOT required to prove fraudulent misrepresentation?
Which element is NOT required to prove fraudulent misrepresentation?
Which of the following scenarios best illustrates the tort of conversion?
Which of the following scenarios best illustrates the tort of conversion?
In North Carolina, a landowner has the same duty of care to both lawful visitors and trespassers on their property.
In North Carolina, a landowner has the same duty of care to both lawful visitors and trespassers on their property.
A store owner is aware of a leaky roof that causes water to drip onto the floor creating a slipping hazard. What duty does the store owner have to their customers, and what actions should they take to avoid a negligence claim?
A store owner is aware of a leaky roof that causes water to drip onto the floor creating a slipping hazard. What duty does the store owner have to their customers, and what actions should they take to avoid a negligence claim?
The standard used to determine if a duty of care was breached is called the __________ __________ __________ standard.
The standard used to determine if a duty of care was breached is called the __________ __________ __________ standard.
Match each element of negligence with its correct description:
Match each element of negligence with its correct description:
Which of the following is the most accurate definition of 'proximate causation' in a negligence case?
Which of the following is the most accurate definition of 'proximate causation' in a negligence case?
If a person suffers emotional harm due to another's negligence, they can always successfully sue for damages.
If a person suffers emotional harm due to another's negligence, they can always successfully sue for damages.
Explain the difference between intentional torts and negligence, focusing on the element of intent.
Explain the difference between intentional torts and negligence, focusing on the element of intent.
A professional failing to meet the standard minimum level of special knowledge and ability may be sued for what?
A professional failing to meet the standard minimum level of special knowledge and ability may be sued for what?
Dram shop acts hold a bar owner liable for injuries caused by intoxicated patrons, but only if the patron was already visibly intoxicated when served.
Dram shop acts hold a bar owner liable for injuries caused by intoxicated patrons, but only if the patron was already visibly intoxicated when served.
What is the legal principle that prevents a plaintiff from recovering damages if they voluntarily entered a risky situation, knowing the risk involved?
What is the legal principle that prevents a plaintiff from recovering damages if they voluntarily entered a risky situation, knowing the risk involved?
An unforeseeable intervening event that breaks the connection between a wrongful act and an injury is known as a ______ cause.
An unforeseeable intervening event that breaks the connection between a wrongful act and an injury is known as a ______ cause.
Match the following legal concepts with their descriptions:
Match the following legal concepts with their descriptions:
In negligence cases, which of the following defenses asserts that the plaintiff has not sufficiently proven all necessary elements of the negligence claim?
In negligence cases, which of the following defenses asserts that the plaintiff has not sufficiently proven all necessary elements of the negligence claim?
Consider a scenario where a social host serves alcohol to a guest who then causes an accident while driving home. Under what legal principle might the social host be held liable in some states?
Consider a scenario where a social host serves alcohol to a guest who then causes an accident while driving home. Under what legal principle might the social host be held liable in some states?
In a scenario where a pedestrian is injured in an accident caused by a driver's negligence, and then further injured by falling debris from a nearby explosion while awaiting medical assistance, the explosion would always be considered a superseding cause, relieving the driver of all liability for the burn injuries.
In a scenario where a pedestrian is injured in an accident caused by a driver's negligence, and then further injured by falling debris from a nearby explosion while awaiting medical assistance, the explosion would always be considered a superseding cause, relieving the driver of all liability for the burn injuries.
Which of the following is NOT a requirement for establishing strict product liability?
Which of the following is NOT a requirement for establishing strict product liability?
A product can be deemed 'unreasonably dangerous' if a safer, economically feasible alternative design existed but was not adopted by the manufacturer.
A product can be deemed 'unreasonably dangerous' if a safer, economically feasible alternative design existed but was not adopted by the manufacturer.
What is the key distinction between a manufacturing defect and a design defect?
What is the key distinction between a manufacturing defect and a design defect?
A product is considered defective due to ______________ if the foreseeable risks of harm could have been reduced or avoided by providing reasonable instructions or warnings, and the omission of such instructions renders the product not reasonably safe.
A product is considered defective due to ______________ if the foreseeable risks of harm could have been reduced or avoided by providing reasonable instructions or warnings, and the omission of such instructions renders the product not reasonably safe.
What is the significance of 'material fact' in the context of misrepresentation?
What is the significance of 'material fact' in the context of misrepresentation?
Under strict product liability, a retailer can be held liable for a defective product even if they were not negligent in handling or inspecting the product.
Under strict product liability, a retailer can be held liable for a defective product even if they were not negligent in handling or inspecting the product.
Which of the following scenarios best illustrates a design defect?
Which of the following scenarios best illustrates a design defect?
Match the type of defect with its description:
Match the type of defect with its description:
Which of the following actions constitutes confinement in the context of false imprisonment?
Which of the following actions constitutes confinement in the context of false imprisonment?
In every state, merchants have unlimited privilege to detain a person suspected of shoplifting for any duration without any repercussions.
In every state, merchants have unlimited privilege to detain a person suspected of shoplifting for any duration without any repercussions.
What is the key element that elevates conduct to 'intentional infliction of emotional distress' beyond just causing emotional upset?
What is the key element that elevates conduct to 'intentional infliction of emotional distress' beyond just causing emotional upset?
In North Carolina, a defendant can be sued for ruining a marriage under the tort of alienation of _________.
In North Carolina, a defendant can be sued for ruining a marriage under the tort of alienation of _________.
Which of these elements is NOT required to prove defamation?
Which of these elements is NOT required to prove defamation?
A statement of opinion, even if harmful to someone's reputation, can be classified as defamation.
A statement of opinion, even if harmful to someone's reputation, can be classified as defamation.
Match the type of defamation with its form:
Match the type of defamation with its form:
In the context of defamation, what additional element must be proven if the victim is a public figure?
In the context of defamation, what additional element must be proven if the victim is a public figure?
Flashcards
What is a Tort?
What is a Tort?
A wrongful act causing harm or injury, leading to civil liability.
Compensatory Damages
Compensatory Damages
Compensate plaintiffs for actual losses, restoring them to their original position before the tort.
Special Damages
Special Damages
Cover quantifiable monetary losses like medical bills and lost wages.
General Damages
General Damages
Signup and view all the flashcards
Intentional Torts
Intentional Torts
Signup and view all the flashcards
Unintentional Torts
Unintentional Torts
Signup and view all the flashcards
Tort Defense
Tort Defense
Signup and view all the flashcards
What is Assault?
What is Assault?
Signup and view all the flashcards
False Imprisonment
False Imprisonment
Signup and view all the flashcards
Privilege to Detain
Privilege to Detain
Signup and view all the flashcards
Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
Signup and view all the flashcards
Alienation of Affection
Alienation of Affection
Signup and view all the flashcards
Defamation
Defamation
Signup and view all the flashcards
Libel
Libel
Signup and view all the flashcards
Slander
Slander
Signup and view all the flashcards
Defamation & Public Figures
Defamation & Public Figures
Signup and view all the flashcards
Trespass to Land
Trespass to Land
Signup and view all the flashcards
Conversion (Tort)
Conversion (Tort)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Negligence (Tort)
Negligence (Tort)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Negligence: Duty
Negligence: Duty
Signup and view all the flashcards
Negligence: Breach
Negligence: Breach
Signup and view all the flashcards
Negligence: Causation in Fact
Negligence: Causation in Fact
Signup and view all the flashcards
Negligence: Proximate Cause
Negligence: Proximate Cause
Signup and view all the flashcards
Reasonable Person Standard
Reasonable Person Standard
Signup and view all the flashcards
Intrusion into Private Affairs
Intrusion into Private Affairs
Signup and view all the flashcards
False Light
False Light
Signup and view all the flashcards
Public Disclosure of Private Facts
Public Disclosure of Private Facts
Signup and view all the flashcards
Appropriation of Identity
Appropriation of Identity
Signup and view all the flashcards
Fraudulent Misrepresentation
Fraudulent Misrepresentation
Signup and view all the flashcards
Misstatement of Material Fact
Misstatement of Material Fact
Signup and view all the flashcards
Wrongful Interference with a Contract
Wrongful Interference with a Contract
Signup and view all the flashcards
Wrongful Interference with a Developing Economic Relationship
Wrongful Interference with a Developing Economic Relationship
Signup and view all the flashcards
Malpractice
Malpractice
Signup and view all the flashcards
Good Samaritan Statutes
Good Samaritan Statutes
Signup and view all the flashcards
Dram Shop Acts
Dram Shop Acts
Signup and view all the flashcards
Assumption of Risk
Assumption of Risk
Signup and view all the flashcards
Superseding Cause
Superseding Cause
Signup and view all the flashcards
Duty of Care
Duty of Care
Signup and view all the flashcards
Elements not proven
Elements not proven
Signup and view all the flashcards
Social Host Liability
Social Host Liability
Signup and view all the flashcards
Misrepresentation
Misrepresentation
Signup and view all the flashcards
Strict Product Liability
Strict Product Liability
Signup and view all the flashcards
Sellers Under Strict Liability
Sellers Under Strict Liability
Signup and view all the flashcards
Proving Strict Liability
Proving Strict Liability
Signup and view all the flashcards
Unreasonably Dangerous
Unreasonably Dangerous
Signup and view all the flashcards
Manufacturing Defect
Manufacturing Defect
Signup and view all the flashcards
Design Defect
Design Defect
Signup and view all the flashcards
Inadequate Warnings
Inadequate Warnings
Signup and view all the flashcards
Study Notes
- A tort is a wrongful act causing harm or injury that leads to civil liability
Damages in Tort Actions
- Compensatory damages are awarded to plaintiffs to cover actual losses, aiming to restore them to their pre-tort position
- Special damages cover quantifiable monetary losses like medical expenses and lost wages
- General damages compensate for nonmonetary aspects like pain and suffering
- Punitive damages are awarded to punish wrongdoers and deter similar actions, appropriate only for egregious or reprehensible conduct
Classifications of Torts
- Intentional torts stem from intentional violations of persons or property
- Unintentional torts involve negligence
Defenses
- A defendant can raise a legally recognized defense even if the plaintiff proves all elements of a tort
- Available defenses depend on the specific tort
- Successful defenses can result in partial or full release from liability
- Common defenses include consent and comparative negligence
Intentional Torts Against Persons
- An intentional tort needs intent, meaning the tortfeasor intended to commit an act interfering with personal or business interests in an unlawful way
- In tort law, "intent" means the person intended the consequences of the act or knew certain consequences were likely
- Intent can be transferred if a defendant intends to harm one person but unintentionally harms another
- The statute of limitations sets a time limit for filing a lawsuit
Assault and Battery
- Assault is any intentional and unexcused threat of immediate harmful or offensive contact creating reasonable fear
- Battery is an unexcused and harmful or offensive physical contact intentionally performed
- Contact can be harmful, offensive, or unwelcome, with no physical injury needing to occur
- Contact can be made directly or through a force set in motion by the defendant
- Whether contact is offensive is determined by a reasonableness standard
- Pointing a gun is assault; firing it and hitting someone is battery
False Imprisonment
- False imprisonment is the intentional confinement or restraint of another's activities without justification
- Confinement can be through physical barriers, restraint, or threats of force
- Businesses may face false imprisonment suits for detaining suspected shoplifters
- Merchants in most states have the privilege to detain a person suspected of shoplifting
- Detention must be reasonable in manner and length of time, but specifics vary by state
Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
- This tort is defined as extreme and outrageous conduct causing severe emotional distress
- Actionable conduct must be so extreme it exceeds societal decency bounds
- North Carolina recognizes alienation of affections tort, allowing lawsuits for ruining a marriage
Defamation
- Defamation requires a false, factual statement (not opinion) communicated to at least one person, causing injury or harm
- Public figures must also show the defendant acted with malice
- Libel is defamation in writing or permanent form, with special and general damages
- Slander is spoken defamation, with special damages
Invasion of Privacy
- Encompasses intrusion into private affairs like searching property or eavesdropping
- It also involves portraying someone negatively through false light
- Public disclosure of private facts and using someone's identity without permission for commercial gain are also included
Fraudulent Misrepresentation
- This occurs when someone uses intentional deceit for personal gain
- It involves misstating a material fact, knowing it's false, to persuade another party to rely on it, resulting in damages
Business Torts
- Wrongful interference with a contract requires a valid contract, the defendant knowing of it, intentionally persuading a third party to breach it, and the plaintiff experiencing damages
Wrongful Interference with a Developing Economic Relationship
- Includes spreading false rumors to drive business away from a competitor
Intentional Torts Against Property
- Trespass to land involves intentionally entering another's land or remaining after being asked to leave
Conversion
- Conversion is the wrongful taking or using of another's personal property
Negligence
- Negligence occurs when someone suffers injury due to another's failure to fulfill a duty of care
- The tortfeasor doesn't intend the consequences but creates a risk
- Intentional torts can be considered negligence if intent is unproven
Elements of Negligence
- Duty: The defendant owed a duty of care to the plaintiff
- Breach: The defendant breached that duty
- Causation in Fact: The injury wouldn't have occurred without the breach
- Proximate Causation: The connection between breach and injury is foreseeable
- Damages: The plaintiff suffered a legally recognizable injury
- Emotional harm alone is insufficient
Determining Breach of Duty
- The reasonable person standard: courts assess how a reasonable person would have acted in similar circumstances
- The reasonable person standard is objective
Duty of Landowners in North Carolina
- Landowners must not unnecessarily expose lawful visitors to dangerous situations and must warn of hidden dangers if they know of them or should have known
- No duty to warn if the condition is obvious
- The duty owed to trespassers in NC is to refrain from willfully harming them
Duty of Professionals
- Professionals are held to a higher standard of care due to their superior knowledge, skill, or training
- If a professional violates their duty of care, they may be sued for malpractice
Good Samaritan Statutes
- These protect those who voluntarily aid others from being sued for negligence
Dram Shop Acts
- These hold bar owners or bartenders liable for injuries caused by intoxicated patrons
Defenses to Negligence
- Defendants often claim the required elements of negligence weren't met
- Assumption of risk: A plaintiff knowingly entering a risky situation cannot recover
- Superseding cause: An unforeseeable event breaks the connection between the wrongful act and injury
Contributory vs Comparative Negligence
- Contributory negligence: A plaintiff who was also negligent could not recover anything from the defendant (followed in NC)
- Comparative negligence: Plaintiff and defendant negligence are computed, and damages are distributed accordingly
Strict Liability
- Strict liability applies to abnormally dangerous activities, regardless of fault
Product Liability
- Those who make, sell, or lease goods can be held liable for harm caused by those goods
Product Liability Claims
- Based on negligence: manufacturers must exercise due care in all production areas
- Privity of contract isn't required to sue
- Fraudulent misrepresentation: requires knowingly false misrepresentation and intent to induce reliance
- Strict product liability: applies to sellers of goods if the product was defective and unreasonably dangerous when it left the seller
Unreasonably Dangerous Products
- Products are dangerous beyond an ordinary consumer's expectation
- A less dangerous alternative was feasible but not produced
Manufacturing Defects
- Occurs when a product departs from its intended design, even with due care
Design Defects
- Exist when a product's design is flawed
- Proving requires showing a reasonable alternative design existed and the failure to adopt it made the product unsafe
Inadequate Warnings
- Products can be defective due to inadequate warnings or instructions
- Sellers must warn of harm from foreseeable misuse
- No duty to warn of obvious risks
Strict Liability Application
- Applied to manufacturers and sellers to injured bystanders
- Also applies to suppliers of component parts
Defenses to Product Liability
- Include statute of limitations, preemption, assumption of risk, product misuse, comparative negligence, and commonly known dangers
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.