Podcast
Questions and Answers
What legislation did US Term Limits Inc pass in many states?
What legislation did US Term Limits Inc pass in many states?
Who argued against the term limits law?
Who argued against the term limits law?
Representative Ray Thornton
The Arkansas Supreme Court declared the term limits law constitutional.
The Arkansas Supreme Court declared the term limits law constitutional.
False
Who delivered the opinion of the Court?
Who delivered the opinion of the Court?
Signup and view all the answers
What was a key argument in favor of the Amendment?
What was a key argument in favor of the Amendment?
Signup and view all the answers
Who delivered the dissenting opinion?
Who delivered the dissenting opinion?
Signup and view all the answers
The Court upheld the decision based on the _____ Clause.
The Court upheld the decision based on the _____ Clause.
Signup and view all the answers
What did the Amendment establish about federal office qualifications?
What did the Amendment establish about federal office qualifications?
Signup and view all the answers
Study Notes
Background
- US Term Limits, Inc. sought to limit congressional terms through state legislation.
- Arkansas enacted Amendment 73, preventing individuals with 2 Senate terms or 3 House terms from appearing on the ballot.
Thornton Argument
- Representative Ray Thornton argued Amendment 73 violated the US Constitution.
- The Arkansas Supreme Court ruled the amendment unconstitutional, citing Powell v McCormack, which established federal office qualifications outlined in the Constitution.
US Term Limits Argument
- Proponents claimed the Amendment did not bar anyone from office but limited ballot access, allowing write-in votes.
- The argument included states' rights to regulate electoral procedures under the Constitution.
Opinion of the Court Delivered By
- Justice Stevens authored the Court's opinion.
Opinion of the Court
- The Court upheld the Arkansas Supreme Court decision, referencing Powell v McCormack and the Supremacy Clause.
- The Tenth Amendment was deemed inapplicable, asserting states cannot reserve rights not originally held.
- The ruling declared the Amendment unconstitutional for its intent to circumvent the Constitution's mandate.
Dissenting Opinion Delivered By
- Justice Thomas presented the dissenting opinion.
Dissenting Opinion
- The dissent argued that Article I of the Constitution sets only minimum qualifications, allowing states to impose additional qualifications based on the Reservation Clause.
- Asserted that a power does not need prior existence to be reserved by the states.
Significance
- The ruling reinforced the Supremacy Clause, clarifying that states cannot modify federal qualifications for office as enumerated in the Constitution.
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.
Description
Test your knowledge on the US Term Limits, Inc v Thornton case with these flashcards. This quiz covers key concepts such as the background of the case and the arguments presented by Representative Ray Thornton. Perfect for law students and those interested in political science.
